Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America's Health Care System (Paperback)

by David M. Cutler (Author) "BEFORE WE CONSIDER THE HEALTH care system, we need to agree on what we mean by health..." (more)
Key Phrases: overused care, heart attack care, universal insurance coverage, United States, Pricing the Priceless, Social Security (more...)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
Not to be confused with the bestselling personal finance volume (by Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin), this work examines the health care crisis in America. Many people readily admit they're unhappy with both the cost and the care they receive from their doctors and are very frustrated with the health-care system. However, according to Cutler, an economics professor at Harvard and health-care adviser in the Clinton administration, the advances made in health care over the past 50 years have been quite positive and have contributed to longer and more productive lives. But people have a hard time understanding their choices-paying more for medicine that will keep them alive or choosing costly surgery that may not guarantee a better quality of life. Cutler offers numerous examples of medical progress along with economic reasoning to persuade readers that more and more medical advances should be sought, along with better medical coverage for everyone. "For medical care to be effective, people must be able to afford it. The issue of affordability is clearly a concern of the uninsured. The uninsured rely on the largesse of the medical system as a whole." Cutler's discussion of managed care and how doctors are reimbursed for certain procedures but discouraged from other practices is especially clear. Cutler's position-health insurance for all and doctor reimbursement by quality, not simply service-is clear and compelling. This book will be of most interest to government officials, doctors and others in the health-care industry.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From The New England Journal of Medicine
The rising cost of health care -- and what to do about this problem -- is perhaps our nation's most pressing health policy issue. The recent spike in private-insurance premiums has alarmed both employers and employees. More telling is the lack of clear policy options designed to discourage the introduction and use of high-cost, low-benefit medical care. As if the problem were not bad enough, other research findings tell us that evidence-based medical care is dramatically underused. David Cutler makes an important contribution to our thinking on this important issue in Your Money or Your Life. The book provides a nice forum for Cutler to present much of his research that has framed how we should think about rising health care costs and whether the additional spending is worth it. Most of the popular discussion concerning rising health care spending neglects the obvious questions -- what we are buying with the additional spending and whether we are producing commensurate increases in health benefits. Cutler's conclusion is a clear "yes": the incremental health care benefits that patients receive exceed their costs. However, he provides the important caveat that we could produce the same level of health care benefits at even lower costs. The book is a good introduction to the policy debate over health care spending. It starts by appropriately framing the issue that we cannot look at the rise in spending without first measuring and comparing the benefits purchased. Chapters 3 through 5 methodically track the growth in spending to treat low-birth-weight infants, patients with depression, and those who have had heart attacks. These initial chapters contain compelling information and should be read by all who are interested in health care policy. Underlying the growth in spending is the persistent march of science. The introduction of new forms of technology allows us to treat more patients with particular medical conditions, though generally at a high price per case. The heart of the book examines these trends and, in the three case studies that it follows, compares the added spending to the change in health benefits. In each case, total spending per case has risen, driven largely by the introduction of new medical technology. In some cases, the medical returns have been impressive. In the treatment of low-birth-weight newborns, medical advances (e.g., incubator design, new drugs), although expensive, have produced a dramatic reduction in mortality rates. As discussed in chapter 3, each additional $1 spent on treating low-birth-weight babies has produced $5 of additional health benefits -- an expensive, though worthwhile, investment. Chapters 4 and 5 present the same evidence for treatment, respectively, of depression (a seven-to-one return on investment) and heart attacks (a four-to-one return on each dollar spent). Chapter 6 attempts a broader extrapolation of the medical value of health care spending -- a somewhat tougher sell. Some of the later chapters, such as chapter 8, which examines what went wrong with managed care, seem to wander slightly off target. If the health care we are purchasing is worth it, why the general malaise? Some of it is clearly traced to the perceptions of purchasers and consumers that we spend too much, that we could buy the same benefits for far less money, and that the system is hopelessly complicated. Along these lines, chapters 9 and 10 attempt to address the issue of providing better care more efficiently. One suggestion is to give physicians bonus payments for providing high-quality, evidence-based medical care. Though controversial, the idea is a good one that should be debated seriously. The final chapter wanders into the hornet's nest of universal health insurance coverage. Cutler proposes an expansion of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to those who want to join. This chapter is too short for such a complex topic, and it meanders slightly from the compelling story and analyses presented in the first five chapters. Who should read this book? Health policymakers and people who are troubled with the rise in health care spending and are perplexed about what to do about it. Your Money or Your Life makes an important contribution to this debate, and I highly recommend it. Kenneth E. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 176 pages
• Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA; 1 edition (February 10, 2005)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0195181328
• ISBN-13: 978-0195181326
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.1 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 10.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #314,023 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #63 in	Books > Professional & Technical > Law > Family & Health Law > Medical Law & Legislation
  #72 in	Books > Nonfiction > Law > Family & Health Law > Medical Law & Legislation

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars useful book on current healthcare economics, August 24, 2004

By	Academic Operative Wannabe - See all my reviews

This review is from: Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America's Health Care System (Hardcover)

This book is probably an important addition to the literature on healthcare economics. It offers a good corrective to the politics out there. It reminds us that healthcare spending is not wasted spending, in the sense that it almost always adds value. It also points out that in many ways the costs of healthcare are FALLING.

The real question is how can we continue to improve the value of our healthcare dollar? Cutler concurs with many conservative healthcare analysts that the real problem is that the incentives in the American healthcare system are wrong. The incentives are aligned in favor of healthcare interventions rather than health. He proposes to address this incentive problem by having the government intervene in the market by providing the right incentives. In essence, the government would post-hoc realign the incentives by rewarding quality after-the-fact and beyond fees for services. In addition, he would subsidize insurance to create universal coverage.

This is an interesting idea. At the very least, it makes the important observations that the current system is rife with market failures due to the government-imposed structure of the market.

He does not seriously investigate other options. Both single-payer and conservative proposals are rejected with a single paragraph each. This probably misses some significant arguments from each. My sense is that he only sees one kind of market failure when there are at least two. The first problem has to do with incentives, which he sees.

The second problem has to do with information that is not efficiently used. Many of the conservative thinkers on this have argued that IT ought to provide significant cost-savings. In essence, 13% of our economy is still operating without the information processing that has revolutionalized the information economy.

12 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars compelling approach to fix the broken American health system, January 28, 2004

By	Harriet Klausner - See all my reviews (#1 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America's Health Care System (Hardcover)

Forty million Americans lack health care insurance and costs leap three and four times the inflation rate yet few Americans feel the system provides adequate care. Harvard economics professor and health-care expert Dr. David M. Cutler believes that the problem lies with the inability for most people to understand opportunity costs based on choices that may not lead to an improved life quality. The government and medical leadership exacerbate the problem with saving money as their solution, ignoring effectiveness. He makes a strong case on how much health care has dramatically improved over the past five decades as dramatized by longer productive life spans. Dr. Cutler believes that more money should be spent on further medical advances and that universal coverage for all needs should be implemented so that the present day uninsured can afford care rather than drain at a more costly rate the system. The key is to change from a system that economically encourages doctors to choose techniques that are not always the best for the patient factoring in cost and life quality to a system that reimburses doctors for quality service (not as hard as it first sounds).

Though at times the medical supply and demand is difficult to grasp, YOUR MONEY OR YOUR LIFE makes a powerful well written argument to reengineer a system in which political band aids fail everyone. The case for quality and the explanation of choices are well done and surprisingly easy to follow while offering a seemingly radical but compellingly logical approach to fixing the broken American health system.

Harriet Klausner

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Four and a Half Stars..., January 19, 2008

By	C.N. Steele - See all my reviews

since nothing is perfect.

Authoritative, clearly written, and quite interesting; I recommend to anyone -- professionals, academics, laypersons -- interested in these issues.

Specifics:
1) The first 5 chapters convincingly argue that the enormous increases in health care spending are first attributable to new technology and treatments, and well justified, benefits substantially exceed the costs. The arguments are based in substantial part on Cutler's own academic research. By themselves, these chapters are sufficient to justify the book. Cutler does a good job of explaining both the technical economic concepts and the medical issues, and I suspect anyone interested in the topic will find the chapters fascinating, eye-opening.

He reaches a very important conclusion: we ought to spend MORE, not less.

2) Subsequent chapters survey sources of waste and problems of distribution. I found these helpful in outlining some important problems, and well worth reading, but incomplete (see below). In part these explore the incentives created by different systems of paying for health care; this helps explain why some sorts of technologies and procedures are favored over others in any particular case.

3) The concluding chapter contains his solution to the problems, a system of universal insurance (mostly private) coverage, subsidized and supervised by the federal gov't; worth reading, but inadequate. Cutler focuses on a subset of problems & proposes a solution, with little consideration for other problems or possible solutions.

For example, he ignores 'public choice' issues: how would his proposal work in a world of self-interested government official, bureaucrats, insurers, medical professionals, patients, etc.? The system he proposes might work on paper, but is quite susceptible to "gaming." USDA crop insurance is a real world example, and its poor performance should make us hesitant to expand this approach to health care.

Similarly, Cutler argues that gov't and insurers should develop a payment system that rewards providers for measurable health improvements. Cutler greatly underestimates the difficulty. Soviet planners wrestled this problem for 75 years and were unable to solve it, how to specify a set of desired production outcomes from above and then have them realized as one envisions. It's a very difficult problem, I think unsolvable. Cutler underestimates it, and devotes essentially no attention to possible solutions which would make the individual consumer directly responsible for payment, and evaluation, of health care services.

4) Cutler provides a lengthy set of citations from the scholarly literature, excellent for further study. He also features, on his website, a technical appendix. It's clear he's trying to spread light, not heat, in the health care debate. Good on him!

5) Despite any weaknesses, Cutler does a fine job of framing the issues. The book is accessible and a good read. OK, OK, 4.9 stars.

C.N. Steele Ph.D.