1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Challenging, but fun, August 23, 2010
This review is from: Will Shortz Presents Treacherous Sudoku: Harder Puzzles (Paperback)
These puzzles are hard enough to be challenging, but they are solveable, so fulfulling fun.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Techniques needed to solve these puzzles:, June 5, 2010
This review is from: Will Shortz Presents Treacherous Sudoku: Harder Puzzles (Paperback)
From 1 to 10, the puzzles in this book rate a 6 in difficulty.
Except for the last puzzle, I did not resort to X-wing. And there probably was another way to solve it without X-wing given that none of the other puzzles needed it.
The hardest technique I used was hidden triples, and only a few puzzles needed that. It takes me forever to find hidden triples. It is not a hard technique, but for me it is time consuming.
Most puzzles used a combination of straightforward things like naked pairs, naked triples, pointing pairs, and/or box-line reduction. You probably already use these techniques, but perhaps call them something else or don't have a name for them.
Really advanced techniques such as XY-chains, Swordfishes, or Jellyfishes were not needed. And I did not have to get out my colored markers even once. Which makes this book ideal for taking with me to places where I am likely to wait. I hate carrying around a handful of colored markers! :)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Treacherous Sudoku by Will Stortz, February 25, 2011
This review is from: Will Shortz Presents Treacherous Sudoku: Harder Puzzles (Paperback)
This is a relaxing but challenging mind expanding experience. The puzzles are solvable without guess work but certainly require some thought. It will definitely keep you sharp.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No