2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating portrait of a 'jobbing writer' of two centuries ago, January 21, 2010
This review is from: William Hazlitt: The First Modern Man (Hardcover)
I've long loved Hazlitt's essays, and one of my most cherished possessions is a first edition of his Surrey Institute lectures on the English poets. But until now I had waited in vain for a biography that would do justice to this remarkable figure and the world he inhabited.
Wu is unabashed partisan of Hazlitt (which is probably why he undertook this task in the first place; Hazlitt is one of those figures now largely overlooked, along with Leigh Hunt, as the spotlight shines on the Romantic poets rather than on their prose-writing counterparts) and that enthusiasm for sharing Hazlitt's side in any quarrel can sometimes become a bit wearying. (I'm a fan of Hazlitt's, but find it hard to muster up much enthusiasm for HIS enthusiasm for Napoleon, for instance.) But where Wu succeeds brilliantly is in bringing alive the spirit of the age in which Hazlitt lived and wrote: the era which saw the triumph of the American Revolution (some of his earliest years were spent in the just-born United States) and then the French Revolution, followed by a British crackdown on anything that smelled like 'subversion'. Wu's case for Hazlitt as the first 'modern' man rests on the fact that he saw clearly what could be: a world in which birthright did not determine status or success, and where a man (or woman) could succeed on his or her own merits without having to grovel and win patronage from his social superiors but intellectual inferiors.
A testimony to the power of this biography is the fact that weeks after reading it, the events that Wu describes -- Hazlitt's financial struggles, his occasional triumphs, his tendency to become his own worst enemy and his lack of discretion -- continue to resonate in my memory. I'll be reading or thinking about something completely different, and suddenly a stray word or idea will push my mind back to Hazlitt and his falling out with some of his earliest friends, such as Coleridge, or to his friendship with Charles and Mary Lamb, or his fascination with the theater and his ability to spot some of his era's biggest talents the first time they strode across the stage. Best of all, Wu captures the discomfort of a young man, raised in a non-conformist yet religious household, who loses his faith, who must carve out a place for himself as a 'jobbing writer' in a world that has no place for non-conformists, whether that non-conformity is religious or social in nature. While reading this, I feel as if I inhabited the streets in which my prized first edition was printed.
Even if you're not interested in Hazlitt the person, this book is a great introduction to his times -- his path crossed that of all the great literary figures of his generation, and he engaged in his writings all the major themes, from the need for 'gusto' in life to the individual experience of nature that was part of the romantic era. (Hazlitt himself, however, still strikes me as more professional skeptic than a classic Romantic -- or perhaps, a Curmudgeonly Romantic?) And even if you're not interested in reading about the late 18th and early 19th century literary world, do pick up some of Hazlitt's essays. They are, indeed, treasures in their own right.
Highly recommended to anyone interested in this era, and in the Romantic poets or essay-writing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The First?, February 28, 2009
This review is from: William Hazlitt: The First Modern Man (Hardcover)
A detailed academic biography of a long-dead English essayist and journalist. Professor Duncan Wu, while certainly an expert on his subject, comes across as an unwavering apologist for the difficult Mr. Hazlitt: a man who was a consistent financial deadbeat, who lacked good moral behavior toward women, who often was malicious in print towards friends and acquaintances, and who was a big fan of the dictator Napoleon.
That Mr. Hazlitt was an excellent writer and championed many good causes (e.g., attacking the emptiness of the British monarchy and supporting the right to free speech) hardly justifies him in having been a first-class jerk.
As for the subtitle of the book "The First Modern Man", it is quite a claim and one I think wildly overstated.
If you have a keen interest in William Hazlitt's life, read this book.
If not, which is probably most of the world, you can safely take a pass.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No