If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?
 
 
Start reading If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? [Hardcover]

G. A. Cohen (Author)
3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $14.58  
Hardcover --  
Paperback $25.13  

Book Description

0674002180 978-0674002180 June 3, 2000
This book presents G. A. Cohen's Gifford Lectures, delivered at the University of Edinburgh in 1996. Focusing on Marxism and Rawlsian liberalism, Cohen draws a connection between these thought systems and the choices that shape a person's life. In the case of Marxism, the relevant life is his own: a communist upbringing in the 1940s in Montreal, which induced a belief in a strongly socialist egalitarian doctrine. The narrative of Cohen's reckoning with that inheritance develops through a series of sophisticated engagements with the central questions of social and political philosophy.

In the case of Rawlsian doctrine, Cohen looks to people's lives in general. He argues that egalitarian justice is not only, as Rawlsian liberalism teaches, a matter of rules that define the structure of society, but also a matter of personal attitude and choice. Personal attitude and choice are, moreover, the stuff of which social structure itself is made. Those truths have not informed political philosophy as much as they should, and Cohen's focus on them brings political philosophy closer to moral philosophy, and to the Judeo-Christian ethical tradition, than it has recently been. (20010112)



Editorial Reviews

Review

These nine engaging and searching lectures, an unorthodox mixture of intellectual autobiography and philosophical argument, fall into two parts. In the first, [Cohen] describes the leading features of the Marxism in which he once believed. In the second, he explains why he remains critical of the sort of left-wing liberalism that would seem to be Marxism's natural alternative. (Ben Rogers The Observer )

Some titles carry the author's voice...Surely If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? does. Cohen is much the funniest living Anglophone political philosopher of any note, as well as perhaps the cleverest. Many of his best comic effects depend on the tone of voice, and some are clearly intended simply for fun. But it is always dangerous to assume that the jokes do not carry a point...[Cohen's book is] a strikingly personal address, fusing autobiography and the history of ideas with political philosophy, and ending not only with the weighty issue of how far personal attitudes must feature within the subject matter of justice itself, but with the more disconcerting question of how far the disciplines of living effectively under capitalism are bound to prove lethal for the soul...At one level, Cohen's book is largely an ingenious and agreeably frank casuistry of the ethics of professorial income management, but at another and more consequential level, it is a most imaginative deployment of personal ethical discomfort to pin down, and press home, a deep evasion at the center of this majority vision of social justice under capitalism. Its source may be merely the externalization of a private disquiet; but its force at the point of impact is as public as any philosopher could wish. (John Dunn Times Higher Education Supplement )

This is an unusual book, a remarkably successful blend of autobiography, intellectual history and moral philosophy that reflects the author's distinctive outlook and background … [It] presents, I believe, the most important contemporary challenge to the egalitarian form of liberalism...The questions he asks are the ones we should all be worrying about. (Thomas Nagel Times Literary Supplement )

It would be difficult to over-praise this wonderful book. It is profound, humane, witty, erudite, and often deeply personal. Though presented as something of an intellectual memoir, Cohen provides us with more food for thought than has been available in any book on egalitarian political philosophy in recent memory. (Daniel Weinstock Philosophy in Review )

About the Author

G. A. Cohen was Chichele Professor of Social and Political Theory and Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford University.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press (June 3, 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674002180
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674002180
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.4 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,274,929 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.5 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Cohen, God, Marxism and Liberal Theory, July 13, 2003
By 
In this book Cohen examines the role of individual behavior in the philosophy of justice. Cohen starts by telling about his own life as a jewish marxist in Montreal, who later became an analytic philosopher in Oxford. He discusses the core beliefs of marxism with a special emphasis on Marx's views on religion. He argues that marxists have neglected issues of justice and issues of individual behavior. The first was neglected because of wrong views on the working class and the illusion that there would be no real tradeoffs under communism. The second was neglected because of Marx's theory of revolutionary change and history. He finds the missing egaliarian ethos of individual behavior in christianity. Hence the importance of the relationship between marxism and religion.

Cohens next step is to show that Rawls difference principle, which he accepts, must hold for individuals too in a just society. He gives very careful rebuttals of views to the contrary. From this he shows that much less inequality is justified by the difference principle than usually believed.

Now that he handled the case of individual behavior in a just society from a Rawlsian point of view, he adresses the question of how one ought to act in an unjust society. Specifically how should egalitarians act in an unegalitarian society? This leads to the question posed in the title and Cohen spends the rest of the book examining different justifications for why rich people don't have to spend most of their income on ending inequality.

The book will be of interest mainly to marxists and people interested in contemporary political philosophy.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Book largely Marxist rehash - but provoking last chapter, January 23, 2006
By 
Sirin (London, UK) - See all my reviews
G.A. Cohen is a reconstructed Marxist - which means he spend much of his time musing over why a socialist utopia hasn't materialised automatically by the dialectical historical process that Marx predicted. Once he has got through several lectures painstakingly working out precisely why this hasn't happened, his material gets more intersting. He offers a powerful critique of the liberalism offered by John Rawls - based on the difference principle which argues that inequalities are justified so long as they benefit the worst off in society. Cohen challenges this view asking why those who are exceptionally well paid for work that is not especially difficult need to earn so much more than their contemporaries, even if their contemporaries don't suffer as a result.

Most interesting of all is the eponymous final chapter which asks whether it is possible for rich people to be egalitarians in their political thought. This investigates the arena of personal obligation in political theory - a largely unexplored area largely untouched by established political writings which tend to focus on theory at the state level. With so many professed egalitarian politicians sending their children to expensive schools, or living in large houses, or engaging in pocket lining business deals, Cohen is right to explore such issues. I hope that the material at the end of this book launches a more extensive debate on the theme, which seems to me to be a significant aspect of contemporary society.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


31 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Ultimate Challenge to Liberals, Progressives, and Lefts, July 20, 2000
This review is from: If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (Hardcover)
Quite probably one of the best books in political philosophy to emerge in recent decades far outsurpassing Rawls and Nozick's often cited works. In fact these two scholars from Harvard (I believe they are still there), if any, should read this work and then check their bank accounts. Cohen heads straight for the issue confronting contemporary self style liberals or "republicans" in democrat clothing who still speak of economic equality and quasi communitarianism (distributive justice) in today's global economic society so rich with its many "divides" between rich and poor.

The central question comes down to how much people are willing to put their actions and practices where their mouths are, the old cliche of putting one's money where one's mouth is. Cohen elegantly draws the fateful and radical incoherence in the left's incommensurable principles of 1. a just & fair compassionate society and 2. selfish individuals acting in their own interests. Liberals support both by necessity. How do we square these two? How can we demand that society be just economically, that our institutions act altruistically, but on the other hand hold that individuals should be able to act in their own self interest? This is the real dilemma presented by Cohen and I aver that it will take some real time and hard thought to properly answer him on this score. Try turning Ayn Rand into a progressive and you will experience the problem that Cohen presents elegantly in his book. The next book must deal with the implications of all this: do we keep talking like Al Gore but living like the Bushes, or do we give up self interest and create the just society. Liberals want it both ways, Cohen shows they can't have it!

forgive any typos. dms

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews


Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Discussion Replies Latest Post
The left is always trying to accuse the right of racism, but how many of them voted for Obama based on nothing but the color of his skin? 16 25 seconds ago
Amazon Poll: Rank the Presidential Candidates 29 1 minute ago
Music to hear while praising Obama 52 3 minutes ago
Does Obama suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) 60 7 minutes ago
Amazon Poll: Republicans only ~ Rank the Presidential Candidates 18 10 minutes ago
The Newt has offered us the moon! if we vote for him... 65 10 minutes ago
I just received a "very good" textbook without its disc - what are your thoughts? 168 21 hours ago
Never buy school textbooks. Download them to your reading device or computer 3 3 days ago
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject