Most Helpful Customer Reviews
54 of 54 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Insightful and Provocative, September 1, 2007
This review is from: Wisdom of the Psyche: Depth Psychology after Neuroscience (Paperback)
As a person with nearly 20 years of experience in the Pharmaceutical industry (working in Neuroscience) and developing interests in depth-psychology, I was intrigued by the title of Ginette Paris' work: The Wisdom of the Psyche: Depth Psychology after Neuroscience. Her book, however, contained very little on "Neuroscience." It did however, contain a great deal on a variety of topics relative to depth psychology. Paris asks an important question; what is the future of depth psychology given the takeover from neuroscience and pharmacology? She answers that question by stepping back from the medical and psychodynamic models to engage the subject mater at an archetypal level relayed through her own personal and traumatic confrontation with death, the unconscious, and a miraculous recovery. Her experience is supported by a number of case histories from her practice. Paris takes a bold stance, stating that depth psychology is not to be lumped in with the sciences. While the field of depth psychology was discovered by scientists, taking a scientific approach, depth psychology is not a science. Thank You Ginette! Depth psychology is not a science because its subject matter, the psyche, is not amenable to reduction; psyche is not reproducible, verifiable, or willing to be contained, defined or restricted at any level. The field of depth psychology is closer to that of the humanities, where key to working with psyche is an ever evolving dynamic imagination. In reality depth psychology fits neither in the sciences or the humanities; it is In-Between, just as its fundamental intrinsic nature is In-Between. While I enjoyed all of Paris' book, I found her last chapter entitled "Joy: The Antidote to Anxiety" the most important for our society. Paris draws an important distinction between "fear" and "anxiety." While "fear" has an object, "anxiety" does not; the object of our anxiety is "hidden." Our society is a society suffering from anxiety (I would call it chronic, low-grade stress). Regardless of the terminology, anxiety shuts a person down and, I believe, suppresses the immune system resulting in an entire host of medical conditions that I as a neuroscientist have worked to develop drugs for (e.g., anxiety and depression). The role of anxiety in other disease states (e.g., cancer, heart disease, obesity, etc.), for which neuroscience does not concern itself, should not be overlooked. While anxiety shuts a person down and suppresses the immune system, fear calls for action (and, I believe, stimulates the immune system), flight or fight being the two basic instincts of survival. A millennia of evolution has provided our species with mechanisms for dealing with fear. We, however, do not seem to have developed an evolutionary response to anxiety. Paris addresses the problem of anxiety from the position of depth psychology, stating that, "anxiety comes with the loss of images." Paris tells us that, in our culture, we have replaced images with concepts and fear with anxiety. Our culture has worked very hard to free itself of oppressive mythologies, but unfortunately has distanced itself from the imagination that created those mythologies. The loss of imagination, necessary for the creation of vital invigorating mythologies (both collective and personal) is trauma for the psyche and disease for the body. Paris points out that it takes a healthy imagination--an artistic compromise--to balance the requirements of the ego with the orientation of the Self. Paris reminds us that this balancing (i.e., Individuation) is similar to what the Greeks would have called the lifelong quest for harmony. On a more personal note, I found, Paris' work as a valuable guide on my own journey of self-discovery. Of particular value, were the weaving of her own personal account and those of her clients into her discussion on the archetype of the Mother and the archetype of the Father. I feel that I would have saved a great deal of time (and money) had I had this information available to me during my own therapeutic process. I am not saying this book is or should be a replacement for "therapy." It is, however, a valuable aid in the therapeutic process and I recommend Ginette Paris' book to anyone on their inner journey of discovery.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
27 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Manifestation of Archetypal Psychology, January 3, 2008
This review is from: Wisdom of the Psyche: Depth Psychology after Neuroscience (Paperback)
I have already recommended this book to two people, neither is a therapist or a depth psychologist. I didn't want to put the book down once I began reading. The entry into the book and the experience of the Underworld is riveting. It never occurred to me that one would be so completely conscious when the body is so traumatized. Dr. Paris' writing about this journey takes you right along with her. There is mystery surrounding the loving care she receives from a Mexican woman attending her seriously damaged body, and who cares even more for her soul. And there is the miracle of healing that emerges from the deep love between the newly fragile mother and the strong daughter who takes charge. This story of a serious physical accident and its unlikely outcome opens the door to what cannot be touched by neuroscience. This is a wonderful book. It broadens our understanding of the ways in which the archetypal psychological perspective can benefit us both individually, and as participants in society. Dr. Paris' brilliance as an archetypal psychologist is plainly visible. The pages are filled with wisdom and insight, very creatively expressed. I highly recommend this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
41 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Professor Paris's panoramic wrecking ball, August 8, 2007
This review is from: Wisdom of the Psyche: Depth Psychology after Neuroscience (Paperback)
I am a Pacifica graduate (Depth Psychology) who teaches several psychology-related subjects at Bay Area campuses, and I plan to share with my students--particularly Depth Psych students at Sonoma State--some of my delight with Paris's clear, forcible writing. The book's title should probably be considered a point of departure because relatively little of the book deals with DP's relation to neuroscience, although it does begin there with a severe crack on the head. To me the book felt like an excursion through many layers and levels: psychology, philosophy, spirituality, myth, science, feminism (not really an "ism"), personal accounts, even therapy client narratives. Like psyche the book roams but without ever departing from its inherently self-organizing central motifs, one of which is how DP is to understand itself. What is its role in a world of DSM-style categorizations and in a nation like the U.S. where half the population lives on psychotropic medication? In part this book is a project of deconstruction. Its targets include organized religion's imagination-killing counterphobic emphasis on belief, the psychology/psychiatry industry's willingness to medicate symptoms instead of listening to them, unnecessary oppositions between cognitive-behavioral work and DP (I particularly appreciate this from having worked for six years with violent men referred for mandatory therapy), and therapy sold as a kind of secular salvation. Paris also criticizes the authoritarianism of exalting one theory over another: "Any ideology that tries to reduce words to their utilitarian or technical meaning turns out to be a totalitarian one." Her wit also shines through, as when she offhandedly remarks that literalists have ruined the word "miracle" for the rest of us. I finished the book thinking about its call to consider DP a separate realm of endeavor from "science," with the depth traditions more in league with the humanities than with the fantasy of objectivity. As a research instructor who teaches both quantitative and qualitative methods, I found myself wondering whether we need consider the paradigm laid down by Francis Bacon the only way to do real science. It seems to me that aligning DP with the humanities runs the risk of abandoning the definition of science to the positivists and materialists instead of challenging us to ask whether science can be, say, artistic, or literary, or more depth-oriented than crunching numbers. When Jung told himself he was a scientist, his anima disagreed and said he was doing art, true enough: but if the unconscious counterbalances the conscious mind's narrow focus, perhaps the truth was somewhere in between.... I was glad to see Pierre Janet mentioned. He seldom appears in the DP literature. It is unfortunate that despite Henri Ellenberger's own deconstructive work we have tended to believe Freud's description of Janet as wedded to physiology when in fact he created what might have been the first fully dynamic system of depth psychology and was among the first to listen to symptoms and conflicts for their symbolic modes of discourse. I hope Paris writes more about these topics because her mercifully jargon-freestyle of exposition is itself a graceful demonstration of her love for image and myth and depth. I plan to assign this book in some of my graduate courses. I've also read her other books and warmly recommend them too.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
