Qty:1
$13.09 + $3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by Music123

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Add to Cart
$13.09
+ $3.49 shipping
Sold by: Woodwind and Brasswind
2 new from $13.09
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Pearl Surdo Mallet

by Pearl
5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

List Price: $24.00
Price: $13.09 + $3.49 shipping
You Save: $10.91 (45%)
In Stock.
Estimated Delivery Date: April 7 - 11 when you choose Expedited Shipping at checkout.
Ships from and sold by Music123.
2 new from $13.09
$13.09 + $3.49 shipping In Stock. Ships from and sold by Music123.


Product Information

Item Weight 21 pounds
Product Dimensions 15 x 1 x 1 inches
Shipping Weight 4.3 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
ASIN B00280L5PO
Item model number PBSM20
Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #32,819 in Musical Instruments (See Top 100 in Musical Instruments)
#2,023 in Musical Instruments > Drums & Percussion
Date first available at Amazon.com April 29, 2009

Feedback

Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)
1.  Quality Mallet? opens new browser window
  -  
The best Quality Mallets. Safe Payment methods. Buy now!

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
Decent surdo mallet with a smallish, dense head. Nicely lacquered handle.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By Jay on June 12, 2015
Verified Purchase
perfect
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse