Qty:1
$5.08 + Free Shipping
In Stock. Sold by Dog -n- Cat Pet Supply

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other Sellers on Amazon
3 new from $5.08

Epi-Pet Ear Cleaner for Pets, 4-Ounce

by Epi-Pet
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

List Price: $33.30
Price: $5.08 & FREE Shipping
You Save: $28.22 (85%)
Only 9 left in stock.
Estimated Delivery Date: April 12 - 15 when you choose Standard at checkout.
Ships from and sold by Dog -n- Cat Pet Supply.
  • Cleans ear and skin of outer ear canal
  • Removes Wax and Debris
  • Non-greasy and non-oily Solution
  • Deodorizes and removes unpleasant smell
  • Contains Aloe Vera and Tea Tree Oil
3 new from $5.08

$5.08 & FREE Shipping Only 9 left in stock. Ships from and sold by Dog -n- Cat Pet Supply.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Epi-Pet Ear Cleaner for Pets, 4-Ounce
  • +
  • Epi-Pet Lavender Skin Enrichment Spray for Pets, 16-Ounce
  • +
  • Epi-Pet Cleansing Agent Pet Shampoo, 16-Ounce
Total price: $41.57
Buy the selected items together



Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 1.8 x 1.8 x 6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B002SCUPJ4
  • Item model number: 90712
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #105,982 in Pet Supplies (See Top 100 in Pet Supplies)

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By CAT on April 13, 2013
Verified Purchase
My cats love the ear cleaner and so do I. Recommend it to anyone that has pets with sensitive ears. Thank you.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse