Product Description
The long theoretical dispute between Einstein and quantum physicists, both in the ethical and theoretical realm, has become today more relevant than ever, due to the experiments taken place at CERN:
- On one side, it seems increasingly evident that the Higgs particle does not exist, since 90% of its possible energy ranges has been explored leaving only a 10% of chances to the 'God's particle' . And so an explanation of mass, coming from quantum models seems increasingly disproved. This obliges us to look for alternative models to explain mass, based in the work of Einstein on gravitation.
The book provides that alternative model, evolved from Einstein's principle of equivalence between acceleration, gravitation and... mass.
On that view mass is an intrinsic property of particles, not a solid substance, but an accelerated motion, a vortex of gravitational space-time, which attracts as a hurricane does, the faster it moves. Hence there is a direct relationship between the frequency of the mass vortex and its attractive power, deduced from 2 fundamental equations of physics, E=Mc2 and E=hv; hence M=kv.
The book develops this theory of mass as a vortex of gravitational information, a clock of time that stores most of the information of the Universe... since 'time bends space into mass' (Einstein); and deduces from it a Unification Equation of masses and charges (Einstein's last failed theoretical work), solving many other questions of modern physics... including the non-existence of the Higgs, the non-evaporation of black holes and the paradox of information (since black holes in fact create mass, the mains storage of form, of in/form/ation in the Universe).
- Those conclusions bring about the second theme of the book, the ethical responsibility of nuclear physicists, which too easily ignore the dangers of exploring ranges of energy beyond those this planet can stand. Since if the Higgs does not exist, and the extension of the Principle of Equivalence to the concept of mass is the real explanation of mass, then black holes do not evaporate, as they do not obey quantum principles. Then CERN's experiments which have a small chance of creating a black hole on Earth, when the LHC goes to maximal potency in 2013, could destroy the planet. Or in statistical terms, a 1-10% chance of creating black holes would mean a 1-10% x 7 billion legal genocide, the highest crime committed on planet Earth...
Should we follow those experiments, if as it seems increasingly confirmed Higgs and Hawking are wrong in their attempts to explain mass and black holes with quantum effects and Einstein is right.
Probably Mr. Einstein, if he could cast an opinion on those experiments, would oppose them, as he vehemently opposed the Nuclear Race during the cold war, in which most of the community of quantum physicists was working...
Intellectual achievements and ethical standings are not mutually exclusive, and a long, open debate on the theoretical and ethical issues poised about by CERN's experiments is long overdue.
Luis Sancho is a General Systems Theorist, known by his models of the Universe based in the use of two arrows of time, energy and information. He has been chair of duality, the science of the two arrows of time, for many years at the International Systems Science Society.
He has been also involved in a series of suits against CERN seeking a review of its present safety standards that rely in a series of scientific theories (Higgs, Black hole evaporation) which are not proved and if false, would mean that those experiments poise a real risk for the future of this planet.
There is a hardcover edition at: http://bookstore.xlibris.com/Products/SKU-0037970049/The-Black-Hole-Factory.aspx
- On one side, it seems increasingly evident that the Higgs particle does not exist, since 90% of its possible energy ranges has been explored leaving only a 10% of chances to the 'God's particle' . And so an explanation of mass, coming from quantum models seems increasingly disproved. This obliges us to look for alternative models to explain mass, based in the work of Einstein on gravitation.
The book provides that alternative model, evolved from Einstein's principle of equivalence between acceleration, gravitation and... mass.
On that view mass is an intrinsic property of particles, not a solid substance, but an accelerated motion, a vortex of gravitational space-time, which attracts as a hurricane does, the faster it moves. Hence there is a direct relationship between the frequency of the mass vortex and its attractive power, deduced from 2 fundamental equations of physics, E=Mc2 and E=hv; hence M=kv.
The book develops this theory of mass as a vortex of gravitational information, a clock of time that stores most of the information of the Universe... since 'time bends space into mass' (Einstein); and deduces from it a Unification Equation of masses and charges (Einstein's last failed theoretical work), solving many other questions of modern physics... including the non-existence of the Higgs, the non-evaporation of black holes and the paradox of information (since black holes in fact create mass, the mains storage of form, of in/form/ation in the Universe).
- Those conclusions bring about the second theme of the book, the ethical responsibility of nuclear physicists, which too easily ignore the dangers of exploring ranges of energy beyond those this planet can stand. Since if the Higgs does not exist, and the extension of the Principle of Equivalence to the concept of mass is the real explanation of mass, then black holes do not evaporate, as they do not obey quantum principles. Then CERN's experiments which have a small chance of creating a black hole on Earth, when the LHC goes to maximal potency in 2013, could destroy the planet. Or in statistical terms, a 1-10% chance of creating black holes would mean a 1-10% x 7 billion legal genocide, the highest crime committed on planet Earth...
Should we follow those experiments, if as it seems increasingly confirmed Higgs and Hawking are wrong in their attempts to explain mass and black holes with quantum effects and Einstein is right.
Probably Mr. Einstein, if he could cast an opinion on those experiments, would oppose them, as he vehemently opposed the Nuclear Race during the cold war, in which most of the community of quantum physicists was working...
Intellectual achievements and ethical standings are not mutually exclusive, and a long, open debate on the theoretical and ethical issues poised about by CERN's experiments is long overdue.
Luis Sancho is a General Systems Theorist, known by his models of the Universe based in the use of two arrows of time, energy and information. He has been chair of duality, the science of the two arrows of time, for many years at the International Systems Science Society.
He has been also involved in a series of suits against CERN seeking a review of its present safety standards that rely in a series of scientific theories (Higgs, Black hole evaporation) which are not proved and if false, would mean that those experiments poise a real risk for the future of this planet.
There is a hardcover edition at: http://bookstore.xlibris.com/Products/SKU-0037970049/The-Black-Hole-Factory.aspx
