Qty:1

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Perfect Stix Wooden Birchwood Coffee Stirrer Stix, 7" Length (Pack of 1,000)

5 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

Price: $11.10 ($0.01 / Sticks) & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
In Stock.
Want it tomorrow, March 29? Order within and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Perfect Stix
Part Number FS203-1000
Material Type Wood
Number of Items 1000
Additional Features NSF Certified
EAN 0788581102916
Overall Height 1  mm
Overall Length 178  mm
Overall Width 6.35  mm
Specification Met FSC , FDA , ISO 9001 , ISO 9002 , SSOP
UNSPSC Code 52151505
UPC 788581102916

Amazon Business Amazon Business



Product Features

  • Measures 178mm length by 6.35mm width by 1mm height
  • High quality wooden product
  • Coffee/Tea

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 2.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • Shipping Advisory: This item must be shipped separately from other items in your order. Additional shipping charges will not apply.
  • ASIN: B009EE2NLW
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #33,115 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)

Frequently Bought Together

  • Perfect Stix Wooden  Birchwood Coffee Stirrer Stix, 7" Length (Pack of 1,000)
  • +
  • Frito-Lay Chips Classic mix Multipack, 20 Count
Total price: $19.89
Buy the selected items together



Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By M. Merchut on March 13, 2014
Verified Purchase
I own a range of mug sizes from 8oz. to 16oz. in volume, which vary in height from 3-1/2" to 4-1/2 inches high. The 7" length of the #FS203 is ideal for any of these mugs, giving you an ideal and natural looking handle length(compared to the 5" length of the FS201). The flat shape moves liquid more efficiently than a round/tubular stir stick and the rounded edges fit the contour of coffee mugs and feels good in your hand(compare to the square edges of the less costly #FS202). The pack of 1,000 will last me a long time and is a good value. The box these came in was starting to fall apart, and would suggest to the Mfg. or supplier spend the extra pennies for better packaging. The box doesn't affect my opinion of the product so much as the Mfg.. The FS204 is practically the same item, but measures 7-1/2" in length, but since I felt and still feel the 7" length is sufficient...... I bought these. My wife and I are happy with them.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I needed this for an extensive craft project. The ad for these sticks is great, in that I had no surprises. The round edges was very important, the machining on the stirrers is perfect.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Bought these for my father who was in and out of hospitals and rehab centers. Too many times they gave him coffee without a stirrer; Work well.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Perfect length! Very happy and would buy again.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse