17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fair Critique of Naturalism, October 1, 2008
This review is from: World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism (Paperback)
One of the other reviews mentioned that this work is a philosophical and scientific argument for the Intelligent Design movement. All I have to say in response to this is, "What book were you reading?" ID is only discussed on a few pages, and Rea is not particularly in favor of the movement.
Michael Rea's work is a fair critique of Naturalism. Several things are worthy of note. First, chapters 2 and 3 are of particular interest as they provide a good historical understanding of Naturalism. Second, throughout the whole work Rea does something different than most critiques of Naturalism. Instead of claiming it as a metaphysical position or a philosophical worldview, Rea argues that Naturalism is best viewed as a methodological research program (sort of like the concept of a research program in contemporary philosophy of science). He claims that metaphysical naturalism is self-referentially incoherent, and for the sake of charity, it is best viewed as a research program. From this basis he offers a critique arguing that as a methodological research program it fails to account for important things like Realism about material objects, and Realism about other minds.
Anyone who is interested in Ontology, Naturalism, Theism, or the philosophy of science should give this book a read. It is philosophically challenging so if you are not willing to engage in extended arguments this work is not for you. If you are looking for cheap shots, name calling, and the like I would suggest going elsewhere.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very Highly Recommended, December 12, 2007
This review is from: World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism (Paperback)
World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism is a scholarly review (as one would expect from Oxford University Press) of the scientific and philosophical evidence for Intelligent Design by a Notre Dame professor. He concluded that William Dembski has so far developed the most effective method for detecting design in nature with his specified complexity system (page 216). He then does a good job of summarizing Dembski's argument. Rea also effectively shows the harm of naturalism in Western society today. His discussion of the critical importance of Darwin in the shift to naturalism, and the now open hostility to theism today, is also covered in some detail (see pages 30-31). Rea is very careful in his conclusions, all of which are well documented in 13 pages of references. His critique of Richard Dawkins, such as on page 120-121, is excellent, both fair and balanced, as is this whole book. One important role of this excellent work is to show how important Intelligent Design (i. e. the argument for intelligence from design) has been in Western civilization for the past 2000 years as well as before this time. The book also shows that the modern crusade against Intelligent Design is unfounded and actually irrational.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No