The Salon.com Reader's Guide to Contemporary Authors (Paperback)

~ Laura Miller (Editor), Adam Begley (Editor)
Key Phrases: bloody chamber, moral fiction, New York, Reader's Guide, Contemporary Authors (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

Selling itself as a handbook for readers who consume books "for pleasure," The Salon.com Reader's Guide to Contemporary Authors hopes to fill a perceived gap on the reference shelf. Its editor, Laura Miller, declares in the preface: "We didn't imagine an audience of researchers or scholars or critics or prize committees or members of the publishing industry, even if some of those people still do occasionally read a book with the hopes of enjoying it." The chief irony of this claim is that this Baedeker originated at Salon.com--a den of insiders, merciless critics, and juicy gossip. And there's plenty here that the "pure" reader wouldn't need to know: the dirt on big advances, whose career went into a tailspin, what the reviewers said. If Miller's aim was to escape the careerists of the publishing world, she has nevertheless assembled a book they'll eat like catnip.

And a highly original book it is, too. Like Salon.com itself, it collapses the distance between highbrow and lowbrow. Stephen King and Mario Puzo coexist with Lydia Davis and Donald Antrim; as a result, the game quickly becomes one of who is not included and who is. To Miller's credit, the answers continually surprise (though several omissions are regrettable). Loosely limiting authors to those who have some "contemporary" presence, entries attempt to place these writers in their time, to argue for their importance and influence. The entries themselves often suffer from bad writing; here's a metaphor that should be blocked: "If you could grab hold of one of O'Brien's images and wrestle it up from the page, you'd find long roots sunk deep into the earth. There's blood coursing through her exquisite prose, balancing its seeming delicacy with solidity and weight." Or, my favorite moment of exasperating silliness: "Are you sure you hate Bret Easton Ellis as much as you hate yourself?" A more limited pool of reviewers would have diminished a feeling of unevenness that undermines the book's authoritative posture. The best writing comes from Miller herself, who has emerged as the Pauline Kael of the book scene. Her prose is effortlessly provocative.

Often an entry about a writer's work will be followed by an essay by that author. These added essays and digressions are wonderfully varied and idiosyncratic: David Gates on "Breaking Up with the Beats," Dorothy Allison on why "Every Novel Is a Lesbian Novel," and though Calvin Trillin isn't assessed, he is allowed to write about "Books That Made Me Laugh." Combined with the guide's primary information, these additions allow the reader a glimpse into the chatter of famous authors--an imaginary tea party free of mercenaries and showoffs, of course, where pure-hearted readers hold forth about the joy of books and everybody has a turn. --Ellen Williams

From Booklist

Can't decide what to suggest for your book club's next selection? Now that Oprah has made fiction cool, it seems only fitting that Salon, the hip electronic magazine, would come to the aid of the reading-group crowd. This guide to contemporary authors of literary fiction ("whose major works were published since 1960") falls somewhere between cutesy book chat and a shorthand version of Masterplots. Each entry, from Edward Abbey through Stephen Wright, contains a listing of the author's works, a one-or two-page overview of the oeuvre, and a few read-alike suggestions. Sprinkled throughout the text are sidebar lists and essays by well-known writers (Erica Jong's favorite "smart and sexy" novels). Inevitably, the quality of the entries varies dramatically--from book-report bland to genuinely insightful. But that's the fun of this kind of book: browsing at top speed, dismissing as you go, and then being brought up short by a nugget like Jonatham Lethem (Motherless Brooklyn [BKL Jl 99]) on Bernard Malamud. If your commitment to lit crit extends only as long as it takes to drink a latte, this is the book for you. Bill Ott
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 512 pages
• Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics) (August 1, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 014028088X
• ISBN-13: 978-0140280883
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 7.4 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (31 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #206,900 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #65 in

  Books > Reference > Publishing & Books > Bibliographies & Indexes > Literature

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars great... both an indispensible tool and a DAMN good read, September 25, 2000

By	eric - See all my reviews

this is what I needed! and so many other people too... a place to run when someone talks glibly about some author... you want a basic, opinionated take on them, and you want a list of the person's books -- but with a sub-list of the ones that are notable and should be read. AND you want the word on "what is the ONE book by them that you should read if you were only to read one?"

I just wish to god they had this for popular music. and maybe they're doing it. would be a harder task.

LOVE this book.

13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting . . ., August 20, 2000

By A Customer

Opinionated--Yes. Irreverent--Somewhat. Eclectic--Definitely.

Some choices I just don't understand (Mario Puzo? John Grisham? Bret Easton Ellis? Tom Clancy? Jacqueline Susann? These people are "Fascinating"? Um, No.)

But, a lot of excellent, even brilliant, authors are included that would otherwise be overlooked: Sherman Alexie ("The Lone Ranger..." stories are just brilliant), Paul Auster ("City of Glass"), TC Boyle ("Collected Stories"), Raymond Carver (ANYTHING by Carver), VS Naipul ("A House for Mr. Biswas"--stunning), David Foster Wallace ("Infinite Jest"--you'll never look at a book the same way again!), and my personal favorite--Lydia Davis ("Break It Down"--A MUST READ/ditto "The End of the Story"). The usual OWM (old white men) deservedly get mentioned: Roth, Irving, Bellow, Mailer, Wolfe, Vidal. Even if you don't like them, their work has certainly shaped American writing.

Overall, an interesting selection of contemporary authors. Could have been a little more comprehensive on each entry, but still fairly thorough. Interesting trivia throughout.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Reading For Fun Instead Of Duty, September 7, 2000

By	R. W. Rasband (Heber City, UT) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

What impresses me about this book is that the critics involved write about what pleases them instead of what they think is the *correct* thing to read. Kurt Vonnegut, who has taken it on the chin from many reviewers lately, gets a warm appreciation from Dave Eggers. And Bret Easton Ellis gets a non-poisonous review (not that I like Ellis all that much, but it's nice to see a dissent from the conventional wisdom for a change.) A few writers get dissed: Michael Crichton is quickly chopped into hamburger, and Edwidge Danticat and Alice Walker are surprisingly (but accurately) dismissed as non-entities. Saul Bellow gets a mixed review. My favorite old white guy, Philip Roth, gets a positive write-up and I learned about possible new authors to read like Geoff Nicholson. One limitation: the exclusion of translated works leaves out a master like Milan Kundera. And any collection that includes the hack John Grisham and leaves out the wonderful Scott Turow needs a reality check. (The "See Also" paragraphs that follow each main review help make up for some of the most obvious exclusions.) Well worth your time.