The Passion: The True Story of an Event That Changed Human History (Paperback)

~ Geza Vermes (Author) "The Passion of Jesus of Nazareth is part of history, but it is also the central core of Christian theology, the very nucleus of the..." (more)
Key Phrases: night trial, linen shroud, chief priests, King of the Jews, New Testament, Fourth Gospel (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

Geza Vermes is the greatest Jesus scholar of his generation. -- The Sunday Times, London

Review

Geza Vermes is the greatest Jesus scholar of his generation. (The Sunday Times, London)

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 144 pages
• Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics) (January 31, 2006)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0143036882
• ISBN-13: 978-0143036883
• Product Dimensions: 7.7 x 5 x 0.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #386,462 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The Facts, Mam, Nothing But the Facts...., March 17, 2008

By	Big D (Auburn, AL. USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Passion: The True Story of an Event That Changed Human History (Paperback)

As with his other books,"Resurrection" and "The Nativity", Vermes seeks to separate fact from fiction and religious tradition---stories that have accumulated over the years without any basis in fact, stories that were included over trhe years to promote a particular theological view...

The best way to put it is described by noted Christian writer and speaker, Ellsworth Kallas: "The Gospels are like political biographies, written by people seeking to emphasize certain points to certain audiences...." Nothing wrong with that, nothing at all...but what about the facts, the facts, mam, nothng but the facts, as Jack Webb used to say in the old "Dragnet" TV series.

That's what Vermes does: give us the facts, nothing but the facts from a dispassionate "Lay-It-Out-There" perspective.

He takes various Gospel accounts of the Passion and compares them, noting where some timing sequences are just impossible, and, untimately, pointing to John as probably the most historically accurante Gospel.

Also points out that the Gospels seek to minimize Pilate's responsibilty in the Cruxification, casting more blame on the Jews, when in reality, when the Gospels were written, the writers were seeking to convert Romans and other Gentiles to the faith, having for the most part, given up on converting Jews. Hence, they "went light" on Pilate and followed the anti-Jewish tenor of the times in which the Gospels were written.

A very good book. Very informative and provocative.

So, Who Really Did Kill Jesus? Read the Book. Then you will know...

13 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Short and sweat, August 8, 2006

By	J. Owens - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Passion (Paperback)

This book is a mere 122 pages but it does a good job of covering all the major historical issues surrounding Jesus' passion. However, at times, I wish it went into more detail as Vermes' conclusions are not always persuasive.

8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Searching for Gospel Truth, October 13, 2007

By	Pieter "Toypom" (Johannesburg) - See all my reviews (TOP 50 REVIEWER)

In this fascinating book, Geza Vermes examines the different accounts of the crucifixion in the four Gospels. They are incoherent and contradictory in certain respects. His aim is to find the real history that lurks within. Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are thus subjected to a stringent critical scrutiny in order to define, evaluate and interpret the differences with expert knowledge underpinned by common sense.

The Prologue sets out the key questions, for example the strange change of attitude of the ordinary people towards the Nazarene; they flocked to him to hear his words and to be healed, but during the crucifixion they are portrayed as suddenly hating him. Serious students of the Gospels cannot fail to notice this inexplicable contrast. This is one of the questions examined by Vermes: why the evangelists presented such an extraordinary change in attitude.

He also looks at how the Gospel accounts relate to one another, how they conform to Jewish and Roman reality from non-New Testament sources, and what motivated the various chronicles of the crucifixion. Vermes explores these problems and then attempts to find answers of what really transpired on the day of the crucifixion.

Chapter One: Literary & Historical Preliminaries, includes sections on the sources, Jewish history and legal systems in force in Judea at the time of Jesus: the historical background, the Roman provincial system, the biblical legal system, Jewish law courts according to the Mishna, death penalties, and the temple authorities and Jesus.

In Chapter Two: The Evangelists' Account of the Passion, the author sketches, interprets and queries the way that the evangelists describe the events during the final day of the life of Jesus, from the Last Supper to his death and burial. It includes, to mention a few: the arrest, the interrogation, the night trial, the morning meeting of the Sanhedrin, Pilate, Herod Antipas, the crucifixion, the death and burial.

In Chapter Three: The Passion Accounts Compared With One Another and with Sources from Outside the New Testament, Vermes considers the agreements on seven incidents of the Passion account and the five disagreements. Here is included the content of the 4 Gospel narratives in parallel columns. Then follow comments on (a) the general agreements (b) disagreements between the Synoptics and John (c) some peculiarities in Luke.

Chapter Four: Denouement, provides the findings, including a reconstruction of the sequence of events from the Thursday evening to Friday 14 Nissan or 7th April AD 30 which was the eve of Passover. The Epilogue discusses the leading actors in the Passover narrative: The Jews, Caiaphas, Pilate and Jesus Christ.

As for the Jewish people, the only rational explanation of why the evangelists portrayed them as hostile to Jesus, is the obvious anti-Judaism of the early Gentile Church. Caiaphas is seen as an efficient quisling, Pilate is whitewashed; in reality he was brutal and cruel as is evident from many other sources. It was politically correct to blame the Jewish people and absolve Pilate - I have to agree with Vermes on this point.

I do not agree with the author on his conclusions about some of the Savior's words during the Last Supper and on the cross. Vermes just basically misunderstands the meaning of the vow not to drink wine again until the coming of the Kingdom, and why Jesus exclaimed, "why has Thou forsaken me?", not remembering that the Redeemer had to take all the sins of the world on himself during those last moments before his death. In these matters there is a veil of blindness over Vermes's perception.

The book contains a political map of the Levant at the time of Jesus and a map of the old city of Jerusalem, a bibliography of modern and classical sources, and concludes with an index. This work is highly illuminating and confirms, to my sorrow, the Antisemitism that existed in the Gentile Church from the earliest times. For further information, please consult Our Hands Are Stained with Blood by Michael L Brown and Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism by Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin.

Kabbalah of Yeshua - Zusha Kalet

New Light on the Difficult Words of Jesus - David Bivin

Understanding the Difficult Words of Jesus - David Bivin

Yeshua: A Guide to the Real Jesus and the Original Church - Ron Moseley

Yeshua: The Name of Jesus Revealed in the Old Testament - Yacov Rambsel