The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy [Paperback]

N. A. M. Rodger (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: July 17, 1996

From the award-winning naval scholar N. A. M. Rodger comes the most revealing account yet of the mighty Georgian navy and British naval society of the eighteenth century.

Meticulously researched, Rodger's portrait draws the reader into this fascinatingly complex world with vivid, entertaining characters and full details of life below the decks. The Wooden World provides the most complete history of a navy at any age, and is sure to be an indispensable volume for all fans of Patrick O'Brian, English history, and naval history.

Editorial Reviews

Review

[Rodger] provides the reader with the most authoritative and enjoyable text on the subject that can be imagined. (Patrick O'Brian )

About the Author

N. A. M. Rodger is professor of naval history at Exeter University and a fellow of the British Academy. He is the author of The Wooden World and the highly acclaimed volumes of his naval history of Britain, The Safeguard of the Sea and The Command of the Ocean. He lives in England.

Product Details

• Paperback: 464 pages
• Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (July 17, 1996)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0393314693
• ISBN-13: 978-0393314694
• Product Dimensions: 8.1 x 5.5 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #371,577 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

33 of 34 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Very Good Book, January 16, 2002

By 

Tom Munro "tomfrombrunswick" (Melbourne, Victoria Australia) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (Paperback)

The writer of this book is an academic historian of some importance and he appears to be in the midst of writing a three volume history of the British navy. This book is a little more specalised and tells what it was like to serve on a British ship in the 18th Century.

The main theme of the book is to rebut academic theories which suggest that the British Navy of the period was run like a concentration camp. The author in some detail goes through the relations on ships and shows how the navy took a lot of care to preserve one of its key assets the sailors who manned the ships. Food was plentiful and of high quality or the time, British sailors worked out the cause of scurvey before medical science did. Care was taken to ensure that ships were clean and that sailors washed. The most interesting discussion is however on discipline. It would seem clear that in trials carried out to deterime the guilt of individual sailors, senior officers were very careful to establish the truth of charges and they were willing to aquit or to accept the sailors point of view. The book establishes that with a number of mutinies the Admirality removed incompetant officers from command and took no action against the men who mutinied, accpeting that the actions of the sailors was justified.

The author goes a long way to establishing that the reality of sea born life was one more or partnership rather than that of an oppresive regime.

The book however does more than this and describes in detail the tremendous organisational feat that was the Royal navy. It looks at all aspects of the navy from recruiting sailors, to feeding them and the reality of training and manning ships.

One finishes the book and relises what an achievment it was for England to be able to run such an effecient arm as the navy and how the way it was run led to the success it had in battle.

26 of 29 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic resource for mid-18th century British navy, May 5, 2002

By 

bookjunkiereviews (India) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (Paperback)

I am not an expert on the British navy by any means. I first encountered this book as a recommendation on a reading list for Patrick O'Brian fans (and I have just started to read O'Brian and other writers of nautical fiction). Since I had so many questions about the British navy, this book seemed like a great resource.

It is a great resource. No questions about that. Like Jane Austen's Letter, it sits next to my bed and I dip into it from time to time to figure out answers to X, Y, and Z. It is also a useful corrective to myths about the Navy as a floating prison camp, populated solely by thieves, criminals, and various escapees from normal life, and officered by brutal chaps like Bligh.

The book does not claim to be about the British navy in the time of Napoleon and Nelson (although the author occasionally makes references to events and problems of the last decade of the 18th century). For what it is, an analysis of the British navy in the mid-18th century, it is fantastic. Several institutions - such as the Admiralty and the Press gang - existed in this time (and prior to this time), and they carried over largely unreformed to the time of Nelson (and the fictional Aubrey & Maturin, and Hornblower etc).

There is one problem with it - for which I take off one star. That is the fact that British society and politics changed dramatically between the Seven Years War and the Napoleonic Wars, and this book cannot do justice to the problems of the British navy in the latter period. Which, unfortunately, just happens to be the period that all my favorite nautical books seem to be set in. Rodgers mentions this at one point (when he talks about the rigid social structure allowing the officers to be more relaxed about discipline and hierarchy). Unfortunately, he does not explore the corollary - that officers became sterner about hierarchy and more rigid about punishment and discipline as the social structure broke down under the influence of the Industrial Revolution, the French Revolution, and other factors.

There is one other problem. Rodgers talks about the fact that all officers were once ratings (what we consider sailors), and that even the Admirals of the Fleet had to serve for some years as ratings. Unfortunately, this statement rather glosses over the difference between being a captain's servant or a rating who was clearly officer-track and usually from a well-connected family, and a rating whose only hope was to rise to a petty officer if that. [Not to mention the impressed man with no nautical experience who might remain a landman until paid off]. I do not recollect the details of Nelson or Cochrane's service either, but I understand that at least one of them was carried on the books of a ship (or two) in name only until they attained the rank of midshipman. In short, they were never actually ratings - and Nelson in particular was promoted rapidly. At this point, the Navy is beginning to sound a bit like the British army.

The most interesting parts of the book for me were the descriptions of the ratings (the chapters on manning and discipline) and the descriptions of the officers. From the latter, I confirmed a theory that I had - that the Navy was a far better career choice for the younger son, or the son of an impoverished upper-class family, or the young man with no connections and no fortune. Rodgers does not discuss the background of the officers in great detail, but from other sources (Hibbert's biography of Nelson, for example), I learned that a substantial number of officers had clerical backgrounds (fathers who were clergymen) or parents who were professional men (surgeons, doctors, solicitors). I wonder though what proportion of them had a family member connected to the Navy, either in active service or working at the Admiralty. In any case, the career choices of men as diverse as Nelson (with a maternal uncle in the Navy, and as a younger son of a country clergyman) and Troubridge and Collingwood (men of no particular family and with no conenctions) was better explained.

One big myth remains - that brutal officers were the norm in the Navy. Rodgers takes great pains to dispell this idea, by pointing out that the Navy was far more lenient in practice than suggested by the Articles of War (or by anecdotes), that officers were not particular brutal (and in fact, brutal officers usually suffered damage to their career, not to mention going in fear of attack on shore), and that the choice of punishments aboard was limited. [Docking pay was not an option for example, when payments were in arrears of a month or longer].

The picture of the British navy as painted in THE WOODEN WORLD is quite a different picture painted by well-known stories such as Bligh and the Bounty, or films such as "Damn the Defiant!" Rodgers however does not explain how an officer such as Bligh (a brilliant navigator to be sure) became an Admiral. The problem lay, one suspects, in the system of promotion. Once a man became a captain, barring death or disgrace (resulting in being thrown out of the service), if he lived long enough, he would make Admiral. Becoming a captain was as much a matter of connections as it was of good luck and good seamanship and leadership. [This of course is well-known to lovers of the Hornblower and Aubrey-Maturin series].

I have several minor quibbles here and there, but this book is definitely a satisfying read, if somewhat hard to plough through at one sitting. After reading this, I felt better equipped to tackle the next Hornblower or Aubrey/Maturin novel.

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Puts Ambrose to shame, November 30, 2004

By 

Benjamin Huizenga "25 words or less" (Chicago, IL USa) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (Paperback)

This is the kind of in depth, focused history that we need. Basically a history of the men and institutional life of the British Sea Service from 1740 to 1770, Rodger uses a wide array of sources, official and personal, to accurately sketch an organization that has long suffered from erroneous observations. Although he is, I think, just a little biased towards the Navy as a benevolent progressive institution, especially the First Lord Anson, he has good and sound reasons for being so. This book goes a long way towards reminding us that conflicts and wars are fought not by nations, but by those nations' instruments of defense, whose membership often invisibly determines the fate of countries.