Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
35 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Awesome reference, October 2, 2001
By A Customer
This is an extremely exhaustive book and well worth the price. As far as I know, there exists no more comprehensive book on how every muscle interconnects in the human body -- it is truly an encylopedia of the human anatomy.A few things keep me from giving it a 5 star review. 1: Goldfinger's illustrations are fair, but not masterful, particularly those of the human face. 2: Strangely, there are almost no fully rendered full-body illustrations or even any fully rendered "body part" illustrations -- almost all the good sketches are of isolated body parts alone. For example, there isn't any fully rendered muscular illustration that encompasses both the upper arm AND the lower arm(!) There ARE full body illustrations, but only in a more schematical form. 3: There are no "application" illustrations of the anatomy in case studies such as bending, posing, flexing, etc. Most of the examples are in prone positions. Granted, much of this information can be taken from any number of other anatomy books, particularly Richer's "Artistic Anatomy," which this book is largely based on and I also highly recommend. Nevertheless, as a reference guide to the human body, this book has no peer. If you truly want to understand how the muscles of the body interconnect, there is no better alternative. This book is obviously a labour of love.
|
|
|
32 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
the best anatomy reference available, October 27, 2002
this text served me extremely well as i learned figure drawing and is the best anatomical reference i have ever seen, a genuine encyclopedia of anatomy. however, artists should be warned that the approach is analytical (anatomy is broken down into its elements) rather than illustrative (anatomy is presented as pictures of different poses). goldfinger (a sculptor) attempts to explain surface form structurally, from the inside out -- starting with individual bones, then joints, then all visible muscles, facial features (eye, mouth, nose, ear), fat pads, surface veins and arteries, skin folds and finally a gallery of "mass conceptions" of the head, hand and full figure as blocks, continuous planes, cylinders, ovoids and photographed models. (some internal musculature is omitted because it does not affect surface form, but there is extensive information and photo documentation on the facial expression of emotions, largely based on the classic research by ekman and friesen.) this "inside out" approach also determines the content of the 1 to 3 page descriptions of each bone and muscle. in the section on muscles, four diagrams show the skeletal muscle attachments, isolated muscle form, form within surrounding muscles, and surface appearance in lean models, usually from two different points of view. schematic diagrams analyze muscle form into its basic shapes, or show the mechanical effects of muscle contraction. the text is often heavy going but presents unusually detailed and clear explanations of muscle attachments, action, form and interaction with other muscles or joints. there is also much information not available anywhere else, and all sex differences in anatomy (for example in the abdominal musculature and hip bones) are described in the text. goldfinger's goal is to provide the artist with the information necessary to identify the bones and muscles contributing to surface form in any model, any physique or any pose, and i have never found it to fail that purpose. for a breezier and visually more attractive approach, simblet's book is preferable.
|
|
|
71 of 83 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Too many parts, not enough bodies, November 7, 2000
Detailed -- and disappointing. There are too many written descriptions, too many line drawings, too much wasted space (large margins, half-blank pages) and not enough photographs. The first photograph appears on page 65. Prior to that, over half the pages are primarily, or entirely, text. A randomly selected passage (p. 37): "The tibial platform is divided into medial and lateral condyles. Their top surfaces have elongated shallow facets. These facets articulate with the medial and lateral condyles of the femur..." Much of the text throughout the entire book is of this type.Other minuses include the paucity of body positions, and the dearth of ethnicities and body types. Although the body PARTS are seen from the front, back, and side, there are no bodies DOING anything. There are no old people, no children, no fat people, no thin people, and except for one light-skinned black man, no people of races other than Caucasian. There is very little depiction of male and female differences, although there is some descriptive text of them. While the book description says it includes genitalia, there is extremely little of it -- hardly enough to mention. There is one photo of a circumcised penis from the front, and one from the side; and the same of an uncircumcised one. There are two frontal views of the "female pubic region", one shaved and one unshaved, both with legs tightly together. All of these photos are on one page, and that is the extent of the "genitalia", unless you want to include the page with female breasts. This page has four photos: female breasts from the the front, in 3/4 profile, and from overhead, and one male nipple. Oh yes -- genitalia is also included in the two pages (only two!) of full body photographs. These two pages contain eight photos, four male and four female. Each sex is seen from the front, back, 3/4 front profile and 3/4 back profile. (These same views are given of a male head, but there are no corresponding photos of a female head.) The book goes through the body part by part, the usual format being one page of illustrations facing a page with corresponding descriptive text. The illustrations usually include a drawing of the underlying skeletal structure of the body part under investigation, and next to it two more drawings, one of which adds just one muscle, while the other adds the entire muscle group; finally there is a photograph of the part. The photographs are rather small, often less than an inch and a half wide. (Many of the margins are two and a half inches wide.) One plus is the 39 pages devoted to facial expressions, although, again, more than half of these pages are text-only (again with large margins and lots of blank space), and even the pages of illustration contain only one or two expressions per page, usually a front and a side view of the same expression, in the usual format of skeleton + muscle drawings + photograph. This is not really a bad book, just not worth the money. I wouldn't have bought it if I had examined it first. A better choice for the working artist (especially if s/he is anywhere near the "starving" category) would be Stephan Rogers Peck's "Atlas of Human Anatomy for the Artist". Peck's book ... has much of the same information as the ... Goldfinger book, and includes many useful features not found in the more expensive book. Check out the reader reviews on it!
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|