Customer Reviews


63 Reviews
5 star:
 (33)
4 star:
 (10)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (16)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


45 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Subversively funny
I made the mistake of reading this book out on my deck, and I laughed out loud so often that the neighbors probably thought I finally lost it.

As with the best humor, the book is done with an absolutely straight face (well, except for the goofy portraits of the "artists" which beign each chapter). So straight, in fact, that I've seen at least two columnists...

Published on September 6, 2002 by P. ODonnell

versus
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars deadpan humor, Photoshop-style
I got this book for Christmas 2002. I'm an art student, so I appreciated the spot-on parodies of art criticism. However, I can also easily tell that these cats were "painted" in Photoshop or a similar image-manipulation program, using filters and processes that give a furry texture to painted areas. There is one photo I'm not certain about (a white cat with blue...
Published on December 26, 2002 by verbminx


‹ Previous | 1 27| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

45 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Subversively funny, September 6, 2002
By 
P. ODonnell (Conshohocken, PA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics (Paperback)
I made the mistake of reading this book out on my deck, and I laughed out loud so often that the neighbors probably thought I finally lost it.

As with the best humor, the book is done with an absolutely straight face (well, except for the goofy portraits of the "artists" which beign each chapter). So straight, in fact, that I've seen at least two columnists who were taken in by it and reviewed it as a serious work.

The level of detail is amazing: not just in the cat photos (which are wonderful) but in footnotes ("Stace, P. Feline Kinetic Design as Installation ARt, 1999-2001 Journal of Applied Animal Aesthetics, Vol. VII, 2001), captions (a Santa-painted cat: "...she makes us painfully aware of the continuing unhealthy santaization of winter solstice symbolism with its stupefying illusion of male as dominant gift giver").

"Why Paint Cats" works on a lot of levels - as a skewering of art criticism, a gentle poke at cat lovers and Animal Rights activists, and best of all, as good, silly fun.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Lovely Book!, October 9, 2002
By A Customer
I really enjoyed Why Paint Cats- the photography and visual presentation is amazing. All the cats look beautiful! I have bought it for several friends and it really does make a wonderful gift- the perfect coffee table book!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


24 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Very funny book, May 30, 2003
This is one of the most entertaining art books I've seen. The text is well-written enough to fool most people, and the only way I knew it was a spoof was I've read my share of art criticism and art history, even though I'm a biologist by training, and I think I can detect when someone is making fun of the whole business.

Having figured out the text was a joke, it was only a hop, skip, and a jump to figuring out the cat paintings were probably fake and probably done on a computer. I'm not positive about this, since they look so realistic, but it seems likely. Also, it seems unlikely that any cat would sit still long enough to have such elaborate paintings done.

Furthermore, if that wasn't enough, the author states that some of the paintings were by well-known artists that cost as much as $7000 each--not very likely. (Also I've never heard of any of these artists).

Whether they're real or fake, the cat paintings are truly spectacular and are entertaining just by themselves. I note that a veterinarian in a previous review of this book said he saw his first "painted cat" recently, and he said that the cat had tried to lick off the paint and had ulcers on its tongue. This could be a jest also, but I suppose someone could have been taken in by the book too and actually tried to do one.

Well, I hope most people realize the whole book is very likely an elaborate joke and don't try to paint anymore cats if it can be harmful to them, but the book as just a book of remarkable cat "paintings" is quite entertaining.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars deadpan humor, Photoshop-style, December 26, 2002
By 
verbminx (Columbus, OH United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics (Paperback)
I got this book for Christmas 2002. I'm an art student, so I appreciated the spot-on parodies of art criticism. However, I can also easily tell that these cats were "painted" in Photoshop or a similar image-manipulation program, using filters and processes that give a furry texture to painted areas. There is one photo I'm not certain about (a white cat with blue hearts), but in almost any other photo in the book, the digital processing is pretty obvious. The cats aren't physically painted... it's their photos that have been decorated, not their bodies.

I'm really alarmed by the concept that people aren't looking closely enough at the pictures to tell that they're normal cat photos that have been manipulated to look "painted." Some of them are really clever and enjoyable; I like the cat who has been given a curly moustache, the cat painted to look like an orange and blue carp, and the cat who has tribal "tattoos". Since this book does not, however, have a big sign on the front that says "THIS IS A PARODY" - and it should - please don't buy yourself a copy if you don't get the joke, and please don't buy it for anyone else who you think might take it seriously and try to paint their cat. It may sound like a cute idea, but you could really hurt your beloved pet... and who would want to do that?

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars I don't think the CATS have been painted, December 27, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics (Paperback)
I think the PICTURES of the cats have been painted (or whatever word you want to use for it.) Why I think so - first of all, this is obviously a spoof, like the authors' other books. Secondly, I don't think cats would willingly submit to such elaborate art jobs - my cats wouldn't, I'm sure.

I gave a copy of this for Christmas to my sister-in-law's mother, and she liked it very much.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Irresistably funny and very clever, October 3, 2002
By 
John Petherick (Agoura Hills Los Angeles) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics (Paperback)
.
This book is remarkable for the variety of reactions it elicits from people. I took it into the office last week and found that while some people couldn't stop laughing (as I did), others read it slowly, almost reverentially. A few even got mad that folks would paint their feline companions.
I think there's a big surprise factor in seeing the cats we're so familiar with suddenly transformed into something quite unexpected -- some are not even like cats any more, and it makes people react quite strongly.
Well worth a look, and a great read too. One of the funniest books I've read in while.

J Petherick CA

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars I am vindicated!, December 29, 2002
By 
A. White "adynomoose" (New Orleans, La United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
As a person who has been painting her cats for years, I was delighted to see that this is widely accepted and practiced! My only complaint is the lack of information on safe dyes and paints for this use. I fear that some people might use toxic paints and dyes on their animals.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


25 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars PLEASE DON'T PAINT YOUR CAT, December 12, 2002
By 
Christine M. Fletcher (Portland, OR United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I thought Silver's previous book, Why Cats Paint, was hilarious. This book I thought was funny, too - until I saw my first painted cat today. It never occurred to me that people might actually take this stuff seriously and try to imitate it. PEOPLE - IT'S A SPOOF. The cat I saw had paint all over the inside of his mouth and a badly ulcerated tongue. We couldn't get the paint off his coat by any means other than clipping the fur.

Enjoy the book. BUT PLEASE - DO NOT PAINT YOUR CAT!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


19 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Was disapointed, January 9, 2007
By 
Lynda Lankford (Bakersfield, California) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I ordered three copies for Christmas gifts and when I got them they were hard back pocket size editions..I was very disapointed and did not give them out!
So when you order certain books, make sure they're not miniatures!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Funny and Edgy, September 6, 2003
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics (Paperback)
Warning: This book is not for people who take themselves (or anything else) too seriously.

I love "Why Paint Cats." The photography and concepts are incredibly well executed and clever. The commentary and 'interviews' are the best part of the work, poking fun at everyone involved, especially art critics (fortunately). The authors have the stuffy self-importance of the critical world down perfectly, right down to the 'references', for example: "The artist's depiction of a green-eyed purple cat as a metaphor for monster...draws a clear parallel between the socially noxious effects of television and the environmentally destructive consequences of feline-avian conflict in the urban context," - D. Koplos, The Green-Eyed One-Tailed Spying Purple Parrot Eater. L.A. Art Times, 2001.

The work is startlingly original and can be read on several levels. I heartily recommend it in every way.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 27| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics
Why Paint Cats: The Ethics of Feline Aesthetics by Burton Silver (Paperback - August 8, 2002)
$18.99 $14.38
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist