10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The REAL Worst-Case Scenario: Running Out of Ideas, March 16, 2007
This review is from: The Worst-Case Scenario Almanac: History (Paperback)
I've been a fan of this series since it began, and this marks the very first non-5-star rating I've ever given to one of these books. The reason? Let's start with the numbers.
What has always made these books stand out from the competition were the detailed worst-case scenarios, the expert-provided suggestions on how to deal with perhaps unlikely but all too real possibilities. Lots of imitators came up with various kinds of handbooks in response to their spectacular success, but this was the feature that "separated the men from the boys" if you will. In their first book
The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook they included 40 scenarios in 176 pages. All subsequent books had more, and their last book
The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: LIFE (Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbooks), the first of the double-sized ones, had 94 scenarios in 301 pages. THIS book manages a paltry 30 scenarios in 316 pages.
What fills up the rest of the book? A fairly pathetic attempt at a historical almanac of the "worst" of all mankind. Given the number of pages available this attempt was doomed from the start because there was insufficient room to even BEGIN to scratch the surface, but the authors made things worse by:
(a) making use of a number of flashy gimmicks that spread less content over more space than a more conventional layout would have done and
(b) adopting an edgy, ironic, even humorous attitude that is intended to entertain but is more likely to annoy the historically knowledgeable while it is misinforming the historically ignorant.
Thus we get cutesy chapter headings like "Dungeons and Dragons" for the Middle Ages and "You Sank My Battleship" for the first half of the 20th Century; oddly chosen events for the chapter timelines; "Who's Who of the Worst" pages with an odd selection of history's villains (Al Capone? In the same category as Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot? And why isn't Mao Zedong included?); various charts, some worthless (Who really CARES what ailments tobacco was once thought able to cure?); and a bunch of one page "History Lessons" that conclude with varyingly inappropriate smart-ass comments.
Looking at the worst-case scenarios themselves, one begins to see the problem the authors were attempting to solve with this format change. With the exception of a few that were "artificially aged" ("How to survive an asp bite" is simply "How to survive a snake bite" illustrated by a drawing of an ancient Egyptian.), these (from "How to fend off a saber-toothed tiger" to "How to defect from the USSR") are perfectly good but now obsolete scenarios. Stumped by how to make use of them without "cheating", Piven and Borgenicht apparently came up with the "almanac" concept. One can only hope that future editions, like the upcoming
The Worst Case Scenario Almanac: The Great Outdoors (Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbooks) will benefit from smaller topics allowing for more scenarios and less filler.
Frankly, I guess I just expected more from the handbook grownups.
Note: I wouldn't consider it fair to single out every historical error, but a couple are so completely, 180 degrees wrong that one suspects they might have been deliberate, say in service of a political agenda.
First, the timeline on page 164 contains the following item: "1763 July: British forces distribute smallpox-infected blankets to Native Americans." Frankly I question the thinking behind including this in a HISTORY book, especially one with such limited space, but if you are going to do so, honesty requires something like the following:
Now We Know: Any and all such attempts to spread smallpox were completely useless due to the smallpox virus' inability to survive outside of a human host, which is why it alone among the ancient disease scourges of mankind has been completely eliminated. In fact such attempts were arguably counterproductive because (a) exposure to dead smallpox virus material is one way to develop immunity and (b) the sort of people who would deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox would probably have killed quite a lot of them if they had invested their time, effort, and money in a mass murder technique that ACTUALLY WORKED.
History Lesson: Never mind about the blankets; worry about the health of the people handing them out!
Second, the item about the atomic bomb on page 259 contains the following: "When Germany surrendered in May, it became clear that German scientists had made little progress in developing atomic energy, making the United States the sole possessors of the technology. Nonetheless, President Harry Truman authorized the release of two atomic bombs in Japan in August 1945, killing tens of thousands of people and starting the arms race."
Again honesty requires something like the following: "When Japan surrendered in August, it became clear that Japanese scientists had made tremendous progress in developing atomic energy, making the United States NOT the sole possessors of the technology. The Japanese atomic program almost certainly would have succeeded if they hadn't run out of time; in fact some Japanese scientists at the time claimed to have successfully tested an atomic bomb between the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks before fleeing the rapidly advancing Soviets, but since the alleged test site was in what became North Korea, it has never been possible to check out these claims.
History Lesson: Sometimes it is important to get the toothpaste out of the tube FIRST.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No