Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C [Paperback]

Dr. Steve Hickey & Dr. Hilary Roberts (Author)

Editorial Reviews

Review

Dare I say, the most important development in the history of vitamin C? -- John Ely, University of Washington, June 22, 2004

The theory proposed, the Dynamic Flow Model, is the most important development in the history of vitamin C. -- The Vitamin C Foundation, June 27, 2004

Vitamin C could cut the health service budget in half. ...well written, insightful and at the forefront of scientific literature. -- Mike Mesham, June 10, 2004. lulu.com/content/53926

Well done, a truly fantastic book... -- Dr Selva Kumar M.D., Lulu Review, June 8, 2004

Well done, a truly fantastic book... I pay tribute to Prof Linus Pauling (on) the 10th anniversary of his death. -- Selva Kumar M.D. June 8, 2004. lulu.com/content/55277

Product Description

This book examines the idea that vitamin C can be used to prevent and treat some of the most serious illnesses of the modern world. Its shocking conclusion is that there is ample preliminary support for the suggestion, but the medical and pharmaceutical industries have failed to replicate the early work. The consequence of this failure could be huge, both in terms of financial costs to health services, as well as widespread suffering and premature death.

The relationship between vitamin C and health has been controversial for decades. Influential scientists, including double Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, have argued that ascorbate could prevent or cure heart disease, stroke, cancer and infections. Conventional experts disagreed, disparaging supplements in favour of fruits and vegetables. This book examines the evidence and shows that the establishment mistrust of vitamin C supplementation is unfounded. The frequently quoted advice, that supplements are redundant if the person consumes five daily portions of fruit and vegetables, is scientifically weak.

The book explores the facts behind the controversy in detail. It describes the history of vitamin C, starting with James Lind’s classic 1747 experiment on scurvy. This simple experiment, in which Lind showed that citrus fruit could cure scurvy, was a turning point in the application of science to medicine. It is used here to illustrate and explain the scientific method, which is based on formulating a hypothesis or testable idea, attempting to refute it, and showing that the results can be repeated reliably. The modern medical establishment, with its emphasis on expensive, large-scale trials, has unfortunately come to value pathological science more highly than solid, replicable experiments. Large-scale trials have their uses in searching for rare or weak effects, but if we are looking for a powerful new treatment, then repeated small-scale experiments will find it more quickly. Using only a few scurvy sailors, Lind showed that something in citrus fruit cured them sufficient! ly to be able to work. Anyone who did not believe the results could simply repeat the experiment.

For over half a century, research into vitamin C has been hindered by failure to understand how the vitamin is used by the body. For this reason, a lot of money and effort has been poured into carrying out experiments that were almost guaranteed to fail, because they used doses that were too infrequent and too small. This book re-evaluates the evidence and presents a new model for the action of ascorbate: the dynamic flow model. This extends the ideas of Klenner, Cathcart, Pauling, Stone and other pioneering scientists. The model explains the experiments that have shown beneficial effects of vitamin C, as well as those that have failed to show such effects. In the light of the new model, the long-standing controversy is resolved. At first sight, claims that vitamin C might prevent or cure heart disease, stroke, cancer and infections such as polio, AIDS and SARS, appear unbelievable. However, the claimed benefits have a scientific basis and demand to be considered seriously. This innocuous vitamin could well offer effective treatments that are far cheaper than current methods: something our overloaded health services desperately need. The book concludes with a list of hypotheses that urgently need testing, to restore scientific respectability to the evaluation of ascorbate. If even a few of these suggestions are confirmed, readers will understand why Linus Pauling was prepared to stake his outstanding scientific reputation on vitamin C.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 264 pages
• Publisher: LULU (May 20, 2004)
• ISBN-10: 1411607244
• ISBN-13: 978-1411607248
• Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 6 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 15.5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
• Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #271,732 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

  #57 in

  Books > Health, Mind & Body > Nutrition > Vitamins & Supplements

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

69 of 69 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An Honest Bombshell, August 16, 2004

By	Joel M. Kauffman (Berwyn, PA United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C (Paperback)

Utterly honest, easy to understand, "Ascorbate, The Science of Vitamin C" is a real treasure. The difference between a small anti-scurvy intake of vitamin C, a few milligrams per day, and a therapeutic dose of 10 grams or more per day is made crystal clear.
The complete lack of evidence for the RDA set by the FDA is revealed. The rapid elimination of vitamin C was shown graphically, thus the folly in the persistent use of multi-gram oral doses by inept researchers was exposed. Small doses must be taken orally, maybe every hour, to keep serum levels up. The increase in serum levels obtainable with injected, not oral, sodium ascorbate, the usual non-acidic salt of vitamin C, also called ascorbic acid, is explained well.
The flaws in the published studies intended to debunk the usefulness of vitamin C from The Mayo Clinic and The Heart Protection Study in the UK are spelled out in detail. Wrong doses, wrong dosage forms, mismatched control patients, etc., all combined to fail to prove that vitamin C is not effective in treating cancer or cardiovascular disease. The problems with these studies and others is explained in great detail, and you will be able to follow the reasoning of the authors.
Then it is less of a shock to learn that vitamin C can cure polio and prolong lifespan for those with AIDS and cancer, among other conditions. The studies by Pauling and Cameron on vitamin C for cancer believed invalid by mainstream medicine, were, in fact, as well done as was ethically practical, and were confirmed by unrelated researchers.
My only gripes with this book are the incompetent chemistry on page 63 and some of the explanations of ordinary chemical reactions. Neither hydroxyl radical nor hydroxide ion plus an electron will give water as shown. Neither charges nor atoms are balanced or accounted for. Many disease states were said to be caused by the presence too many free radicals without enough direct evidence or identification of which free radicals.
That done, my opinion is that this book should be required reading by a very wide audience. Referencing is done to a very high standard. The next edition should be superb.

47 of 48 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The latest authoratative story on vitamin C, March 23, 2005

By	W.G. Whitney (Fort McMurray, Alberta, CANADA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C (Paperback)

What a well written, courageous book this is. Courageous because the authors, two professors of medicine, explain in laymen's terms, exactly how science is incorporated into medical practice, and how mistakes and bias get filtered into the mix. After making this clear, they follow the vitamin C story from the very beginning and demonstrate exactly how medical science developed a "bizarre" and illogical pet hate for vitamin C, Pauling and all his disciples. (and ignored apparent benefits)

This will not endear them at all to the tightly knit medical profession, but is a distinct service to the public.

In an honest and fair approach, with no unscientific exaggeration of evidence, the authors explain both sides of the vitamin c "controversy" which wouldn't have been very controversial at all if larger doses had been tried.

They also explode the sacredness of the "large, randomized,double blind, clinical trial" and clearly show how silly it is to deny patients a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) treatment, shown to provide huge benefits, on the flimsy excuse that no large scale trial was performed. Clinical trials should be refuted or replicated to allow science to advance. Phony excuses do not advance science.

All the latest findings are here from Cathcart, Cameron, Riordan, Hoffer and other doctors on the leading edge of ascorbate therapy.

The vitamin C deficiency theory of heart disease, developed by Pauling and Rath, is analyzed and updated, and the latest cancer treatment methods are given.

This is a very important book that has the potential to save hundreds of thousands of lives, it should be placed in the libraries of every school in the country.

W.G. Whitney

37 of 37 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Great resource and great science, July 25, 2004

By	Francis van Ness (San Rafael, CA USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C (Paperback)

A great resource for both medical professionals and lay persons alike. The authors have researched this subject extensively and write about it in a way that is insightful for both the lay person and the professional. They hold the evidence of existing research to the light, and propose an elegant theory which can explain all the existing evidence.
It is refreshing to find the tone of the book quite neutral and scientific.
Although the authors don't subscribe to a conspiracy theory, the evidence that political and economical factors are heavily influencing the medical establishment seems obvious. The medical establishment has shown no interest in duplicating the existing research which points to great benefits in the use of high dosage vitamin C in diseases like cancer, polio and heart disease. Research dating back more than half a century found amazing results for using vitamin C, and yet the medical establishment chooses not to act on it, or worse, design experiments that seem to prove the opposite.