Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Vital to understanding the eugenics movement, December 4, 2004
Christine Rosen has addressed an important and before now neglected area of the study of eugenics--the role churches played in both its propagation and eventual destruction. For any student of the eugenics movement, or of American Christian history, this book is vital. It is very comprehensive and, given the excellent citations and bibliography, one of the most well researched books I have seen recently in any subject.
|
|
|
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Marvelous History, December 9, 2005
This book is marvelous because it does what all good history does, it gives us a true-to-life feel for what the eugenics movement was like in its heyday roughly a century ago. This isn't a dry-as-dust recital of facts or an axe-to-grind ideological spin. It's an honest and balanced look at the mostly liberal Protestant clergy who helped lend 'mainstream' legitimacy to the movement much as their counterparts in the late 1960s to early 1970s lent an air of legitimacy to abortion legalization.
Just keep in mind that these clergymen were the "choir" for what was for a time advanced as a modern and more scientific replacement historic Christianity. Those who occupied the pulpit were well-respected scientists such as Henry Goddard with his influential The Kallikak Family, then-popular writers such as Lothrop Stoddard, author of The Revolt Against Civilization, and activists such as Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, author of The Pivot of Civilization. At the other end of the religious spectrum were the religious conservatives--fundamentalist, mainstream Protestant, and Catholic--who were the chief opponents to eugenics, particularly the movement's attempts to legalize forced sterilization. It really is a lot like today's abortion debate.
Also keep in mind that liberal Protestant clergy were not the first to be drawn to the idea of breeding a better humanity. It began during the 1840s and 1850s with some utopia free love cults in the U.S., such as the Oneida Community. Margaret Sanger noted that in her second autobiography. They were the first to separate sex from reproduction. You could have sex with anyone in the community, but the community would dictate which of those couplings would produce offspring. Their ideas were not rooted in Darwinian evolution like the later eugenics. They simply applied common, barnyard breeding techniques to people.
Led by Victoria Woodhull, those ideas were taken up by some in the Spiritualism movement of the 1870s. And it was Woodhull who first 'mainstreamed' eugenics giving many speeches on the topic across the U.S. and the U.K. almost three decades before the usually cited founder of eugenics, Francis Galton, took up the cause in earnest after 1900. You might even say that Woodhull retired from promoting eugenics about the time that the movement's alleged founder, Galton, seriously took up the cause.
Woodhull's early ideas about eugenics were a strange blend of the sexual mysticism she used to justify her radical free love ideas and conventional folk ideas about prenatal influences. I explore those in Free Lover: Sex, Marriage and Eugenics in the Early Speeches of Victoria Woodhull. She later dropped her free love agenda, married a wealthy English banker, and concentrated on promoting a more scientific form of eugenics that's explored in Lady Eugenist: Feminist Eugenics in the Speeches and Writings of Victoria Woodhull.
The great strength of Rosen's books is that it gives you a peek inside the minds and hearts of the American religious suppoters of eugenics. And its very greatness points out that no one has done a comparable job with the more scientific supporters of eugenics, who typically come off as cardboard figures, or movement activists such as Margaret Sanger, who is often turned (inaccurately) into a secular saint of women's rights. And the greatest need in the literature is for an in-depth look at those who, like G. K. Chesterton, opposed eugenics with their whole hearts. Perhaps Christine Rosen will find the time to take up at least one of those much-needed tasks.
|
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thorough, Well Written but..., March 7, 2008
This is a thorough, well-documented and engaging book on a subject that has been swept under the rug of American history and should be better understood and examined. The author does a brilliant job of bringing it to light.
The relation between science, religion and morality is extremely important and the eugenics movement, which sprang up almost in concert with Darwin's Descent of Man, (the founder of eugenics was Darwin's cousin, in fact) represents just how wrong they can all go. The book makes the point that if the Depression had not happened, forced sterilization of the "degenerate" may be accepted practice to this day, as it was by the late 1920s.
A few points, though.
First, I have no idea why the previous reviewer, Perry, repeatedly mentions Victoria Woodhull, since she nowhere appears in this book.
One flaw that I found disappointing is the complete absence of any discussion of race in this book. Only by outside reading have I been able to confirm that eugenics was at its core thoroughly racist.
Another is that the only clergy mentioned are of a liberal bent -there is little sense of how eugenics was received by more mainstream or conservative Christians. Unlike what the previous reviewer reports, there is no point in this book at which the eugenic debate is portrayed as like today's abortion/anti-abortion movement -the supporters seem all to be liberal and educated, and only one mention is made of fundamentalist opposition -and that was in opposition to compulsory sterilization, not to the essentially racist and classist nature of eugenics.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|