Customer Reviews


10 Reviews
5 star:
 (5)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars "People win wars"
THE BATTLE OF RUSSIA is the fifth entry in Frank Capra's `Why We Fight' series. Originally presented to audiences in two parts for its first run in 1943 it covers the years 1941-'42, and, as the title suggests, devotes most of its attention to the harsh fighting on the Eastern Front following Germany's massive attack against Russia. As always, the intent was to explain...
Published on July 23, 2005 by Steven Hellerstedt

versus
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Battle of Russia. 1943 documentary film.
The Battle of Russia is a documentary film covering the Soviet war with Germany from 1941 to early 1943. It was produced during the world war two, hence the cut off date at 1943. Having been made with the taxpayer dollar it is now in the public domain, and many companies are reproducing it and selling in VHS and DVD form. My review will look first at this particular...
Published on November 13, 2004 by David Goldovt-Ryzhenkov


Most Helpful First | Newest First

13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Battle of Russia. 1943 documentary film., November 13, 2004
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
The Battle of Russia is a documentary film covering the Soviet war with Germany from 1941 to early 1943. It was produced during the world war two, hence the cut off date at 1943. Having been made with the taxpayer dollar it is now in the public domain, and many companies are reproducing it and selling in VHS and DVD form. My review will look first at this particular version of the movie with its physical reproduction of the film, later at the film's contents.

I will start with the packaging. The box front has photos of a US soldier with frost on his face, US troops marching, and another American soldier having a chow. On the back - a British AA gun being manned by British soldiers. That is right - all photos that are not consistent with the contents of the movie - Soviet German war. This foreshadowed the effort put in by "Goodtimes" into its product.
Special Features: none. Scene index is present, however.
Reproduction quality: At the beginning of the film there is a note by "Goodtimes" about how they carefully restored the original. Unfortunately, this ended up being an ironic statement. Frames are darker. This is an issue as in a number of places the details are deteriorated because of this. The sides and the bottom of the movie are truncated. It was noticeable as I played my VHS simultaneously with the DVD to compare the two. This was a disappointment, as I wanted to upgrade my VHS copy of this film. Overall, the VHS version, recorded in EP mode, outstripped this DVD in quality. I will be looking for another DVD version of this film.

Movie's contents: The film covers battles of the Eastern Front in chronological order, incorporating into the script social and political topics. A little observation I made through the years is that documentary movies during the cold war relied heavily on this film's footage along with the German newsreels when covering the Eastern Front. Peter Batty's "German Invasion of the Soviet Union" went as far as taking the animated maps from this movie wholesale.
The footage used in Battle for Russia is not raw, but rather tape cut into segments most of which are less than five seconds. This is an unfortunate, yet common practice in documentary films. The documentary has scenes of prewar Soviet films, namely Ivan Grozny, Aleksandr Nevsky, Man with a Movie Camera (documentary), and the parade and maneuvers footage (documentary). Wartime footage presented in the film is good. It can be complemented, with some overlapping, by "Soviet Secret Archives: The Russian Front"(3 parts), Russia: "Blood Upon the Snow", or "War of the Century: When Hitler Fought Stalin" film series.
Some reviewers referred to this film as outdated; with a notion that now, we know the truth. I respectfully disagree with this. We still have a lot of appeasement in World War II history. There seems to be a lot of material out on the Soviet German Front, but if we filter for primary sources such as diaries, journals, and wartime operative documents, not that much is left. I find that facts happen at lower level, and pompous numbers and "facts" mean nothing we do not know (or care) how they were compiled/where they are coming from. This movie is the pro-Allies American view circa world war two. I keep this film on my bookshelf and enjoy the footage analysis it presents.

Four stars for the movie contents.
One star for this version of the DVD.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars "People win wars", July 23, 2005
THE BATTLE OF RUSSIA is the fifth entry in Frank Capra's `Why We Fight' series. Originally presented to audiences in two parts for its first run in 1943 it covers the years 1941-'42, and, as the title suggests, devotes most of its attention to the harsh fighting on the Eastern Front following Germany's massive attack against Russia. As always, the intent was to explain the question posed by the series' title, and not present an unbiased documentation of events.

Drawing on old movies - for instance, a number of scenes from Sergei Eisenstein's `Alexander Nevsky' are inserted - THE BATTLE OF RUSSIA begins with a historical survey of repeated invasions and repulsions, almost all invaders breaking on the gate of Moscow, defeated either by Russia's immense size or its brutal winters. The film quickly returns to the modern day and shows Germany's speedy conquest of the Balkans, including Hungary, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Greece. These are simply preparatory steps to extend the Russian front, though. Germany launches its attack on June 22, 1941 as the first part ends. The second part examines the failure of Germany's blitzkrieg style of warfare when confronted with Russia's defense-in-depth strategy. The failed sieges of Leningrad and Stalingrad are show in detail. For the first time in the series the German prove not to be invincible.

In many ways THE BATTLE OF RUSSIA is the most interesting movie in the series. There was a short summer of good feelings between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted roughly from 1942 to 1947, and both nations muted their criticism of the other. This movie conveniently fails to mention the German-Russian Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, a treaty that major Allied participants in the war like Winston Churchill could never forget and never mention without revealing their lingering bitterness. For the first and one of the few times Hollywood lauds praise on the heroic people of the Soviet Union. Perhaps it's unfair to hold up the message of this movie with the later rhetoric of the cold war, but it is a little startling to hear a government sponsored movie announce that `no invincible armies (can stand) against the determined will of a free and united people' and realize the free and united they're talking about are Soviet citizens. As usual, the transfer print manages to look good most of the time, although some of the images are terribly blurry and look over exposed. It's a discount dvd, so, as always, that's more an observation than it's a deal breaking complaint.



Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


15 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Propaganda? Yes. But also something else., August 19, 2002
By A Customer
Yes, this is propaganda. But this is also a rare film. You will see a million WWII movies that gloss over the russian side of the story. They fought bravely with their backs against the wall and prevailed against some serious odds. The director had to work with the russian propaganda footage, and so it is a glimpse into their world at the time. It is a rare film because it does not brand the whole nation "evil". And, actually, it gives you a piece of history you don't know.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Still one of the Best World War II movies, May 11, 2011
Of course the movie is propaganda and it idealizes Soviet Union. On the other hand it's a rare case when Americans show real magnitude of Soviet Union contribution in the fight against Nazi Germany.

There was so much anti Soviet propaganda and history distortions after the war, that the movie would be very good counter balance in that sense.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Interesting insight into How the war was won, April 18, 2011
By 
Magic Lemur (Somewhere in Madagascar) - See all my reviews
One of the sad things about the Cold War is how much it has inflated the role of the West in beating Nazi Germany while ignoring the truth. As a consequence of this distortion, most people now think that America alone won the war against Germany and that D-Day was a decisive blow to Nazi Germany when, really, the hardest blows had already fallen in the East.

Now that's established, it is easier to see what makes this documentary so special. Filmed by director Frank Capra (who also did It's a Wonderful Life), this is a propaganda movie with a twist. Unlike so many 1950's 'Red Menace' US propaganda films, this film is a homage to the indomitable spirit of Russia and heaps lavish praise on Russia's war efforts. Without a hint of irony or reticence, the film salutes Russia and its people while speaking fondly of its size (three times that of the USA), its resources and its efforts in the war (e.g. quote from the film's start "The scale and grandeur of the Russian effort mark it as the greatest military achievement in all history" - General Douglas MacArthur).

Of course, there are few mentions of Stalin and even fewer about communism. Like all good propaganda films, it stretches the truth to the downright ludicrous, such as talking about Russians being "a free and united people" and "men of God praying for victory" (forgetting that Stalin's Russia was just as bad as Hitler's Germany). There are also moments of silliness, such as a triumphalist cavalry charge to ward off the mechanized Wehrmacht and obviously fake Soviet propaganda reels of what happened in various battles.

However, generally the film stays within the bounds of truth, with an interesting back-story about other invasions of Russia and an overview of all the different peoples of the USSR.

The film explores the battle in Russia in two parts - one leading up to the Battle of Moscow, and the second part leading to the Battle of Stalingrad. Curiously the film was shot in 1943, just before the decisive battle of Kursk, which saw the German's finally sent into head-long retreat. As a result, it displays the Russian spirit at its toughest and most enduring before it became almost a straight-forward march to Berlin.

So, if you're after a film which tells you the truth about the battle with Nazi Germany then this is one of the best candidates (though it is quite ironic to find truth in a propaganda film). If this doesn't suit though, then the only other place I can suggest is the excellent series The World at War, which correctly puts Russia centre-stage as the place where the Nazis were humbled.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The Battle of russia, February 13, 2008
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This is one of Frank Capra's better propaganda documentaries, part of the Why We Fight Series. This documentary was put together by Capra's team from films mostly made by Soviet cameramen who did a great job. Even Stalin approved of this documentary and sent Capra a foreword he specially recorded for the occasion which pleased FDR who was trying to get him to be more accommodating about Soviet plans for after the war.
Walter Huston narrates at a less frantic pace than in other films in this series. There is some fascinating footage of tribesmen who lived in the spacious reaches of the Soviet Union, such as the Cossacks, the Mongols, Tartars, Uzbeks etc who lived far away from the conflict.
There are some very moving episodes - the return of very young girls in the countryside who had been used by the Nazi troops and who were returned, although wounded and severely traumatized, to their families once the Nazi troops were defeated. There are some harrowing & grotesque shots of frozen dead on both sides and of the mourners. Also some official propaganda lines but on the whole I find this documentary so far the best of the series.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


18 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Viewing to be taken into historical context, January 16, 2001
By 
Harold Baird (Ashburn, Virginia USA) - See all my reviews
Before viewing this film one should be historically aware of the circumstnces surrounding the reasons for its production. It is part of the "Why we fight" series that was shown to new recruits that were about to become part of this tremendous worldwide conflict. This is truly a propaganda film that was intended to show our "allies", the communist Russians, in a favorable light. The intent was to instill a purpose into these recruits that we were fighting an evil force, the Nazi Germans, together with the Russians. Anybody who is historically educated in this time period realizes that the United States government no doubt realized the horrors that Joseph Stalin himself was capable of. But to attempt to rally the recruits by villianizing our allies would not serve well, therefore kind portrayal of the communists was essential. Although the awful behavior of the German invaders is documented here, there is no mention of the atrocities committed by the Russians on their German captives. I think anybody interested in history as well as nostalgia will enjoy this film when realizing the historical context in which it was produced.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Russia stops Germany cold, August 7, 2000
This video in the why we fight series shows how Germany tried to conquer Russia, but failed. The video will show that Germany did conquer some of Russia but failed in the rest. Some of the facts maybe wrong since this was filmed in the 1940's, but still is a good buy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars WW2 propaganda, October 4, 2000
By 
"ferrovipathes" (Montreal, Canada) - See all my reviews
This documentary was made before the end of WW2 and it shows. It seems made to convinced the audience that their allies of the time (USSR and China) are good, free countries and Nazi Germany is the devil incarnate. For exemple, they go into great details explaining that the USSR is a great democracy and the Stalin is a good ruler. Interesting for seing how can our 'good' western countries can ally itself with an horrible dictator such as Stalin and try to convince its people he's not so bad after all. But that's about it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Dreadfully Bad, October 29, 2002
Ok, the topic is great... the Soviet repulsion of the Nazi military might. But the war-time propaganda, the lack of depth of the "documentary", the missing facts, and the poor quality of the film make this a horrific failure when one considers the title.

I don't care if this is a known propaganda film used for recruiting in the United States during WWII... it simply has no social context sixty years later. Shouldn't we be concerned with the facts of the Nazi siege and the Soviet repulsion as they relate to a deeper understanding about the two nations of the 20th century that produced the worst dictators (Hitler and Stalin)?

Consider the following facts:

1) There was a major event in the 20th century, commonly referred to as "World War II", when most of the nations of the world were at war.

2) During that event Nazi Germany terrorized all of Europe (and especially the Soviet Union), through their military might and demonic plans (the Holocaust).

3) The Nazi's invaded the Soviet Union in 1941.

4) The Soviet Union repulsed the Nazi invasion.

I would guess that the mentally ill and the recently born make up the vast majority of the population that isn't aware of the above-mentioned facts. This movie is for them.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Why We Fight - The Battle of Russia: The Nazi March Frozen [VHS]
$9.99
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist