Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Stunning Performance, May 5, 2006
I, like many, have been listening to recordings of these concertos for a lifetime (40+ years). There are several that I love: the Van Cliburn (my first exposure to the 2nd), Richter, Janis, Argerich, and, most recently, Hough, have all had something significant to say about these works. Every once in awhile, though, someone breaks through the veneer and makes us reexamine what we think we know about the warhorses. Such is the achievment of Zimerman in this performance. I had a similar feeling about his Liszt sonata when it was released. The overall shaping of the movements and the range of jaw-dropping viruosity and tenderness will leave you speachless.
As we've seen from the reviews that preceed this one, there are some who feel that the piano is too much in the foreground, and to this is say, "thank god!" Ozawa or Zimerman or the engineers--or perhaps all three--understood that they needed to get out of Zimerman's way. This approach certainly doesn't work for other pianists, nor does it always work for the listener, but it does sometimes work for titans like Argerich, Richter and Zimerman. Look elsewhere for more balance between orchestra and piano. For sheer heart and hair-raising brilliance, though, you will not find a better recording. In fact, in my classical collection that includes thousands of recordings, I have put this on my top-ten list of greatest all-time performances by a pianist. Incidentally, Zimerman's recording of the Liszt sonata also makes the cut.
|
|
|
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Limitless, February 15, 2006
Under Zimerman's hands, the piano seems to have limitless possibilities. His playing can jump from bird-song whispering to a violent storm in the same breath. Truly breathtaking.
Many readers complain about the recessed orchestra sound in the 2nd concerto and I agree. But Ozawa's interpretation leans toward being sensitve and fragile. If you want the orchestra as an equal, powerful partner, try Previn (for Ashkenazy) or Reiner (for Cliburn).
BTW, Zimerman is coming to my town and I am going to hear him!
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
Zimermans best recording?, June 19, 2009
Zimerman is obviously one of the greatest musical artists of this time, but he is also one of the most openly modern and intellectual of pianists. Whether or not you like his clear, self-conscious style, is of course a matter of personality and taste. His playing is always interesting and of the highest quality, but personally I often find that something is missing. His Mozart didn't have the "fun", his Ravel not the lonely-child feeling, his Debussy not the cat-like soft elegance, his Chopin not the nostalgia, and I havn't even mentioned his Brahms... This and that. I was very surprised then, to hear how well he plays Rachmaninov and what his style can do with that music. He has a very clear and light approach to both concertos. This makes wonders with the first concerto. But even the second gains from his treatment. In the CD booklet he says he wants to play the music as someone in love for the first time, and not look for control. Of course he has perfect control all the time, but he makes a "picture" of emotion which I find genuinly moving. To me it seems a contradiction to find this intellectual musician perfectly at home, for the first time, with Rachmaninov. Or perhaps not? Anyway, he makes these works sing and breathe much easier than they usually do - a great relief. Recommended for Zimerman admirers and for all who could like a light, singing Rachmaninov.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|