Stuart Chambers has brought a fresh approach to the story of one of the longest-lasting rock bands in existence Yes. Chambers sees their history as falling into three main phases: classic Yes (1970 1977), modern Yes (1981 1991) and Yes future (1992 2001). He illustrates his thesis by examining three distinct styles of Yes music that surfaced over three decades.
Chambers conveys the dynamics between the band members as they come and go and the politics of music with thoughtful and insightful clarity. Perhaps one of their main assets is the ability to adapt to the times, because, as Chambers says, If rock groups are unwilling to reinvent themselves as years pass, relying solely on their laurels, they lose credibility.
It is quite clear that Yes is still credible, still in the running, and still going strong.
I liked the book. It showed a nice overview of a period of Yes which isn t often talked about very highly. I think Trevor Rabin s involvement brought them to the forefront again (c mon MTV, top ten singles, who d thought we d see this in the 80s). The book also adds to the evolution of the band. Would there still be a Yes if they hadn t proven themselves to be a viable, saleable unit? I liked the insights offered, and it made me want to go back and re-listen to albums, and reassess my thoughts. I would recommend this to any fan of Yes to check out. Dan Hanley, Director of Media Relations, Magna Carta Records
Chambers conveys the dynamics between the band members as they come and go and the politics of music with thoughtful and insightful clarity. Perhaps one of their main assets is the ability to adapt to the times, because, as Chambers says, If rock groups are unwilling to reinvent themselves as years pass, relying solely on their laurels, they lose credibility.
It is quite clear that Yes is still credible, still in the running, and still going strong.
I liked the book. It showed a nice overview of a period of Yes which isn t often talked about very highly. I think Trevor Rabin s involvement brought them to the forefront again (c mon MTV, top ten singles, who d thought we d see this in the 80s). The book also adds to the evolution of the band. Would there still be a Yes if they hadn t proven themselves to be a viable, saleable unit? I liked the insights offered, and it made me want to go back and re-listen to albums, and reassess my thoughts. I would recommend this to any fan of Yes to check out. Dan Hanley, Director of Media Relations, Magna Carta Records
