17 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Stonehouse has a serious beef with the Coast Guard., November 17, 2004
This review is from: The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald (Paperback)
Others have called this the "definitive account" of the Edmund Fitzgerald's sinking, and it certainly is comprehensive. Stonehouse takes all the facts as they are known and lays them out for the reader to draw his or her own conclusions. He also (and this is highly commendable) includes the actual texts of the various documents pertaining to the sinking, along with pictures, sketches and diagrams, to give the reader as much of the evidence as possible.
However in the section entitled "A Conspiracy of Ineptitude," Stonehouse goes off onto a tangential rant about the incompetency of the modern Coast Guard and how they are not prepared for lifesaving on the Great Lakes and their equipment is outmoded and their training is inadequate and so on and so forth and boy, aren't the Coast Guard just a bunch of sorry yokels? all of which has very little to do with the Fitz's sinking. Now it may be entirely possible that the Coast Guard is in a dreary state today, and I'm sure that most right-thinking people would agree that the Coast Guard should have the facilities it needs to do its job. Can't argue with that. However, as even Stonehouse admits several times, there was nothing the Coast Guard *could* have done on the night of the Fitz's sinking, even under optimum conditions, because the ship just went down too fast. Therefore, his hatin' on the Coast Guard is seriously irrelevant to the topic of the book, the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald. (This may be why he saved it for an epilogue; but really, no more than a brief mention is necessary, and Stonehouse could have/should have saved this for another book--it might have gotten more attention in that way as well.)
The book is also somewhat confusingly organized; the primary documents are in the *middle* of the book for some reason when they could have been saved for an appendix, and the same could be said for the photo sections. There apparently also seems to have been more sections added for the 1996 rerelease of the book, and these were simply and oddly appended at the back of the book; though they could easily have been worked in with the main text.
The negatives here, however, are mostly minor stylistic stuff; the substance of the book is good, solid, and well-documented (indeed, Stonehouse's inclusion of the primary texts is invaluable). For anyone interested in researching the sinking of the Fitzgerald, this book is a must read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
33 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
IT IS THE BEST BOOK I HAVE EVER READ ON THE BIG FITZ, May 15, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald (Paperback)
I HAVE JUST BOUGHT THIS COPY OF THE BOOK AND I COULD NOT PUT IT DOWN. I HAVE BEEN STUDING THE BIG FITZ NOW FOR ABOUT A YEAR NOW AND THIS BOOK IS THE BEST I HAVE SEEN . THERE ARE PARTS THAT I DID NOT AGREE WITH . BUT OTHER PARTS THAT I DID. THE PICTURES WHERE EXCELLENT AND THE SONG AND THE NAMES OF THE CREW MEMBERS WHERE A NICE TOUCH TOO. OVER ALL I HAVE TO RATE THIS BOOK AS THE BEST BOOK WRITTEN ABOUT THE EDMUND FITZGERALD. ALTHOUGH I PAID 25 DOLLARS FOR IT I WOULD SAY IT WAS THE BEST THING I HAVE EVER BOUGHT ON THE EDMUND FITZGERALD! THANK YOU MICHELLE GREEN
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Doesn't sink into idle speculation, July 24, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald (Paperback)
This is a very good book about the Fitzgerald wreck. However, two things I wish the author had done:
1. Get off his soapbox about the deficiencies in the Coast Guard Rescue services in lake Superior. I think it needed mentioning, but not in the detail he chose. He also ignores the Canadian rescue facilities.
2. Label the photographs instead of making the reader refer to other pages to determine what they are looking at.
Otherwise, the book is excellent and was well worth the money.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No