|
|
36 of 43 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Man Ray angle is bogus -- you could look it up, June 2, 2003
By A Customer
Part of Steve Hodel's "proof" that his father, Dr. George Hodel, was the Black Dahlia killer, rests on Dr. Hodel's supposed close relationship with artist and photographer Man Ray, whom the author claims shared his father's "sadistic" personality. Hodel's case against his father is flimsy enough, but he really falls off a cliff when he brings in Man Ray, about whom much is known and documented.Let's start with concrete, verifiable facts. Hodel claims that Man Ray left Hollywood and moved back to France in the winter of 1949-1950, just after Dr. Hodel's incest trial, for fear of being implicated in the sex crimes scandal himself. Hodel's source for this information is a man named Joe Barrett, who says he rented part of Dr. Hodel's house from 1948 through 1950. Barrett claims that Man Ray came to the house to say goodbye to Dr. Hodel just before leaving the country, and while he was there talked to Barrett for an hour. In reality, Man Ray did not leave Hollywood until March of 1951, a year after Dr. Hodel had fled and sold the house in question. Incredibly, Barrett, who "remembers" things that could not have happened, is Hodel's main source tying Man Ray to his father as a regular associate. Nothing known about Man Ray supports this claim, and the only real evidence Hodel presents indicates no more than a minor professional relationship. Hodel claims that Man Ray went to France for several months during the height of the Black Dahlia murder investigation. According to Hodel's own book, the height of the investigation ran from late January through March of 1947, although Hodel says the supposed police cover-up of his father's guilt was underway by February. In reality, Man Ray made his first and only extended trip from Hollywood in August of 1947, months after the case had gone cold. Hodel's dubious sources also claim that Man Ray's "clout" as a famous artist kept him out of Dr. Hodel's sex crimes trial, leaving the impression that Man Ray enjoyed the same stature then as he does now. In reality, Man Ray was not particularly well known in the US in the 1940s, especially not on the West Coast, nor was he particularly well off. Whatever repute he had was mainly as a portrait and fashion photographer, two things he did only for money and wanted to get away from. For perspective, consider the painting "The Lovers", which Hodel correctly identifies as one of Man Ray's best-known works. When last sold in 1979, it set a record for the most paid for a surrealist painting. But for most of Man Ray's decade in Hollywood, it gathered dust in his apartment. He finally sold it in 1948, for $2000. It's hard to see where Man Ray would have gotten the clout to keep himself out of a criminal investigation when he didn't even have the clout to sell his best work. All this information is readily available in the standard biography of the artist by Neil Baldwin. Man Ray's travel and financial affairs are well documented through his correspondence with his sister, who, with her husband, acted as his agent, business manager, and accountant. Now to Hodel's wild claims about Man Ray's supposedly sadistic personality, which Hodel uses, by extension, to show his like-minded father was capable of the Black Dahlia murder. Hodel tosses out whoppers like "Man Ray was a devoted sadist" who "believed women exist for man's pleasure, which is only enhanced through the humiliation, degradation, and infliction of pain upon them," yet fails to adduce any proof. Not surprisingly, because none exists. In reality, the worst that can be said about Man Ray is that some minority of his work contains sadistic elements. When asked about works that showed this tendency, he told an early biographer: "I did them because I would hate doing anything like them in real life." I suppose a negative can never be proven absolutely, but Man Ray has been the subject of steady biographical inquiry for the last 20 years. Two of his long-term lovers have garnered biographical studies in their own right. While Man Ray could be difficult, and there's credible evidence that he got into physical altercations with one lover (she hit him, too -- and was bigger), there is nothing to suggest anything remotely like what Hodel claims. Not even rumors. As for Man Ray's attitudes toward women, although not entirely politically correct by today's standard, they were enlightened for a man of his generation. He took his female colleagues seriously as fellow artists, encouraged the women around him (friends, lovers, and relatives) in their artistic endeavors, and maintained warm friendships with women who offered him no sexual opportunities, including most of his ex-lovers. Hodel's only attempt to show, rather than assert, that Man Ray was a "sadist" is to invoke the Marquis de Sade, whom Man Ray admired as a writer and social critic, and for his obstinacy toward institutional authority. Saying that admiring Sade makes someone a "sadist", in the common or clinical sense, is evidence of nothing except Hodel's willingness to play semantic games and presume his reader's stupidity. All this is bad enough by itself, but Hodel's main proof that his father was an extreme sadist, capable of committing the Black Dahlia murder, is that HE admired Sade, and, well, was a lot like Man Ray. The only allegations Hodel makes against his father that have any credibility are that Dr. Hodel molested, or at least acted sexually inappropriately toward, his daughter and granddaughter. But these acts, as described, could not be called "sadistic" in the language of sex-crime psychology. It's a long way from there to torture-and-mutilation murder. If Dr. George Hodel molested his daughter or granddaughter, he should have gone to jail. But what does that have to do with the Black Dahlia case? Like most of this book, not much.
|