10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Warning. Spoilers Ahead, August 21, 2010
I really can't begin to express how disappointed I was with this book. I'd already read enticer from Book 2 and so had a pretty good idea of what Book 3, this book, was about. It sounded pretty good. The ultimate show down between the two most powerful wizards for 10,000 years.
So what happens?
For the first 50-100 pages, it argue argue argue, bicker bicker bicker, with a tidgen of teenage love angst.
For pages 100-150, they get an unexpected surprise from a visitor from another universe, while still arguing and bickering.
For pages 150 to 350, it's argue argue argue, bicker bicker bicker.
For pages 350 to 490, it's Alternate Gerald's an evil guy, the heroes of our universe cross over to save "Good" Gerald, amidst argue argue argue, bicker bicker bicker.
For pages 490-500, there's an improbably and very sudden complete defeat of "Evil" Gerald by "Good" Gerald, although I think it's done in a way that still allows the "Evil" Gerald to return for a subsequent novel.
Overall, too much arguing and bickering, and too little real plot, and very little real action. The finale was one of the biggest letdown's I've ever read. There was potential for hundreds of pages of fighting between Good and Evil Gerald. But no. It's over in a couple of pages. And the victory by "Good" Gerald seems unlikely given how powerful "Evil" Gerald is depicted to be.
Overall it's not a good book. I think I'm generous giving it 3 stars.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
She can and has done much better, October 8, 2010
If it was another author I would give it a 4 instead of a three, but I know the author can and has done much better. This was almost entirly a recap of the first book revisiting Gerald to his dragon making, only he goes power hungry instead of restraining himself. the first half of the book is almost identical to the last half of the first, and the plot seemed some what predictable. the book did have its moments, and did not turn me off the series in the least, but I know the author is much more capable than what was displayed in this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing --- guess I'm dropping out of the series, February 1, 2011
It's hard to express how disappointing this was. The second in the series wasn't as good as the first, but that didn't bother me too much--lots of trilogies sag a bit in the middle.
You potential readers can see the cover, with its blurb: "Gerald by name. Evil by nature." You may think you'll be getting a subtle exploration into the ways that Gerald, once the quintessential Little Guy, gradually becomes corrupted by the tremendous power he now possesses. If so, I'm afraid I must disabuse you. It's actually about an eeevil Gerald from a parallel universe, who became eeevil when he read some forbidden grimoires. Seriously. A parallel universe. In fact, a lot of the first third or so of the book is text from the last quarter of the first book.
That's just the premise. As for the actual plot, there isn't much. I'll try to avoid spoilers by saying simply that Good Gerald defeats Evil Gerald by doing something which was utterly trivial for him to do (three words) and should have been barely a hiccup for Evil Gerald.
Originally this was marketed as the Rogue Agent "trilogy," but the end of this one says there may be more. If so, I guess I'll pass. It's a pity; I liked Gerald and pals when I first met them.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No