XL-3000PRO 0.3x 52-67mm Snap-On Semi-Fisheye Ultra Wide Lens

by Raynox

Product Details

• Item Weight: 6.2 ounces
• Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• ASIN: B00009UTK6
• Item model number: RAXL-3000P
• Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Date first available at Amazon.com: October 2, 2001

Product Description

XL-3000PRO lens is equipped with a Lens Hood and universal sized Snap-on mount, and attaches instantly to your Camcorders lens to provide an extra wideangle view. Universal mount is suitable for 52-67mm filter sizes. Compatible with: SONY VX-2000 DSR-PD150/PD100 DSR-250 Canon GL-1 GL-2 Canon XM-1, XM-2. Nominal 0.3X (Actual 0.35X/horizontal, 0.25X/diagonal). (Limited zoom capability) Size/Weight : 135mm x 24mm/ 175gr

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Affordable Fish Eye Lens, May 19, 2011

By 

Scott Canfield (Oregon) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: XL-3000PRO 0.3x 52-67mm Snap-On Semi-Fisheye Ultra Wide Lens (Electronics)

I wanted a fish eye (or near fish eye) lens for my still camera (Fujifilm Finepix S100FS). I looked at several lenses, read reviews, and narrowed my choices to three. I chose this Raynox mostly because of the price, and the fact that it would fit more than one lens thread size because of the way it attaches; kind of like a great big lens cap. It feels like it could get bumped off the camera fairly easily, but there is a place to attach a safety line to it if you would like. I have only used it at a couple events so far. I am happy with the results, and it has not unexpectedly fallen off the camera. I hesitated to buy this lens because it is sold as a lens for a video camera, but it does work fine on a still camera. The first time I used it, the camera would not focus because I did not have it set on Macro focus.

4 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Disappointment with Raynox Product, October 14, 2004

By 

Glynn Clapsaddle "[e-mail]" (San Diego, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: XL-3000PRO 0.3x 52-67mm Snap-On Semi-Fisheye Ultra Wide Lens (Electronics)

This review is not for this product specifically, but more on the quality of Raynox products themselves. I have included below the transcript from a series of e-mails between Raynox and myself. This is unedited, exactly as the exchange went. Needless to say, I am very unhappy with their product and their customer service, and I will never buy another one of their items. I offer my experience only to help others avoid a waste of money. Read my story and make up your own mind. But, at the very least, take careful consideration before buying one of their products. The one positive thing I will say about Raynox is that they DID respond to me in a very timely fashion, their first response was within 45 minutes of my e-mail. I just wish the content of the response would have been as pleasing as it's speed.

Me:

Within the past year, I have purchased two Raynox lenses for my Sony Mini-DV camcorder. I purchased the DVR-3000, for $120.45, and the DVR-5000, for $49.95. To say that I have been disappointed with these

products is an understatement. With the DVR-5000, the wide-angle lens, when I was zoomed-out completely, there was severe vignetting, and when zoomed in, the only clear part of the image was the very center.

Everything else was distorted and fuzzy. I put the DVR-5000 in my closet and purchased a competitor's lens, as I was already out of my 30 days since my purchase. Unfortunately, I did not need the DVR-3000

for several months. This past weekend, I used it at the San Diego Chargers football game to take 73 digital stills. These images looked fine on my LCD screen, but when I got home and downloaded them to my computer, I found the exact same problem that I had had with the other lens. But, this is a telephoto, I'm SUPPOSED to be able to zoom in. The images were all fuzzy and distorted, except for the very center.

These images are absolutely useless to me and have proven that I wasted almost $200 on Raynox product. Now, I have to purchase a competitor's lens, for a lot more money, and I am unable to do that at this

time. Therefore, not only am I out of my original investment, but I am losing business, as I am a professional videographer. I wanted to give Raynox an opportunity to correct this. Please have someone contact me by e- mail or phone.

Raynox:

I do not know what camera model you used but DVR-5000 is a standard quality wide-angle lens and like every conversion there is no " Perfect matching" for some camera models. The DVR-5000 works perfect.

I would suggest HD-5000PRO for present mini-DV camcorders. The DVR-3000 is not designed for digital stills and the quality is up to standard TV screen resolution.

Me:

I am currently using the Sony DCR-PC330. Now, my bigger complaint is with the DVR-3000. What am I supposed to do if my video is also fuzzy? It's not just the digital stills, and it's not a resolution problem. It's that the entire image is fuzzy and also has some color distortion.

Raynox:

Again, there are no "Perfect Matching" for some camera models.

Me:

Ok, I am just trying to understand this. The lens fits physically perfectly to my camera, without an adapter. What do you mean by "perfect matching" and how can I tell if that's the problem?

Raynox:

The DVR-3000 is long discontinued . The camcorder you are using is over 3 megapixels and not recommended to use such a lens .

Me:

Well, I can't say that I am exactly happy with Raynox's answer. You have basically said that the lens is not of a high enough quality to operate with my resolution, and we're only talking 3 megapixel here. I would still have to say that I will never buy another Raynox product. The fact remains that I now have to spend $250 on another lens and basically throw away the $120 Raynox lens I have already purchased.