Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
448 of 453 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
I bought the Penguin Classics Collection -- Wow!, September 19, 2005
Apparently no reviewer so far has actually bought the complete Penguin Classics Collection. So here's a review from someone who has.
This is an orgy for a book-lover. I have had a wonderful time from the moment I placed the order. They arrived in 25 boxes shrink-wrapped on a wooden pallet, over 750 lbs. of books. It took about twelve hours to unpack them, check them off the packing list (one for each box), and then check them off the list we downloaded from Amazon.com. They take up about 77 linear feet.
I have always loved Penguin books. They are a special publisher, and I would not have considered this sort of purchase from most other publishers. Since I have already read perhaps a quarter of these titles in my life, you can see that I have an affinity for their selections. Penguin books don't just contain the text of the book. They generally include editorial material with biographical, historical, and bibliographical information that is scholarly, well-written, informative, and very useful in adding to the enjoyment and understanding of the book.
Why buy a collection rather than picking the books I want? This is like having books recommended by a good friend who knows what you like to read. Yes, this collection contains books I wouldn't have necessarily thought about picking up and reading. That is one of the real pleasures.
Why buy paperbacks when hardbounds will last longer? Have you have tried to put together a hardbound collection of over 1000 titles like this? It would cost a lot more, for starters. Not all are in print, even classics. If you don't like good quality paperbacks like these, will you settle for a foxed used hardbound copy? I will concede that the print is small. You can get a pair of magnifying reading glasses at any pharmacy for a minor cost. Surely no one is arguing that a classic can only be read in large print versions? I also like books I can carry with me, like these. Well, except for the complete Shakespeare (hardbound), or the Domesday book, or Clarissa, or a few other pretty big volumes.
Lastly, this collection has a particular appeal to me as a former cataloging librarian, which it undoubtedly will not for many people. I love handling books, reading books, and also organizing books. Just the process of taking these out of boxes and putting them randomly on shelves has given me hours of pleasure. Deciding how to organize them will provide more pleasure. Yes, I'm going to catalog my collection. Being able to pluck a book at random from that collection and know that it is almost certain to be worth my time to read is the best treat of all.
|
|
|
62 of 68 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Mea culpa!, October 3, 2005
First, I have a confession to make. I have not read every page of every text of this collection.
There. I said it. I admit it. I'm reviewing something I've not read completely.
That said, I think that few people will be able to honestly admit to having read through all of the 1000+ vlums of the Penguin Classics Library. This is one of those series, like the Britannica's Great Books series, that collections in one format all of the greatest works of literature. I had the Britannica series, and gave it as a gift to a local library; this same library had been given the gift of this Penguin Classics collection, so I was able to thumb through it.
I grew up on Penguin Classic editions. I still have several dozen on my shelves, from classics of English literature (Beowulf, Piers Ploughman, Shakespeare plays, Silas Marner, Tristram Shandy, James Joyce, etc.) to classics of literature from other languages in translation (ancient Greek and Roman texts through to more modern authors in Spanish, French, German, Russian and other language traditions). My first edition of Tacitus was a Penguin Classic; my first version of Plato's Republic was a Penguin Classic. These are wonderful editions.
The one drawback vis-a-vis a series like the Britannica Great Books is that there is no over-arching thematic structure, no reader's guide such as Britannica provides. It is just you with more than thousand titles. On the other hand, the breadth of this collection is incredible, over ten times the titles and material of the Britannica collection. The Penguin Classics Library could provide almost anyone with an entire lifetime of reading.
This brings up another drawback - all of these texts are in paperback; while my Penguin Classics editions are still servicable after 20 to 25 years of use and being on my shelves, they still do age rather more quickly, and are more fragile than hardbacks. These are paperbacks not done as 'pulp fiction' mass markets for the most part, but they aren't the high-quality, acid-free paper variety, either. So, buyer beware.
Still, for those who care enough about books to purchase this collection, they probably know well enough how to treat books kindly and with respect for decades of service. Paperbacks can indeed be lasting, and this collection is one of the most impressive of its kind available.
|
|
|
99 of 117 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Why Penguin Classics Library Collection is not worth the trouble, May 21, 2006
I've long been admirers of Penguin classics' editions. They are one of the very few publishers who tend to publish neglected classics and introduce them to the modern readers. Their book printing and editorial procedures are second to none, and their introductions often enlightening. Therefore, it seems like a no-brainer that I recommend this suite of Penguin Classics Complete Collection.
Well, no...if only for one reason. 1000 books would take you like, 15 to 20 years to read right? Unfortunately by the time you get to the one-quarter of your survey, these poorly produced books would have disintegrated. You heard it, these paperbacks won't last. You would have spent your money for nought.
Paper quality has always been Penguin Classics' Achilles heel. I've often asked them via email why they would not produced their books on acid-free paper for a pound more, which I'm sure bibliophiles would be more than willing to pay (their paperbacks are never cheap in the first place). Their response has always been an eerie silence. My edition of Moby Dick, published by the Penguins, is 6-year-old. To the untrained eye, this book looks like it is pre-owned by Melville. The book has browned so badly that there are times I cannot make out the words, and certain pages are so brittle that I tremble to flip the pages over. Moreover, a disgusting odor taints the air each time I try to read it, making me quite ill. I will have no choice but to dump it despite my love of Melville's classic. The chances of this book making past 20 years is NIL. I would have been happy to have this on acid-free paper that would last for decades, for a couple of pounds more or so. Unfortunately, for all their editorial and academic expertise, Penguin has ardently refused to listen to consumer feedback. Their new line of paperbacks are printed on pulp paper every bit as poor as those printed years ago.
It's sad that one has to compromise. But buying 1000 classics and expecting them to last, I'll reckon 60% of them would be unreadable by the time you come to them. So don't be so foolish to buy Penguin paperbacks if you intend to keep a book. If you don't believe me, go over your old Penguins, or visit a library at look at their Penguin catalogue. Until Penguin or any British paperback publisher has come to their senses, I urge you to spend your hard-earned pennies on American-produced classics. Properly bound (not just glued) and using much more expensive acid-free paper, they are guaranteed to last.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|