Qty:1
$181.54 + Free Shipping
In Stock. Sold by Galactics

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Add to Cart
$181.54
+ Free Shipping
Sold by: my Goods
Add to Cart
$199.00
& FREE Shipping on eligible orders. Details
Sold by: InFocus Corporation
Add to Cart
$199.00
+ Free Shipping
Sold by: MegaRetailStore
10 new from $25.81
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

InFocus KH3035 INF-WALLMNT2 Wall Mount for 16-35 Inch Flat Panel Displays

by InFocus
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

List Price: $225.00
Price: $181.54 & FREE Shipping
You Save: $43.46 (19%)
Only 8 left in stock.
Estimated Delivery Date: Thursday, April 28 when you choose Two-Day Shipping at checkout.
Ships from and sold by Galactics.

Want professional installation of this product?

  • Handpicked pros
  • Compare estimates and reviews
  • Buy directly on Amazon
  • Backed by Amazon's Happiness Guarantee
  • Built-in cable stand provides easy access under the screen
  • Integrated security, just add a padlock
  • Low-profile tilt
10 new from $25.81
$181.54 & FREE Shipping Only 8 left in stock. Ships from and sold by Galactics.


Technical Details

  • Screen Size compatibility: 37 - 70"


Product Information

Technical Details

Brand Name InFocus
Item Weight 1 pounds
Product Dimensions 1 x 1 x 1 inches
Item model number KH3035
Color Name Black
Special Features Screen Size compatibility: 37 - 70"

Additional Information

ASIN B00556I88K
Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #5,785 in Electronics > Accessories & Supplies > Audio & Video Accessories > TV Accessories & Parts > TV Ceiling & Wall Mounts
#7,279 in Electronics > Accessories & Supplies > Mounts
#24,704 in Electronics > Accessories & Supplies > Cell Phone Accessories > Car Accessories
Shipping Weight 18.7 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Date First Available July 25, 2011

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
This thing is strong! It's very sturdily constructed so I have no qualms that my huge and heavy MondoPad will stay up on the wall until eternity. There's no shifting or movement when I need to tilt the screen up or down. The screen-side mount locks in nice and secure onto the bars, and the loops for removing it is a nice touch (I've used other mounts that were difficult to take apart because of restricted space behind the screen.) Overall, nice and secure.

I like the dual-bar design, as this allows us to slide the screen back and forth a few inches as needed, which is important if you're mounting this to studs as we did, since chances are the studs aren't perfectly positioned for the screen. We ended up having the screen sitting a few inches to the right of center on the mount, but again it's plenty strong to handle that and it was nice being able to have the freedom to place the screen just right on the wall.

It came with every possible type of mounting hardware you can imagine, for mounting to any surface, and the hardware, like the mount itself, is very strong and capable.

It was relatively easy to install, as well. No wall mount is a cake-walk to install (considering the need for perfect horizontal alignment and placing the screws in just the right spot on the wall) but the flexibility of this design made it particularly easy to get it right the first time.

All in all, I'd get this mount again if we got another MondoPad, or any other large heavy screen.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse