Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Endless Lust?, June 5, 2003
I read several years ago ENDLESS LOVE, a novel I liked immensely and was therefore eager to start this one. The novel is certainly an easy read. You can race right through it. It's all about Daniel Emerson's obsession with Iris Davenport and his pursuit of her come hell or high water as he rides out his passion in a fragile "paper boat," if you want to mix your metaphors. The characters for the most part are well developed although I thought Iris's husband may have been almost a stereotype. Spencer tackles head-on the dicey subject of an affair between a black woman and white man, certainly an area not every writer is willing to explore. Having finished the novel, I was troubled by the character Daniel, however. Although his lover Kate continuously describes him as a good man, I'm not at all sure he is. I believe the moral question is this: does anyone have a right to insist on getting whatever he thinks he wants, no matter who gets hurt or destroyed along the way, in order that he can have an all consuming affair? There are of course similarities in Daniel and the young man in ENDLESS LOVE who, as I recall, in a fit of passionate love, burns down the home the young girl he's crazy about lives in. We may be able to forgive youth their folly. I'm not sure we can overlook as easily the sins of people entering middle age. Having said that, if you accept the premise that everyone here gets hurt or destroyed, you'll find this compelling reading.
|
|
|
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I hated this book, November 1, 2004
I'm a big fan of two previous Scott Spencer novels ("Endless Love" and "Waking the Dead"). But after reading a "A Ship Made of Paper," I wondered whether Spencer might be one of those writers who had a finite number of stories in him -- and we've already heard them all.
With his desire to speak out against racism in America, Spencer's heart is certainly in the right place, and it's too bad that more writers aren't of a like mind in that sense. Unfortunately, this novel functions more as an advertisement for adultery than it does for colorblindness. Neither Daniel nor Iris is trapped in a relationship that couldn't be gotten out of without, in Iris's case, a lawyer, or in Daniel's, a U-Haul. Yet instead of showing a bit of backbone, both Daniel and Iris, separately, before the central action of the book begins, decide to go looking for love behind their partners' backs. Only then do they develop a flirtation, start an affair, and Fall in Love. Then they have the gall to do things like, in Daniel's case, lie to his girlfriend Kate, carry on under her nose while living in her house as her suspicion rises, and research the practicalities of making a life with Iris while Kate sits at his side (I'm thinking of the scene where he queries a mixed couple about the practicalities of having an interracial marriage, while he's on what's supposed to be a romantic outing with Kate).
In an apparent effort to remove some of the sting of Daniel's actions, Spencer makes Kate an unappealing character herself -- she's racist, for one thing -- but do her flaws make it OK for Daniel to treat her in this manner? It seems to me that the answer is no; a good person would treat Kate with at least a minimal level of respect, regardless of her catalog of flaws. But Daniel is not of this mind. And it seems that Spencer, by making it easy to dislike Kate, is trying to take the easy way out, in a sense.
As for Daniel, Spencer has chosen to imbue his character with many of the traits he gave David Axelrod, the first-person narrator of "Endless Love." Yet while those characteristics (obsessiveness, among others) made sense in the older novel -- where the character in question was a teenager heartsick over the loss of his first love, and perhaps a bit crazy as well -- in Daniel, a middle-aged lawyer, these traits are charmless. They make Daniel seem like, well, an adolescent, when in fact he ought to be a grownup.
I won't get into the many implausible plot twists -- like the police officer who sends a volunteer search party out into treacherous terrain without flashlights, for instance, or Daniel's decision, while on his way to care for an invalid who despises him, to bring along two 5-year-olds, one of whom likes to beat the other up, even though the kids are supposed to be in day care anyway. Suffice to say there are plenty of unlikely scenes, and, yes, they're annoying.
Most offensive, though, is the author's suggestion that dishonesty is OK, as long as one has a worthy goal, like love, and especially if your love is interracial. A close second in the offensive category is the treatment of alcoholism, which, the text suggests, is a character flaw on a par with racism.
|
|
|
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A beautiful read, September 29, 2006
This is my first Scott Spencer book, and I will definitely seek out his previous works. I loved this book, and could identify with many of the characters. Mr. Spencer writes beautifully, his decriptions of people, places and situations are unconventional and startling. The book's main theme is obsession, and how it can destroy the lives of many. It doens't have the happiest of endings, but it was extremely well-written and enjoyable.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|