Customer Reviews

William Golding's Lord of the Flies (Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations)

5 star:		(8)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(5)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

This is one of my favorite books. At the beginning, we are told little of the world war that has led to the evacuation of these English schoolboys and the subsequent crash of their airplane on a remote tropical island, where they are left to fend for themselves, all adults having been killed.

12-year old Ralph is the first to emerge from the jungle undergrowth. Then, Piggy joins him. When they find a conch shell on the shore, Ralph blows it, which brings the other boys, including the choir, led by Jack. At first, the boys attempt to set up a democratic society. Ralph is elected "chief," and the conch shell is used to call assembly when decisions are required. Piggy's spectacles are used to raise a fire for rescue and roasting the wild pigs that are found in abundance on the island. Other than their isolation from the world, their greatest worry is the rumor of a beast on the island. However, as days go by, the island paradise crumbles as Jack challenges Ralph's leadership. By the end of the book, the island is in flames, two boys have been murdered, and Ralph is running for his life.

Although the boys range in ages 6 to 12, this is not a children's book. Indeed, the portrayal of their island society, degenerating from order to chaos and destruction, is so brutal that I'd probably not consider it for readers under 10. And yet, its theme of human nature and its predilection for violence and savagery is too important to overlook. This book should be required reading in every high school and college, because the characters are too well known to us, too much a part of our history and experience.

It would also be a mistake to think that the book implies that children are savages more brutal than their adult counterparts. Golding wrote this book at a time (the early 1950's) when it was fashionable for art to portray youth as an age of innocence in contrast to the corruption of adulthood (as exemplified in "The Catcher in the Rye"). Not so, Golding writes. This corruption is part of us, an innate part of Mankind itself, not something that comes with the experience of adulthood. We mustn't forget that this book is set at a time of world war.

The book is allegorical. Standing in opposition are the natural leaders, Ralph and Jack. Ralph represents good government, order, justice, restraint, responsibility, and common sense. His authority is represented by the conch, a symbol of stability, democracy, and civilization. Jack represents despotism, injustice, irresponsibility, lust for power, and oppression of the weak by the strong. His authority is the spear, which invokes fear and violence.

Piggy and Roger are respectively the henchmen of Ralph and Jack. Piggy is an overweight, asthmatic boy whose intellect and rationality make him a valuable advisor to Ralph and the object of loathing to Jack. His greatest contribution to the survival of the island civilization is his spectacles, which are used to make the fire. This is an apt symbol, since fire was ancient Man's first tool, separating him from the beasts and giving him the means to develop other technologies. Roger is a natural-born sadist who bullies the younger boys even before the decline of their civilization. An analysis on lordoftheflies.org calls him a force of primal evil. It is he whom Jack uses to maintain his control over the other boys of his "tribe" and it is he who kills Piggy on Castle Rock.

If Roger is the primal evil, Simon is the primal good. Simon is the most complicated character in Golding's novel. Although he sides with Ralph in his power struggle with Jack ("Go on being chief"), he remains an outsider to both groups. When Ralph's and Jack's groups splinter off, Piggy's prestige within Ralph's group rises, whereas Simon's falls. Piggy's dismissal of him as "batty" reveals the tension between Piggy's realism and Simon's spiritualism. Simon, however, sees what Piggy doesn't see. From the beginning, Simon believes that the feared beast is human ("Maybe it's us..."), to which Piggy contemptuously explodes, "Nuts!" Later, when the others have fled in fear from the beast on the mountaintop, only Simon is courageous enough to climb alone to the top to discover the truth, quietly trumping the bravado of Ralph and Jack. When Simon finds out that the beast is really a dead parachutist from the war-torn outside world, still strapped to his billowing parachute, he frees the corpse and returns to the others to share the truth before being ceremoniously and hysterically killed by them, thus fulfilling his role as Christ figure. Before his discovery, he stumbles upon the impaled head of a pig, presented to the beast as a gift by Jack and his superstitious savages. The scene that follows is a surreal conversation between the Head and Simon. Attended by a swarm of flies, the Head becomes a demonic apparition, confirming Simon's belief and threatening him with destruction at the hands of the others. But Simon must deliver the truth to the boys. Christ-like, he accepts the consequences ("What else is there to do?"). His message, however, is lost in the confusion of the wild tribal dance of the others on the beach in the darkness. They beat him to death and leave him in the sand, where his body is carried out to sea.

Ralph and Piggy remain the only forces against Jack's despotism and Roger's sadism. It is inevitable that they meet Simon's fate. When Jack's savages take Piggy's spectacles, he and Ralph can do nothing but confront them. Roger knocks Piggy off Castle Rock and his body is dashed to death. Ralph is left alone to escape the flames as the savages set fire to the island to force him out of hiding. Soon, Ralph is left without refuge and staggers out on the beach, where he is stopped by the appearance of a British naval officer and his crew. Rescue has come just in time. In the comfort of the adults, Ralph is the first to mourn the loss of innocence. Soon, all the savages join him in tears, becoming schoolboys again, mindful of their fall from grace. The adults have rescued them, but who will rescue the adults from the world that they have created?

Great, classic dystopia read. I'm not one to get all into the symbolism of books and behind the time period and such. I just enjoy stories for what they are. The copy that I read was a 50th anniversary edition that had some additional comments at the end about the symbolism and whatnot. They were interesting, but just that.

I won't give a synopsis of the book because I'm sure lots of people have done that before me. I think the story was well done and fairly easy to follow. Some of the dialogue was confusing at times between multiple characters, but easily figured out. This book can easily be read without knowing the background of the time period it was written in, and without understanding the symbolism woven throughout the pages.

Great story.

Lord of the Flies is one of the many examples of an inside look at the darkest corner of the human labyrinth. Other examples of individuals who had actually experienced the darkness of human warfare, such as Kurt Vonnegut or Ernest Hemmingway, thankfully walked away with the good soul and talent to document parts of history and of the human psyche that must be learned from if we as a society are to ever cease repeating these deadly mistakes.

In a way, Golding's novel takes us backwards in time, in that it places the entire cast in the Stone Age. Literally the year is much more recent, but the lack of technology, agriculture, `civilization,' and so forth create a setting that is prehistoric. This serves very well to the author's many allegorical points about the inherent, ancient depravities of mankind. Things may look different now than they did 1000 years ago, but as The Lord of the Flies would testify, they only look different. Men have not adapted themselves to be harmonious with their environment or their fellow beings; out of some animal malfunction they continue attempting to adapt their environment and their fellow man to their own selfish needs. The result is the same as it was in the Stone Age, it's the same as it is in The Lord of the Flies and it's the same as it always will be.
The most important way in which the author illustrates his theme is in the casting of casting of small children to portray the barbaric genetic predisposition we are exposed to from birth. This is another way in which Golding takes us `back in time' so to speak, and again we see that things haven't changed that much.

It isn't difficult to say if the novel accurately portrays how children of such an age would survive stranded on an island (because in actuality, they most probably wouldn't.) However, latent with symbolism and very valid observations, the `outlandish' nature of the story serves only to further drive home the point. Art generally uses exaggeration to draw attention to the things that are too under exaggerated in real life to normally pay mind to.

An important thing to note would be the growth of the children throughout the novel. Even within a relatively short amount of time, the amount of mental growth the characters go through is believable considering the circumstances. The children themselves being an allegory (much like almost everything in the novel) the differences that come about as they `age' are also metaphorical. It is metaphorical of how society has grown into bigger ambitions but remained stuck in the naiveté of early childhood. The point is driven home best at the very end of the novel in which the children, who have just actively been parts to murder and guerilla warfare begin sobbing. The mask of superiority we've given to ourselves over the course of our lives and the span of all history begins to wash off from the pure realization of the inherent tragedy of it all.

The Lord of the Flies, a book that William Golding had written in response to a book that had come out during the 1950's that was about a group of young boys who had become stranded on an island and lived happily till someone came and rescued them. Golding firmly believed that this scenario of joy would never occur in real life if a group of boys had become stranded on an island and his Lord of the Flies tells the story of such a tale.
The book starts off with a group of young British school boys. They realize that they are stranded on an island with no elders and at first life is as good as it will get but after a while barbarianism sets in and a tale of murder, warfare, and cruelty is opened up.
The book personally did not pull me towards it as strong as i thought it would have. I thought the characters were very well developed by Golding but there wasn't enough dialogue between them. The four main characters in the book are , Ralph, Jack, Piggy and Simon. Jack is the only one cf the characters who changes drastically from the beginning becoming more and more barbaric as the novel progresses. Plus you cant really sense the amount of time that has passed from the beginning of the novel to its end. Also i think the extent to which the boys went barbaric was out of reality. Boys at 12 yrs old probably wouldn't have killed a couple of the other boys..maybe one the most and most likely by accident.
The book i think is best for classes to show how kids react to the absence of adult authority. The book I think becomes a bore and I felt like i could care less about what happens to Piggy or Ralph. It seemed to drag at times when i was reading it.

I'll rate it a 3/5 because it showed how much kids could change and it was interesting to see how there could be two very different parties on an island of stranded boys. But it seemed to drag at times and was never successful in making me read more and more as other novels have done.

The captivating novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, is one that will capture the reader instantly and ensnare them in a world of terror in its rawest form: pure humanity.

The novel opens on a seemingly harmless setting, a group of schoolboys stranded on an island. All goes well in the beginning, and Golding leads the reader to believe that all will be well. The little'uns will be comforted, the makeshift government will do for now, they will all be rescued and live happily ever after. This is not so.

The picture that Golding paints for us instead is one of harsh realism that will instill a chilling fear within the reader's bones; from the brutal sacrifices and torture, to the simple struggle we've seen so many times before, good vs. evil, reflected into the eyes and hearts of children, Golding's story will never dissapoint.

I had the pleasure of reading Lord of the Flies in my freshman year of high school and would recommend it to every high school reader and above. The complex and captivating symbolism that Golding uses in Lord of the Flies is one that younger readers in the middle school age cannot comprehend, for it's the symbolism that makes Lord of the Flies such a captivating read. Golding shows us through a seemingly innocent vessel, children, just how the human race is anything but innocent, and how easily chaos can ensue when our thin fabric of control is lifted away.

The story is one that will terrify readers, and for that reason I would recommend it to everyone so that we cannot forget just how close and real that state of chaos is.

Lord of the Flies is absolutely one of the best books I have ever read. It's symbolism and imagery are probably too advanced for someone who is not an avid reader, but if you love a challenge and are looking for a great book to read, this is the one for you.

I bought this book a year ago and I only read it now because I was so busy at school, but now is our vacation and this is the first thing I've done. I'm sixteen and I have to read the book twice. The first time I read it, I already liked it. The good point of the book is that I can very well relate to the characters. I felt sympathy for all of them even for Jack. It is realistic in the sense that that is how boys act. But when the other boys hunt or turn into savages are not quite realistic, I think that it is where the author and the reader's creativity and understanding should come out. I think that he put this attitude to the boys to add more color and he really meant to exaggerate it so we can see it clearly. My favorite thing is that the author is very creative in writing and he expresses and describes everything with colors. I suggest that if you read this book, you should try to visualize, imagine and picture every detail of what the author writes so you would appreciate the book more. Try to put yourself in the scene. Because the book is not really more on the plot but on how everything felt. How it is like to be in that place, how does it felt when you were told you were like that. I must also say that it is very touching how the young boys seem so young but still they think and understand. They feel and see things and resolve it. Some says that the end is quite disappointing and I was also a bit disappointed but I think that's where our imagination will take place and it's up to us to put the resolution. Though I have to read the book again because I feel that I am missing something out.

A very interesting story of how everyone can lose their minds, turning some turn into savages and others into animals. Good suspense. Great addition to the utopia/dystopia genre.

The book was awesome. I want to see another move made exactly like Golding wrote it.

The Lord of the Flies was bittersweet for me. Here's some reasons why.

I loved what Golding was doing here. I loved how he portrayed innocent schoolboys turning into violent savages. At first, the boys set up a democracy of sorts, by voting for Ralph as their leader. That is soon destroyed, with Jack being the catalyst. He started out as a boy who think rules are necessary, to one who thinks they are nonsense. And some of their ritual scenes were downright insane, especially the one involving Simon. The fact that the Lord of the Flies is in all of them is interesting, too.

I also loved what Golding was saying about the adult world. Throughout most of the novel, the boys wish they had adults there to help guide them on the right path. However, in the skies above them, adults are killing each other because they can't agree on anything. Golding is showing that this is not a novel about how lack of adult supervision will lead kids to do bad things. It's about humanity as a whole. The boys represent different ideologies, and when those idologies don't agree, the inevitable solution is to fight.

However, I didn't care about the characters at all. Certain characters would die, and I honestly wouldn't care at all. Maybe it's becuase this is a short novel, and the reader wasn't given enough time to become emotionally attached to the characters. I know this is meant to be an allegory for human nature, and the characters are not the most important, but I still like to become attached to characters, and feel for them when they die.

The ending also left something to be desired. It just sort of dropped off. I get that the boys are leaving one world of chaos for another, but it was still a little disappointing.

Overall, I suggest you read it. I liked it, and think it's an important book to read.

One other important thing of note: In the scene where Jack and the gang are killing a mother pig, take note of Golding's diction. Does it remind you of something other than just a killing?