Qty:1
$7.95 + Free Shipping
In Stock. Sold by Innovet Pet Products

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.

60cc (2oz) Soft Hand Feeder with 8mm Silicone Tip

4.5 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: $7.95 & FREE Shipping
Only 15 left in stock.
Estimated Delivery Date: Monday, April 4 when you choose Two-Day Shipping at checkout.
Ships from and sold by Innovet Pet Products. Gift-wrap available.
  • Soft Silicone Tip Won't Harm Teeth or Gums
  • Soft Silicone Tip is 75mm (3") long and 8mm diameter
  • Durable Laminated Graduation Scale
  • Can Be Used With Thick formula
  • Superior To All Other Hand Feeding Syringes On The Market

$7.95 & FREE Shipping Only 15 left in stock. Ships from and sold by Innovet Pet Products. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • 60cc (2oz) Soft Hand Feeder with 8mm Silicone Tip
  • +
  • Innovet Pet Products Silicone Pet Feeding Syringe, 30cc
  • +
  • Lixit Hand Feeding Syringe, 35cc
Total price: $18.10
Buy the selected items together


Product Details

  • Item Weight: 0.6 ounces
  • Shipping Weight: 0.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B00GKS5AQ0
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #69,748 in Pet Supplies (See Top 100 in Pet Supplies)

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

5 star
50%
4 star
50%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
Excellent product and service
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Works fairly well for cats.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse