Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
38 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An imaginative telling of Mary Magdalene's life, October 29, 2003
After reading The DaVinci Code, I became very interested in Mary Magdalene and her place in history. While she is not cast in the same role as in TDC (which I won't divulge here for those who haven't read the book), I almost like her place in this telling better. She is written as a strong woman who after many years of struggling between possession by pagan gods and her faith in God, is healed by Jesus and becomes one of his disciples. Since no one knows the true story of MM, Margaret George had to create an entire life for her, giving her the roles of daughter in a pious Jewish family, wife of a man she questions her love for, mother to a daughter whom she conceived after making a deal with one of her pagan possessors, and loyal friend to a girl who follows a different branch of Judaism of which her family doesn't approve. The book starts out slowly laying a foundation for Mary's life, but read on. After she initially meets Jesus when she is a young girl and finds the idol that becomes the source of her possession problems, things begin to pick up speed. The second half of the book is about her life as a disciple of Jesus and the Passion from her viewpoint. It's also about her undying love for her daughter who was taken from her at the age of two after she began following Jesus and her family disowned her. As usual, George has done an incredible amount of research into her subject and has written yet another fictional biography that will take you to another world.
|
|
|
37 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Too Many Problems With This Disappointing Book, July 31, 2002
Problem No. 1: The characters,including Mary,are surprisingly flat. In spite of sharing Mary's inner thoughts and feelings,I never felt I really got to know her. Problem No. 2: Too many important incidents are either downplayed or completely ignored. The raising of Lazarus from the dead is never mentioned,while other incidents,such as Jesus turning the water into wine and the feeding of the multitudes,are dismissed by Mary as having never happened. Worst of all,the miracle of Jesus's divine conception and birth are never mentioned. His mother admits to having had visions of his importance when he was a child, but never once says anything about the visitation from the angel telling her she has been chosen to give birth to the Messiah, the immaculate conception,or any of the miracles and signs at his birth. By it's very ommision,it leads the reader to conclude that Jesus was the biological child of Joseph,not divinely concieved by a virgin mother. Problem No. 3: Mary seems to be instrumental in far too many places. After Mary and Joanna discover the Garden of Gethsemane,it is Mary who tells Jesus about it when He expresses a desire to find a quiet,peaceful place to meditate. Mary and Joanna also sneak into Herod's palace and disguise themselves as serving women in order to spy on Herod,and thus are there to witness Judas accepting the bribe from Caiphas and Annas to betray Jesus. Once again,it is Mary who tells Jesus of Judas's betrayal, even though in the bible it seems rather clear that Judas's betrayal was foretold to Jesus by God in a divine revelation instead. When Jesus sends the disciples out in pairs, Mary is paired with John.When John attempts to heal a woman and fails,once again it's Mary to the rescue,and not only does she heal the woman,she is also able to cast the demons out of Joanna,while poor, ineffective John stands by. And there are many other places where this type of scenario plays out. Rather than coming across as an every day woman, she seems to be some sort of latter day Wonder Woman, while the rest of the disciples are rather weak and ineffective. It is this biased slant in Mary's favor that makes this book hard to swallow. A more balanced view,letting the other disciples shine, would have been much more believable. While I am glad to see women of the bible and their contributions being made known and applauded, it should not be done by diminishing the men around them, and I felt that this is what this book does,with the exception of Jesus. All in all this is a very disappointing book. I am quite surprised at this since I read George's Memoirs of Cleopatra,and found it to be rich and vibrant,giving me the feeling I was there and really knew Cleopatra. Sadly,this is not the case here. As long as this book is, I should feel I really know Mary, but instead I come away feeling cheated by a book that has one dimensional characters and a heroine who, far from being an average,everyday woman who finds herself living in an extraordinary time and place, seems instead to be a Super Woman who one ups almost everyone. It is neither realistic or believeable.
|
|
|
43 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Dull, Plodding and Disappointing, August 9, 2004
I love historical novels. I've read everything else Margaret George has written and loved every page, so when I saw _Mary, Called Magdalene_ on the shelf of the local bookstore I bought it without even opening the cover. Boy was that a mistake! This book is so awful, it's hard to believe it was written by the same author. The characters are flat and lifeless, the research is second-rate and the plot is un-moving--and as the book deals with one of the core stories of Western thought (the ministry and passion of Jesus), that's saying a lot. It's as if because the book deals with the topic of faith and religion, the writer's capacity for critical thought went on vacation. There is no real challenge to the story of the gospels as we know it, no new interpretation and no life. Almost every situation Mary meets from the time she becomes a disciple on comes directly--sometimes verbatim--from the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The ones that don't are so boring that it's hard to care about them.
Other things bothered me about this book: the lack of cultural or historical context for the story, the huge emphasis on literal demon possession, which required way more suspension of disbelief than I was able to sustain and the superficial and inaccurate depiction of ancient Judaic religious thought, to name a few. Knowing what I know about these things, George's Jesus affected me not as an enlightened Master, but as a man driven off the deep end by an internal revelation he is unable to communicate, and his followers seemed mindless subscribers to a cult that promises them release from personal pain, much as modern cults do. This is an interesting interpretation, but I don't think it's the one George intended; therefore, I have to say her book didn't work.
Growing up in the home of a minister and Bible scholar, I spent my entire youth surrounded by books, both fiction and non-fiction, that treated Early Christianity and other Biblical subjects with passion and intellect, setting them in an historical context and making them important and real in human terms. _Mary, Called Magdalene_ is not one of them. From the reviews here it seems that a lot of people liked it, but I can't imagine why.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|