Buy New
$27.70
Qty:1
& FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
THE BEST OF THE GUESS WHO has been added to your Cart
Want it Thursday, April 21? Order within and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Ship to:
To see addresses, please
or
Please enter a valid US zip code.
or

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other Sellers on Amazon
5 used & new from $27.70
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

THE BEST OF THE GUESS WHO Hybrid SACD - DSD

3.9 out of 5 stars 32 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Audio CD, Hybrid SACD - DSD, June 9, 2015
"Please retry"
$27.70
$27.70 $60.15
$27.70 & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • THE BEST OF THE GUESS WHO
  • +
  • THE BEST OF BREAD
  • +
  • BLOOD, SWEAT & TEARS
Total price: $87.89
Buy the selected items together

Product Details

  • Audio CD (June 9, 2015)
  • Original Release Date: June 9, 2015
  • Number of Discs: 1
  • Format: Hybrid SACD - DSD
  • Label: Audio Fidelity
  • ASIN: B00PRL13XA
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (32 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,032 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By David J. Stash on March 10, 2015
Verified Purchase
It's nice to have this surround sound reissue. Great songs somewhat diminished by a less than stellar surround mix. Most of the content is pitched to the back channels for some reason, with the requisite spin around the room surround effects added on. Nonetheless, a nice addition to the surround collection. An essential buy for the Guess Who fans. The other Guess Who and Burton Cummings "quadraphonic" stuff should get release. Edit post comment: the 4.0 sound field, with no isolated center channel, makes for the more widely dispersed audio range. After three listening sessions today, I am pleased with what has been added to the SACD catalog with this release.
Comment 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Just to add a bit to the first reviewer's comments:

The sound quality is quite good. Nice high end, the bass just a tad undermixed, but we can adjust that to our liking.

I have my speakers set up for a 5.1 offering. The 4.0 mix is designed for the speakers to be in each corner, so perhaps I should cut a little slack.

An interesting thing happened while I was listening. I moved my head back about 6 inches and suddenly the sound came alive. The sweet spot for the 4.0 mix was in a different spot compared to the 5.1 sound. Once I found it, things were a lot better.

Maybe the best thing about the Guess Who was Burton Cumming's voice. Wish there was a dedicated center channel featuring him, but oh well. Overall a very nice offering for us multi-channel people.
4 Comments 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
For the most part, the hits are here on "The Best Of The Guess Who (Hybrid SACD 4.0 Multichannel.)" I really like the compilation--so much so that I own the original vinyl (bought back in the day for $3.33) and years later I purchased the stereo CD. (Sadly the CD has gone missing--part of the reason that I purchased this recently released SACD.) But overall "The Best Of The Guess Who (Hybrid SACD 4.0 Multichannel)" disappoints.

I own several SACDs (multichannel and stereo) sourced from the original master tapes that were recorded in the 1960s and 1970s. They offer audio quality that blows me away. Unfortunately, "The Best Of The Guess Who (Hybrid SACD 4.0 Multichannel)" is not one of them. Instead it reveals how poorly recorded some albums were back in the day. It also shows how an SACD mastering engineer can get pan happy. (Sorry, Mr. Hoffman, if you did this, but it is what it is.)

I have a top notch audio system (a relative term, of course) that plays multichannel SACDs quite well. It clearly reveals the deficits of the Guess Who master tapes. For one thing there is practically no high end on this SACD. The first three tracks ("These Eyes," "Laughing," and "Undun") are especially devoid of highs and wind up sounding much like an FM table radio. The subsequent tracks are somewhat better with the high end--although not stellar by any stretch of the imagination.

I attribute this largely to the lower recording quality of the master tapes (multitrack and mixdown) and to the age of the master tapes when Audio Fidelity got ahold of them. There probably wasn't much that Mr. Hoffman could do to improve on this without making matters even worse. His restraint is appreciated.
Read more ›
10 Comments 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I agree with Nikkon Jeff's overall review of this SACD. I especially find that the first few songs definitely suffer from lower sound quality; which improves with the tracks taken from the later albums. On 'These Eyes', the song sounds muddy because they put the bass in all four speakers, so the lower octaves overwhelm the highs. I obtain better balance by rolling off the surrounds at 120 Hz and raising the treble a bit. Also, remember that we are used to hearing this song ad infinitum with a juiced up high end, so any changes in balance take some time to become accustomed to. With 'Laughing' I can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear no matter what I do. I also made some tweeks to the other tracks on side one which helped a bit. I don't like the panning either. I heard that this was one of RCA's first quad releases and there was a tendency to include aural gymnastics such as panning to demonstrate the capability of the medium.

The acid test is to go back and listen to the stereo versions of 'No Time' and 'American Woman' in simulated 7.1 surround. In comparison, the overall sound quality of the quad SACD comes across much better. I find myself listening to the quad SACD at higher volume levels than the CD, which is another indicator of better sound quality and dynamic range. I especially like the opening guitars on 'American Woman' twanging from all four speakers. So I believe that this is the best sounding version of this title that we are going to get, so I have rated it with that in mind.

One last tidbit: I understand that Steve Hoffman does not master the surround sound tracks on any of these Audio Fidelity SACDs. He just does the stereo mastering.
1 Comment 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I don't have a surround sound setup but I do have a bluray player which allows me to listen to the SACD layer. The difference is very interesting between the two layers where the conventional stereo is concerned. With the exception of the overall lack of lower end on These Eyes, the "regular" layer is stellar. crisp, smooth bass, beautiful separation...and, as it's been mentioned, the later the date of the recording, the better the overall sound gets.

However, when I played the SACD stereo layer in my bluray, I was a bit confused. For starters, it continually sounded like the volume was favoring the right channel. At first I wondered if these were mono mixes for the SACD layer but, in time, I heard some actual separation. There is, however, TOO much bass and low end on most of the tracks (particularly the "side one" songs per the original vinyl LP). Also, American Woman is not the LP version on the SACD layer but that's minor.

All said and done, while the SACD layer has it's ups as well as downs, this is the first SACD/hybrid for which I actually prefer the "regular" layer.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Forums

Set up an Amazon Giveaway

THE BEST OF THE GUESS WHO
Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more
This item: THE BEST OF THE GUESS WHO


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?




Look for Similar Items by Category

Pages with Related Products. See and discover other items: vinyl pop