|
32 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A quick and able response to the WT, February 21, 2000
Robert Bowman has presented us with a book that deals with the main issue that separates the WT from fundamental Christianity--the Trinity. No time was wasted in offering this rebuttal to the WT booklet, "Should You Believe in the Trinity?", since it was also published in 1989. The book has 10 chapters: 1). Understanding the Trinity 2). The Bible and the Trinity 3). The Church and the Trinty 4). Will the Real Polytheists Please Stand Up? 5). Is Jesus a Creature? 6). Does the Bible Deny That Jesus Is God? 7). Jesus Christ Is God 8). Is the Holy Spirit a Force? 9). Trinitarianism in the New Testament 10). Worship God as He has Revealed Himself Bowman demonstrates how the WT has dishonestly handled scholarly sources and misrepresented the early church fathers and their view of Christ. He also addresses the Watchtower's misunderstanding of this doctrine, which results in their typical "straw man" argumentation. The book is not a difficult read, and it deals with many of the objections JWs have and offers answers for them. There is a scripture index for easy reference and a recommended reading section for those interested in doing more research on the Trinity. Unfortunately, most JWs will not take the time to do their own research in an attempt to understand all this doctrine really entails. They remain content to accept the "straw man" version set up by their organization. Consider the following quotes from Bowman' book: "As we shall see, nearly all of the arguments brought against the Trinity by JWs depend to some extent on misunderstanding the Trinity."(p.15) "To say that the Trinity cannot be understood likewise is imprecise, or at least open to misinterpretation. Trinitarian theologians do not mean to imply that the Trinity is unintelligible nonsense. Rather, the point they are making is that the Trinity cannot be fully fathomed, or comprehended, by the finite mind of man. There is a difference between gaining a basically correct understanding of something and having a complete, comprehensive, all-embracing, perfect understanding of it. The way many other theologians would express this difference is to say that the Trinity can be understood, or 'apprehended,' but not 'comprehended.' Some of the scholarly sources quoted in the JW booklet makes this very point. For example, the Encyclopedia Americana, which the booklet quotes as saying that the Trinity is 'beyond the grasp of human reason,' does make that statement, but in this context: It is held[by trinitarians] that although the doctrine is beyond the grasp of human reason, it is, like many of the formulations of physical science, not contrary to reason, and may be apprehended(though it may not be comprehended) by the human mind." (pp.16,17)
|