| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From director J.J. Abrams comes the next installment in the Star Trek saga, Star Trek Into Darkness. See it at Cinemark theaters now and pre-order on Blu-ray, 3D Blu-ray, DVD, and the Exclusive Starfleet Phaser Gift Set. Shop Star Trek Into Darkness and more in the Star Trek Store. Learn more |
Frequently Bought Together
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Special Features
None.
Editorial Reviews
Review
the much-anticipated pic has striking moments comparable to the best of Neshat s potent imagery... --Variety
...you have a feature film that s a must-see in the international festival and art-house circuit --LA Times
This beautifully shot film, set in Tehran during the period leading up to the 1953 coup which toppled the democratically elected government, is a quiet and understated look at the lives of four very different women s struggle for freedom. --London Times
...you have a feature film that s a must-see in the international festival and art-house circuit --LA Times
This beautifully shot film, set in Tehran during the period leading up to the 1953 coup which toppled the democratically elected government, is a quiet and understated look at the lives of four very different women s struggle for freedom. --London Times
Product Description
WOMEN WITHOUT MEN is Shirin Neshat's independent film adaptation of Shahrnush Parsipur's magic realist novel. The story chronicles the intertwining lives of four Iranian women during the summer of 1953; a cataclysmic moment in Iranian history when an American led, British backed coup d'état brought down the democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, and reinstalled the Shah to power.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
Having read the novella, I was curious as to how the film would function without the girl Mahdokht turning into the tree and then to seed scattering in the wind. Shahrnush Parsipur, the author of the novella writes in a magical realism style akin to Marquez and the South American writers. The film managed quite well without that episode and still managed to have a dreamlike quality from beginning to end by use of predominantly black and white except for a few injections of color at strategic moments.The former prostitute Zarrinkolab, being painfully thin and speechless throughout the entire film had a surreal quality to it. It turns out in real life she is a Hungarian actress and couldn't speak Farsi. Especially the garden had a ghostly quality to it with its diagonal rows of tall thin trees. They actually filmed three different gardens to get the effects. The film gave a greater emphasis to the Mossadegh theme which was only an historic reference point in the book and it showed that women's involvement in politics in Iran is not a new phenomena. Women have been political activists in Iran for several centuries because they have more at stake. The soldiers in black and the protestors in white like a chess game also had quite a dramatic effect and obvious symbolism.
Some newspaper critics here in the US found the film depressing and only of interest to Iranian expats but I think they missed the point. The discrimination and repression of women is not something unique to Iran, nor is rape and prostitution and the currency of the symbolism used had universal appeal and a familiarity to Western icons. Shirin Neshat mentioned to us at a discussion group at Stanford University that the scene of the former prostitute Zarrinkolab lying unconscious on her back floating in the middle of the pond was borrowed from Ophelia. Shahrnush said that the title of the book "Women Without Men" was taken from Hemingway's book "Men Without Women." The point of the book and the film were not to put men in a bad light but rather to show the world from women's perspectives. The nuturing healer and person with the most moral integrity and loyalty in the story was actually the male gardener. He was like a father figure. The new owner of the country house, the socialite Farrokhlaga, was portrayed very true to the book and to life especially the silent pain you can see in her eyes that she endures when the man she has secretly always been in love with showed up for her soirre with a younger American fiance.
Shirin Neshat mentioned at the Stanford University discussion group that the film was shot entirely in Morocco and they had to enlist the Moroccan Army as the soldier extras in the film and she jokingly said that it was probably the most action the army had seen in years. I loved the scene of the Shah's military crashing the elegant dinner party at the country house looking for the dissident Munis and ending up with their captain drinking with the guests and reciting poetry. This is so typically Iranian, that people of every walk of life, no matter how good or bad can recite poetry.
And the finale with the leftist political activist Munis embracing and crying over the dead body of the Shah's young soldier, who had been killed by one of her colleagues, to me was the symbol of mother Iran trying to heal her disparate children. As Shirin Neshat pointed out in the discussion, in the post election protests of last summer 2009, women could be seen intervening to protect protesting men from being beaten by police and also shielding defeated policemen from being beaten by the angry mob. Despite the impression in the West, women are far from passive in Iran.
Two other points of departure between the novel and the film, are that Farrokhlaga does not push her pompous overbearing general husband off the balcony to his death at the start of the film like she does in the book and Faizeh does not become the second wife of Munis' sanctimonious brother, Amir. Shahrnush who does not consider herself a feminist was describing a real phenomena of polygamy which occurs in certain societies which I believe has a correlation to poverty but Shirin couldn't bring herself to casting Faizeh into such a passive role and instead shows her defiantly telling her would be spouse that she has no interest in becoming servant to his third and younger wife some day just as he was suggesting his current wife would be to her...
I think this film is well worth seeing and it goes beyond merely Iranian themes and interests. It has a universal appeal to it as well as being a cinematographic piece of artwork. It has been my privilege to have become friends both with Shahrnush Parsipur and Shirin Neshat over the past few years. Shahrnush spent many years in jail under both the Pahlavi regime and the IRI and her writing has been banned in Iran mostly for speaking candidly of women's issues. Shirin Neshat cannot return to Iran under the current regime and her work has also been banned there. Life in exhile is not easy and it has a surreal quality to it as well. I was very proud of Shirin Neshat when she received the Golden Lion Award at the Venice Biennial last year and I thought that Shahrnush's acting debut was quite convincing as a Madame. I wish that more of her novels would be translated into English and I hope that Shirin will make many more films. This was her first full length feature film. In Shirin's own words she said that she was amazed that a film about Iran had found main stream distribution at all in the USA. She has been on tour for the past three weeks at screenings in Europe where I am sure it will find a wide audience. The film was actually financed by European producers due to lack of interest here.
I wish both these women all the best.
Some newspaper critics here in the US found the film depressing and only of interest to Iranian expats but I think they missed the point. The discrimination and repression of women is not something unique to Iran, nor is rape and prostitution and the currency of the symbolism used had universal appeal and a familiarity to Western icons. Shirin Neshat mentioned to us at a discussion group at Stanford University that the scene of the former prostitute Zarrinkolab lying unconscious on her back floating in the middle of the pond was borrowed from Ophelia. Shahrnush said that the title of the book "Women Without Men" was taken from Hemingway's book "Men Without Women." The point of the book and the film were not to put men in a bad light but rather to show the world from women's perspectives. The nuturing healer and person with the most moral integrity and loyalty in the story was actually the male gardener. He was like a father figure. The new owner of the country house, the socialite Farrokhlaga, was portrayed very true to the book and to life especially the silent pain you can see in her eyes that she endures when the man she has secretly always been in love with showed up for her soirre with a younger American fiance.
Shirin Neshat mentioned at the Stanford University discussion group that the film was shot entirely in Morocco and they had to enlist the Moroccan Army as the soldier extras in the film and she jokingly said that it was probably the most action the army had seen in years. I loved the scene of the Shah's military crashing the elegant dinner party at the country house looking for the dissident Munis and ending up with their captain drinking with the guests and reciting poetry. This is so typically Iranian, that people of every walk of life, no matter how good or bad can recite poetry.
And the finale with the leftist political activist Munis embracing and crying over the dead body of the Shah's young soldier, who had been killed by one of her colleagues, to me was the symbol of mother Iran trying to heal her disparate children. As Shirin Neshat pointed out in the discussion, in the post election protests of last summer 2009, women could be seen intervening to protect protesting men from being beaten by police and also shielding defeated policemen from being beaten by the angry mob. Despite the impression in the West, women are far from passive in Iran.
Two other points of departure between the novel and the film, are that Farrokhlaga does not push her pompous overbearing general husband off the balcony to his death at the start of the film like she does in the book and Faizeh does not become the second wife of Munis' sanctimonious brother, Amir. Shahrnush who does not consider herself a feminist was describing a real phenomena of polygamy which occurs in certain societies which I believe has a correlation to poverty but Shirin couldn't bring herself to casting Faizeh into such a passive role and instead shows her defiantly telling her would be spouse that she has no interest in becoming servant to his third and younger wife some day just as he was suggesting his current wife would be to her...
I think this film is well worth seeing and it goes beyond merely Iranian themes and interests. It has a universal appeal to it as well as being a cinematographic piece of artwork. It has been my privilege to have become friends both with Shahrnush Parsipur and Shirin Neshat over the past few years. Shahrnush spent many years in jail under both the Pahlavi regime and the IRI and her writing has been banned in Iran mostly for speaking candidly of women's issues. Shirin Neshat cannot return to Iran under the current regime and her work has also been banned there. Life in exhile is not easy and it has a surreal quality to it as well. I was very proud of Shirin Neshat when she received the Golden Lion Award at the Venice Biennial last year and I thought that Shahrnush's acting debut was quite convincing as a Madame. I wish that more of her novels would be translated into English and I hope that Shirin will make many more films. This was her first full length feature film. In Shirin's own words she said that she was amazed that a film about Iran had found main stream distribution at all in the USA. She has been on tour for the past three weeks at screenings in Europe where I am sure it will find a wide audience. The film was actually financed by European producers due to lack of interest here.
I wish both these women all the best.
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
Exiled Iranian visual artist and now filmmaker, Shirin Neshat interprets the 1989 novella "Women Without Men" by Shahrnush Parsipur, also an Iranian exile. Both women have attempted movingly to portray the oppression of women in Iran. Set in 1953 during the CIA-backed overthrow of the democratically elected government, led by Mohammed Mossadegh, the film also has a political message. It is dedicated to Iranians whose lives have been lost in struggles for independence there since the turn of the last century.
The women of the title are all abused and betrayed in some way by men. Middle-class and middle-aged Zinat is trapped in a stultifying marriage to an Army officer, who berates her for her creative talents (she is a poet and singer) and threatens to take a second, younger wife. Thirty-year-old Munis is absorbed by current political events but is brow-beaten by a brother who wants her married off as soon as possible. Meanwhile, her friend Faezeh has the misfortune of being found alone in the streets by two men who rape her. Zarin, a shudderingly anorexic young prostitute, barely tolerates her male customers, who treat her brutally, but recoils in horror when she discovers that one of them lacks a face. Zinat leaves her husband and acquires a rural property - a huge old house with extensive gardens where two of the other women join her in retreat from the rest of the world. A kindly gardener attends to them, but otherwise it is their world without men.
The tone of Parsipur's novella is darkly humorous and finally hopeful, but the film is more elegiac. It parts company with the novel as public protests in the streets mount, calling to mind demonstrations we have seen in 1979 and again in 2009. Munis, escaping from her home, by means of an episode of magical realism (also a recurring device in the novella), joins a cell of young leftists. But the triumph of the military and the collapse of the government as invited guests gather for an evening at the house, dictate the narrative outcomes for the characters. The resolution of the film reflects the erosion of hope for Iranian women in the 20 years since the book was written. This is a gracefully told and beautifully photographed film. Location footage, the use of muted colors, and the haunting music track make it a richly moving experience.
The women of the title are all abused and betrayed in some way by men. Middle-class and middle-aged Zinat is trapped in a stultifying marriage to an Army officer, who berates her for her creative talents (she is a poet and singer) and threatens to take a second, younger wife. Thirty-year-old Munis is absorbed by current political events but is brow-beaten by a brother who wants her married off as soon as possible. Meanwhile, her friend Faezeh has the misfortune of being found alone in the streets by two men who rape her. Zarin, a shudderingly anorexic young prostitute, barely tolerates her male customers, who treat her brutally, but recoils in horror when she discovers that one of them lacks a face. Zinat leaves her husband and acquires a rural property - a huge old house with extensive gardens where two of the other women join her in retreat from the rest of the world. A kindly gardener attends to them, but otherwise it is their world without men.
The tone of Parsipur's novella is darkly humorous and finally hopeful, but the film is more elegiac. It parts company with the novel as public protests in the streets mount, calling to mind demonstrations we have seen in 1979 and again in 2009. Munis, escaping from her home, by means of an episode of magical realism (also a recurring device in the novella), joins a cell of young leftists. But the triumph of the military and the collapse of the government as invited guests gather for an evening at the house, dictate the narrative outcomes for the characters. The resolution of the film reflects the erosion of hope for Iranian women in the 20 years since the book was written. This is a gracefully told and beautifully photographed film. Location footage, the use of muted colors, and the haunting music track make it a richly moving experience.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
Throughout this remarkable film -- along with exquisite natural dioramas -- I subliminally focused on its star turn of Water. Whether as first request of female pilgrim to no-mans-land sanctuary (a drink of water) or sacred and isolated grotto, this pristine fluid proffered solace for healing the feminine from male abuse.
Slaking thirst, purifying, submerging, containing, nurturing, perhaps water's role since the beginning of time -- even in the cultural stories we tell ourselves. (For example, remembering Mary Magdalene's washing the feet of Jesus)
And may explain why women almost universally will chose a bathtub over a shower - when given the option.
The images and cinematography within "Woman without Men" -- by two talented and courageous Iranian women -- spring from and speak to (my) intuition, so ineffable. Best let them talk to yours -- rather than attempt to pin down the numinous with words.
I highly recommend this topical film for both men and women, as we currently ratchet up our demonizing of Iran -- and justifications for disasterous sanctions (and perhaps war) -- against this hoary, precious poetic culture~
Slaking thirst, purifying, submerging, containing, nurturing, perhaps water's role since the beginning of time -- even in the cultural stories we tell ourselves. (For example, remembering Mary Magdalene's washing the feet of Jesus)
And may explain why women almost universally will chose a bathtub over a shower - when given the option.
The images and cinematography within "Woman without Men" -- by two talented and courageous Iranian women -- spring from and speak to (my) intuition, so ineffable. Best let them talk to yours -- rather than attempt to pin down the numinous with words.
I highly recommend this topical film for both men and women, as we currently ratchet up our demonizing of Iran -- and justifications for disasterous sanctions (and perhaps war) -- against this hoary, precious poetic culture~
Most Recent Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Haunting and Disturbing Reminder
For those familiar with the critically acclaimed film Persepolis which was an animated interpretation of the tragic events that led to the rise of radical Islam and fundamentalism... Read more
Published 14 days ago by zen-pc.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Great Movie About Women Taking Care of Women.
I love the movie. I saw it at an Iranian film festival at the Walker Art Center. I liked it so much that I bought my own copy. Read more
Published 4 months ago by Sharon D'Amico
1.0 out of 5 stars
dont waste your time and money
I was so excited for this dvd, i waited like 1 month to get it. after i received it and watched it, i got really disappointed. Read more
Published on March 26, 2011 by A. talebian
5.0 out of 5 stars
Cinematically Stunning As Well.
All of the previous reviews do a great job of politically and ideologically contextualizing this stunning first film by Neshat, so I just wanted to note something that may sadly be... Read more
Published on February 15, 2011 by scottallan
5.0 out of 5 stars
ONE OF THE GREATEST FILMS
There are so many fine films that have been made, and many masterpieces...this, to my taste, is one of the greatest.
I just saw the film. Read more
I just saw the film. Read more
Published on February 13, 2011 by Thomas M. Brod, MD
