D-Link DIR-330 NetDefend 802.11G Wireless VPN Firewall 8 4-Port 10/100Mbps Switch

Other products by D-Link

Product Details

• Product Dimensions: 10.8 x 8.2 x 2.7 inches ; 1.6 pounds
• Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Shipping: Currently, item can be shipped only within the U.S.
• ASIN: B000OFXKGW
• Item model number: DIR-330
• Average Customer Review: 2.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #84 in	Electronics > Accessories & Supplies > Microphones > Wired
  #89 in	Electronics > Computers & Accessories > Networking Products > Switches

• Date first available at Amazon.com: March 16, 2007

Product Description

Product Description

D-Link DIR-330 NetDefend 802.11G Wireless VPN Firewall 8 4-Port 10/100Mbps Switch

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Only cheap choice for WinXP VPN client - 4 months later - DON'T GET IT, December 18, 2008

By	E. Richards (San Jose CA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

April 2009:
I'm updating my review because this simply doesn't work.

The VPN from Windows to it ONLY works if you're not behind a NAT. With the NAT-Traversal turned on it get's to the second phase of authentication but never gets all the way. ie The encrypted packets start but it doesn't authenticate after that. I have many Wireshark pcap packet files showing the problem from multiple NAT locations. The only thing that works is my WWAN 3G PCcard directly hooked into Verizon - and that's because it's not NAT'ed.

Interop VPN Certified - yeah right. NOT.


There is also another problem. Dlink is using Dynamic DNS.org's service for it's dlink-ddns.com BUT DDNS's policy is to only allow same IP address update at minimum every 2 weeks. BUT the router's max is 100hours. After a few "violations" of their policy they disable the account. SO... DDNS tracking doesn't work either.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec 2008
Despite all the negative talk on the web about this router I took a chance - primarily for one reason - It seems to be the ONLY router out there that supports Windows XP VPN client. (I had to return the Netgear vpn prosafe router because of this). - I already have a D-link router and it has been solid for years.

DIR-330:
The web interface seems solid to me.
Here are the features/info I'm using.

Firmware 1.12 (came on the router in the box)

LAN 172.17.x.x with DHCP from 172.17.0.100..200

WiFi: WPA2-PSK/AES

WAN fully automatic DHCP connection to AT&T DSL modem.

Note:- I have had other D-link routers crash after a day until I found this out.... The AT&T DSL Modem hijacks 192.168.0.1 and screws up the routing tables if you have 192.168.0.x on the LAN side. SO - Don't use 192.168.0.x on the LAN side! (I was using 10.x.x.x until I installed this new router. The reason I changed from 10.x.x.x to 172.17.x.x was that when I VPN in there is a good chance that it'll be on a 192.168.0.x or 10.x.x.x network since these are so common. To make it so that I don't have the potential for any IP conflicts I chose a lesser used private network mask (from the 172.16.x.x...172.31.255.255 range). This allows me to keep static ip assignments in my \WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts file without worrying about DNS working etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network

The VPN was configured so that the VPN server is 172.18.0.1 and the VPN DHCP range 172.18.0.100..200

The VPN is set up as L2TP/IPsec for the most security.

I'm using the free Dynamic DNS from dlinkddns.com (built into the router) to track my DSL's real IP address and so far it's FANTASTIC!. I have a CNAME alias to it from my domain name serving at the (also free) everyDNS.net so that I can have "vpn.mydomain.com" instead of "blahblah.dlinkddns.com"

I have not noticed any bandwidth drop from the older D-link router to this one. I can still watch streaming HD from Netflix on my TiVo-HD connected via WiFi.

I'd give it 5 out of 5 but it's lacking a VPN wizard and it took me a little while to work out how to configure it. The docs on the right column of the web interface could be more featured too (in particular the ddns page).

So.. I'd say give it a go.

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Stay away, June 18, 2008

By	Nathan Boyd - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This is the absolute worst product I ever bought. I bought it explicitly for the VPN accessibility. I never got that to work. If you have to forward a port..make sure you know what you're doing cause once you choose the port, you can't go back and change it.

Also, which was rather nice (sarcastic)....the people in support were able to establish a vpn connection to my router but I couldn't. I used 3 different machines with the trial software they recommend. Their solution was that instead of using the trial software..BUY their product and then try it.

I never write reviews but I don't want anyone getting screwed with this thing.

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Worst router with lot of features missing ... ...., September 18, 2008

By	Selvamohan Neethiraj "selvajavaone" (Sterling, VA, USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This router would disconnect all connections when you SAVE the changes to the router. Usually, that happens on router only when you reboot the router.

'NAT Loopback' feature is missing. If you are a small business firm, please stay away from this router. You can not access 'Port forwarding feature on port 80' from LAN.... You can use it only from WAN.


Support from DLINK is so poor. You ask some questions, they come back with answers for totally different questions. For example, I asked questions regarding why connections get disconnected when the router changes are saved. Dlink support comes back with a follow-up question as how do I reconnect the connection ? So support from dlink gets ZERO mark....

I do have other DLINK routers (dir-625,...) that works much better. But, this one is meant to spoil their brand ....