Buy Used
$4.28
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: FREE SHIPPING w/AMAZON PRIME!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Wittgenstein's Poker: The Story of a Ten-Minute Argument Between Two Great Philosophers Hardcover – October 23, 2001


See all 10 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$2.24 $0.01

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In October 1946, philosopher Karl Popper arrived at Cambridge to lecture at a seminar hosted by his legendary colleague Ludwig Wittgenstein. It did not go well: the men began arguing, and eventually, Wittgenstein began waving a fire poker toward Popper. It lasted scarcely 10 minutes, yet the debate has turned into perhaps modern philosophy's most contentious encounter, largely because none of the eyewitnesses could agree on what happened. Did Wittgenstein physically threaten Popper with the poker? Did Popper lie about it afterward? BBC journalists Edmonds and Eidinow use the controversy as a springboard to probe the whys and whats of these two great thinkers, weaving biography, journalism and philosophy to produce one of the year's most entertaining and intellectually rich books. The authors show that the debate was a clash at several levels. First, of personalities: each was "bullying, aggressive, intolerant and self-absorbed"; in other words, accustomed to winning and unlikely to back down. Second, of class: Wittgenstein was an Austrian aristocrat, Popper was bourgeoisie (each fled Vienna to escape Hitler). And third, of ideas: Wittgenstein believed that philosophy boiled down to nothing more than a series of linguistic puzzles, while Popper thought philosophy involved real problems that immediately affected the world at large. Clearly, the stakes were high for both men in that lecture hall especially because their common mentor, the aging icon Bertrand Russell, was also in attendance. The debate thus took on the character of a succession for the throne. Tightly constructed and extraordinarily well written, this is a marvelous blend of lay and academic scholarship. It has every chance of becoming a classic of its kind. (Nov.)Forecast: Smart, general readers will gobble up this latest addition to narrative nonfiction. It will surely find a place for itself among The Professor and the Madman and An Eternal Golden Braid.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Booklist

*Starred Review* Here is ivory-tower drama at its crackling best. On Cambridge University's campus in 1946, two of the twentieth century's most notable philosophers, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Karl Popper, squared off in an intense 10-minute exchange rumored to have led to Wittgenstein brandishing a red-hot poker. What actually happened in this now-legendary clash, and how it reflects the development of philosophy and the times, is what Edmonds and Eidinow set out to discover. Wittgenstein came to the encounter with a reputation as a "charismatic genius." Popper, by contrast, presented a mundane picture, his academic life falling in the shadow of Wittgenstein, whose views on philosophy he fiercely derided. Both men were of Jewish extraction, displaced from Austria by the Nazi takeover. But Wittgenstein's wealth had allowed him freedoms denied the more middle class Popper. Feelings from all these myriad gulfs spilled over into the Cambridge encounter. The authors' profiling of the audience, which included Bertrand Russell, further illuminates what stoked the philosophical fires that day. Moving quickly from one brief chapter to another, Edmonds and Eidinow bring rich interpretation to the extraordinary incident, a BBC documentary on which is in the making. Philip Herbst
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Ecco; 1st edition (October 23, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0066212448
  • ISBN-13: 978-0066212449
  • Product Dimensions: 5 x 1.2 x 7.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (115 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,102,546 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

You can see why the book is fun to read.
"richterdj"
In 1946 two great 20th century philosophers, Wittgenstein and Karl Popper, came together for the first and only time in a loud, aggressive difference of philosophies.
Midwest Book Review
The authors drop little tidbits of description throughout the book so that when the final confrontation comes, there's not much left to reveal.
Spencer Case

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

21 of 23 people found the following review helpful By Bruce Crocker on February 17, 2002
Format: Hardcover
Wittgenstein's Poker by Dave Edmonds & John Eidinow, a distant cousin to The Metaphysical Club by Louis Menand, is a good book, but not a great book. The book is a parallel biography of two of the most important philosophers of the 20th Century, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Karl Popper. The book starts with the one meeting between the two philosophers, which ended with Wittgenstein wielding a fire poker at Popper. I was originally going to give the book a full 5 stars, but I feel the ending let me down. I was expecting the authors to tie all the disparate threads followed in the book together better than they did, but was disappointed when the book just whimpered to an end, especially after such a clever beginning. I would still recommend the book to folks interested in philosophy, Wittgenstein, Popper, and the history of the first half of the 20th Century. If I could, I'd give the book a 4.4 stars. ...
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
28 of 32 people found the following review helpful By suspectre on January 14, 2002
Format: Hardcover
This was a fun read and I devoured it in about three days. It provided fascinating biographical and historical details and it was decent overview of the philosophical issues of the time. Yet I came away feeling a little short-changed. The book didn't offer a very clear view of Wittgenstein's philosophy, how he used it and how he applied it. The same perhaps could be said of the book's characterization of Popper but I knew much more about Popper coming in. Finally, the book never really provides a blow-by-blow account of the argument -- Popper said this, Wittgenstein responded with that, Popper replied thusly, and so on. It seems like that at least a speculative paraphrasing of the argument would have been possible given the research the authors did. I was disappointed they didn't even try. All I came away with was a general idea of what the argument was about -- philosophical problems versus puzzles -- and the atmosphere of the scene at Cambridge. I wanted more.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
40 of 48 people found the following review helpful By Dennis M. Clark on February 5, 2002
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
The authors present an entertaining overview of some of the more interesting people in 20th century philosophy, especially highlighting the way Bertrand Russell, Karl Popper, and Ludwig Wittgenstein interacted. The background on Vienna is especially nice. However, this book is journalism, not philosophy, even though the publisher's blurb claims that it is an engaging mix of "philosophy, history, biography, and literary detection". None of the major philosophical problems, positions, or puzzles are presented in any depth; usually the authors hop to the next topic just as the material is getting challenging, rather than trying to engage the reader in something intellectually satisfying. They even present us with an example of the technical logical notation of Bertrand Russell (again, just as it's starting to get good) but then offer no explanation of the elements of the example, leaving the reader wondering why they bothered to show it, as if expecting a "Gee, whiz" reaction but no interest in knowing more.
There are also some curious passages where the authors make some remarkable assertions with no substantiation for them. For example, on page 239, they state that "Capitalism has not led to a greater concentration of wealth into fewer and fewer hands." They are very vague about whether they are contesting that capitalism has caused this situation (defensible) or whether they think that this has not actually happened (incredible). To make it worse, it's hard to tell whether Popper is making the assertion or the authors. Such vagueness is hardly philosophy.
Page 291 has some writing which is more typical of a television documentary than a serious book.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on February 21, 2002
Format: Hardcover
I'm quite familiar with both Wittgentein's and Popper's work and I found the discussion of their Austria-Jewish roots quite interesting. Nevertheless, I felt the authors were creating a false controversy between the two philophers. The more interesting personal issue was Popper's obsession with Wittgenstein who was essentially oblivious to Popper's existence. The authors admitted as much, but still set the book up as a kind of "high noon" shoot out. Wittgenstein had much bigger fish to fry than Popper, notwithstanding how the authors tried to equate the importance of the two philosophers. The authors erroneously talked about how Popper dealt with the big problems while Wittgenstein dealt with puzzles. Indeed, Wittgenstein dealt elegantly with some of the more profound issues in epistemology such as skepticism, the limits of language/thought etc. Wittgenstein is sui generis, one of the most original thinkers of the 20th century. His work has hardly any progenitors (save perhaps Frege) while Popper, although making some interesting contributions to the sociology of science, built his work directly from/reacting to his predecessors. (not a bad thing, but not in the same league as Wittgenstein). I would also have liked to have seen, as mentioned in other reviews more explication of the philosophy of Popper and Wittgenstein, similar to what Monk has done in his excellent biographies of Russell and Wittgenstein. Further, the discussion on how Popper's idea of a free society has actually come into existence is simple minded, triumphalist clap trap that takes away from the good things in this book.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Frequently Bought Together

Wittgenstein's Poker: The Story of a Ten-Minute Argument Between Two Great Philosophers + 13 Things That Don't Make Sense: The Most Baffling Scientific Mysteries of Our Time
Buy the selected items together