Amazon.com Review
While ungenerous readers might be tempted to consider former Vice President Dan Quayle's criticisms of the liberal "opinion elite" (which he claims "has tilted the country's culture in a direction that is counter to middle-class values") a case of sour grapes over his status as a recurring butt of jokes in
Doonesbury, you really won't find much bitterness in
Worth Fighting For. Instead, Quayle lays out one of the most explicitly "family values"-themed platforms of the campaign for the U.S. presidential election in 2000. Nearly everything on his docket--from education reform to tax cuts, from pro-life policy to judicial appointments--has been developed in line with the question, "Does it strengthen the American family?" (And, also, "Is this a proper function of the federal government?") Cyberlibertarians will be interested to note that while Quayle echoes the universal lament that something needs to be done about online pornography, he also comes down firmly against surrendering electronic encryption keys to federal law enforcement agencies: "Frankly," he says, "our private lives are none of the government's business." Perhaps that respect for privacy is why, while he's resistant to legalizing same-sex marriages, he says nothing explicitly condemnatory of gays and lesbians, basing his objections to gay rights legislation on the principle that as American citizens homosexuals are already entitled to "equal and fair treatment." Quayle is an acknowledged long shot for the Republican nomination in 2000; though coverage of his campaign in the press is somewhat uneven, the publication of
Worth Fighting For ensures that his agenda can in theory be made accessible to voters.
From Publishers Weekly
In the first salvo of his campaign for the presidency in 2000, Quayle never fails to mention Al Gore, the likely Democratic nominee, in the same sentence as Bill Clinton, whose moral failings Quayle seeks to attach to the entire Democratic Party. And, in writing that "conservatives have always been compassionate," Quayle seeks to rhetorically outflank the early Republican favorite, George W. Bush, who has lately used the term "compassionate conservatism." Clearly, Quayle intends to run way to the right of Bush and to wage political culture war. "Incredible as it may seem," he writes, "we continue to be in the midst of debates begun in the '60s." When preaching family values, Quayle comes off as sincere and committed, but he spends more time attacking those he believes don't share his values than in articulating what his values are. His attacks on the "opinion elite" are boilerplate at best, disingenuous at worst. While he rails against "the septic shock that hit American universities," he's nevertheless happy to turn to academic experts when doing so supports his arguments. He also reveals that he took his manuscript to Random House before turning to Word and, as an example of elite contempt for mainstream America, reprints Ann Godoff's rejection letter in its four-sentence entirety. He's most interesting when pointing to lingering inequalities in wealth and when lamenting how consumerism has eroded Americans' sense of community. His call for an income tax cut appears rooted in concern for a squeezed middle class rather than in a desire to curry favor with the capital gains gang. As an extended stump speech, this is serviceable, though written with no more or less linguistic flair and conceptual reach than the average elected official displays before a battery of microphones. 200,000 first printing; $250,000 ad/promo; simultaneous audio; author tour.
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.