Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Difficult But Worthwhile, January 10, 2005
Shiner is a difficult film for most folks. I can see why so many of the reviews are so 'nasty' considering the film itself is 'nasty'. Violence begets violence and a shocking films usually begets shocking reviews. I'm always interested in films that are scored so low and high with little else in between.
The film was marketed to a gay and lesbian audience (as the gay Fight Club) but it's scope is a lot larger. While it does have central gay themes it doesn't cater or appease most gay audiences. It does the opposite. I saw the film because I heard it had tons of walk-outs at festivals and that it had pissed off tons of viewers. I was very happy when I saw it was available on DVD.
The film was produced in a way as to make it seem bare. Like a porno or a snuff film, it looks bleak and scary. Violence erupts without notice and sex and sexuality is completely out of control. The attacks on the films quality are really attacks on its subject matter which is to equate homosexual relationships with relationships where couples like to 'hit' or 'abuse' each other. This is a heavy pill to swallow but one that's unique and refreshing from most independent films I've seen. When you listen to the audio commentary and watch the interview with Calson and the behind-the-scenes on the DVD, you'll understand that Calson was trying to piss folks off. He made choices actively. He was trying to make you aware you were watching a film. Shots go out of focus, sound blows out, actors in an emotional scene become actors in a porn scene. The film has a vacuum effect much like porn yet it's emotions and tragedy are farther reaching. The film belongs to a category of films called 'Anti-Films' or films where the medium doesn't try to suggest it's anything but that, film.
There is tons of nudity and the behavior is very ugly and downright gory, both physically and emotionally. The blood and violence exists on multiple planes in the same way that say 'Kill Bill' did. Sometimes blood is real looking and other times it looks fake and invites your laughter. The main movie I would compare Shiner to is 'The Piano Teacher', which is a very ugly character study of a sado-masochistic piano teacher by Michael Haneke. That film is equally disturbing and dirty yet pays off if you can laugh at it to release it's hold and pressure on you as well as let it get under your skin.
If you are looking for a film that you will either love or hate, then Shiner is for you. If you want a sweet romantic film that will allow you to forget your troubles and drift away into another world, then this isn't it. You have been warned. You will most likely love it or hate it and there'll be little in between. What is remarkable is that someone would make a film as daring and powerful their first time out. What is also worth examining is why someone would see the world this way and what Calson is trying to say about sex, gay culture, and violence. Perhaps that it exists without warning and commands so much of our terror and attention.
|
|
|
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
What a Mess!, May 11, 2005
What an unfortunate mess is "Shiner." I wanted to like this over-the-top, anti-film aspirant, and in fact found a number of moments with powerful resonance. Sadly, those moments are few and far between. While I appreciate some of what Calson was attempting, any advantage aspired to by bare bones, no budget cinematography was destroyed with some truly atrocious editing that benefited the movie not at all.
While bad acting abounds in low budget (and big budget) cinema, Shiner has some remarkably bad performances that are nearly painful to watch. In particular the "straight" couple Linda and Young Guy. These are the two most poorly written characters offering almost nothing to the story. The acting is so abysmal and neither actor seems capable of resisting smirking or cracking up as they drearily drop their lines with an appalling lack of skill. The choppy editing almost lends the feeling that these roles were entirely gratuitous and dropped in to avoid the films being stereotypically cast as an oddball gay film. It would have been better off as such.
With all that is going wrong for it, there are several performances that seem to capture what Calson was hoping to get. In particular the story centering on Bob and Tim. These are the two most richly drawn characters and offer the most rewards with genuinely captivating performances by Nicholas T. King (Bob) and David Zelinas (Tim). Tim is a boxer with some serious issues. Remarkably low self esteem is disguised by an almost cartoon like arrogance that he wears like armour plating. Obsessed with Tim, the seemingly harmless yet ultimately creepy Bob, stalks the boxer in clasic cat-and-mouse fashion. When the tables are turned and hunter becomes the hunted, the resulting in the film's only genuine emotional catharsis. In a film so artificially hard-edged (that's a compliment) one character MUST have that revelatory break through (or breakdown, as the case proves here) and the final confrontation between Bob and Tim provide Zelinas and King opportunity to display some real acting chops.
As played by Scott Stepp and Derris Nile, Tony and Danny seem to be the focus of the movie, and despite some bravado moments of their own (including one truly disturbing scene revealing the sex/violence obsession), but they can't seem to escape a cartoon-like artifice and it's difficult to look at - or beyond their seeming one note symphony and find anything other than the obvious.
Ultimately this same raw material could (and should) be used to tell this story in better fashion. Alas, there really isn't much to recommend this yet, the performances by Messrs. King and Zelinas, really do offer something special and a glimpse of what might have been and are ultimately worth seeing.
|
|
|
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Is there a rating lower than 1 star??, December 14, 2004
A complete waste of time. This is an incomprehensible non-movie about a bunch of low-life sado-masochists.
The camera work, done with a single hand held camera will make you dizzy as will the incompetent editing. There's no plot that I could keep track of. I consider myself to be reasonably intelligent. If I don't "get it," and I don't, the problem isn't with me.
The make-up effects are laughable. I think they used red nail polish to simulate blood. Even ketchup would have worked better.
An even better choice would be to skip this waste of time entirely. How do movies this bad ever get produced? It's a mystery...
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
DVD ~ Candy Clark
DVD ~ Daniel Newman
DVD ~ Steve John Shepherd
DVD ~ Matthew Montgomery
DVD ~ Andre Noble
the Internet Movie Database, which is visited by millions of movie and tv lovers each month.
