• List Price: $39.99
  • Save: $6.24 (16%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by hippo_books
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Item qualifies for FREE shipping and Prime! This item is used.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Women in the Military: Flirting With Disaster Hardcover – December 1, 1997

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$3.30 $0.01

Frequently Bought Together

Women in the Military: Flirting With Disaster + Deadly Consequences: How Cowards are Pushing Women into Combat
Price for both: $51.36

Buy the selected items together


Engineering & Transportation Books
Discover books for all types of engineers, auto enthusiasts, and much more. Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 390 pages
  • Publisher: Regnery Publishing; First Edition edition (December 1, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0895263769
  • ISBN-13: 978-0895263766
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (44 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,059,826 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

The disaster Mitchell deplores has so far been on an individual scale: a few suicides, forced retirements and discharges, and the trials of drill sergeants. This litany is hardly a bill of good organizational health, and the public policy question has thus become whether to press forward with gender integration of the armed forces--or to pause and reconsider the wisdom of the effort. Conservatives such as Mitchell take succor from second thoughts emerging from such neoliberal tastemakers as columnist Richard Cohen of the Washington Post. Mitchell, hardly a guarded writer, disputes every argument ever put forward to open the military services to women, and for evidence he reviews most of the studies and commissions that have examined the issue since the 1970s. This information underlies the claims bruited about amid sensational media flaps (les affaires Hultgreen and Flinn). Mitchell's well-researched, though opinionated, book can be balanced with a benign view of the issue, Ground Zero: The Gender Wars in the Military by Linda B. Francke . Gilbert Taylor

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Brian Mitchell's "Women in the Miliary - flirting with disaster" is excellent.
He pretty much views females as parasites that leech off and destroy an otherwise well functioning society when they decide to leave the kitchen and put on some shoes.
Mitchell distorts the truth (something he ironically accuses feminists of doing) and makes claims for which he has no basis.
Steven Moulton

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

25 of 32 people found the following review helpful By Paul J. Walkowski on February 10, 1998
Format: Hardcover
Brian Mitchell's book deserves but, probably won't get the serious attention it deserves, due to its politically incorrect theme. Nevertheless, this book is a compelling and well-written study of a controversial policy which needs to be reviewed top-to-bottom. Once congress required the military to apply civilian "equal protection" standards to jobs in the military, the foundation was laid for an "Allice-in-Wonderland" transformation which got "curiouser and curiouser" the more it was enforced. Mitchell minces no words, and backs up what he says with enough detailed information to convince all but the most hardened that America's incomprehensible move toward androgyny is a mistake of fatal proportions. Highly recommended. A fast and troubling read.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 36 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on September 1, 1998
Format: Hardcover
A book for the ages, telling us what we have all known from the start and/or experienced first hand in combat and garrison. And something that all those special interest groups and womens rights finatics have hidden, ignored or covered up for decades. The reason this book is so important is that many of us (myself included) who have served our country in the military already know what Mr. Brian Michell is writing about. The truth that he is trying to get out from under the stone that the feninist have successfully hidden it under. If the report says no...hide it, if the report says it degrades our readiness...obsure it. If the report says we can't or shouldn't try to make this work, throw out the report and start over. Find an ear that will ignore the truth. Even at the cost of our readiness, the lives of our sons and daughters, and a reduction in our preparedness. It is shamefully clear by Mitchell that our Presidents of the past have gone along with this farse for votes. Clearly unsatisfactory. It is a masterful job of telling the world what really happens when you mix men and women in trainning and in combat. Disaster. I have seen this in a 27 year United States Marine Corps Career. Enlisted, Warrant Officer and Commissioned Officer. Thank God that Brian Mitchelle has come along to vindicate our own cries for relieve from this disaster. And thank goodness that a company would even publish it. Lives are going to be lost, and the feminist are willing to sacrifice the many for just a few. Better yet to simply push their agenda, that is not wanted by real women in America. Perhaps Saving Private Ryan will give all women cause to rethink and understand why men are opposed to this idea. A must read for any man or women who is really serious about finding out the true effect an unprecedented increase in female participation in the military will cause.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Neil Edward Harvey on February 21, 2013
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book is very prejudiced as might be expected and dwells extensively on some of the physical strength capabilities of women which are true but also fails to give adequate respect to their strong mental contributions. Thre are plenty of jobs in the military that women are willing to do and can likely do much better than men due to a lack of interest of men to do those jobs. Recently combat positions have been opened to women. This may seem shocking to some but women are now exposed to combat realities in combat areas regardless of the job types they serve in and they perceived their status as noncompetitive in the recognitions required for advancement. Whether this is good or not is still open to consideration and opinions. Men have long been seen as the protectors of women and this will take some getting use to by those serving together. The effects of seeing women mangled or killed in combat or taken as prisioners of war are still out by in large to U.S. Soldiers but not uncommon to many foreign armies. However stating that women should not be in the military is ovelooking their contributions and close to stating that women should not be in society either.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
33 of 48 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on February 13, 1998
Format: Hardcover
What's more important when the two following goals are in conflict: Good of the military versus good of women in the military? Mitchell frames his argument explicitly supporting the former. As a current Air Force officer, I agree with Mitchell that, no matter where you stand with regard to women's contribution to military readiness, the military's needs MUST come first. One-armed-men are not allowed to enter Navy SEAL training. Why? Because they can not do the job given their physical limitations. Is this discrimination? You bet it is. Is it necessary to maintain efficiency of our military? You bet it is. Quotes Mitchell in his book, "there is no equal opportunity in war." Feminist proponents of "GI Jane" fantasies like to first pretend that women can do any job that men can do. Hit in the face that this is not the case, their fall back position is that most combat is now of the Nintendo, push-button-only variety. Hit in the face that this is not true either, they simply rest their case on the need for women's advancement, no matter the cost of readiness. To follow their chain of reasoning, one-armed-men deserve the opportunity to advance to the rank of general as much as women do, since being able to do the job is irrelevant. Mitchell makes a good case that we may be close to having feminists admit they feel this way (openly admitting that readiness should be secondary to careers of women in the military), if only because there is no other justification for the widely ranging roles women play in the military today. Other than opportunities for women, there is NO SINGLE SUPPORTABLE REASON for women to be permitted into jobs they are physically incapable of doing.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?