AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors (Hardcover)

~ JAMA & Archives Journals (Author)
Key Phrases: mouse gene symbols, preferred citation format, affiliation footnote, New York, United States, Accessed April (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Essential tool for physicians and other health professionals. In addition to the basics of grammar and citation, it leads writers through the thickets of abbreviation, nomenclature, and quantitation."--Booklist

"For medical writers and editors, the AMA Manual of Style remains the unrivaled point of departure."--Copyediting

"The 10th edition instructs writers how to attach audio and video clips, as well as links to Web-based supplementary material. It also instructs them how to reference research that, in addition to books pulled from the library stacks, might include Web sites, messages from e-mail lists, or online-conference proceedings...The new Oxford University Press verison also has an expanded, 175-page chapter on ethical and legal concerns, including conflict of interest, scientific misconduct, intellectual-property rights, and protection of research subjects' rights in scientific research and publication."--Chronicle of Higher Education

"The 10th edition instructs writers how to attach audio and video clips, as well as links to Web-based supplementary material. It also instructs them how to reference research that, in addition to books pulled from the library stacks, might include Web sites, messages from e-mail lists, or online-conference proceedings...The new Oxford University Press version also has an expanded, 175-page chapter on ethical and legal concerns, including conflict of interest, scientific misconduct, intellectual-property rights, and protection of research subjects' rights in scientific research and publication."--Chronicle of Higher Education

"The manual is comprehensive and detailed, and I can't think of a single relevant aspect of medical and scientific writing that is not covered here."--Doody's, a 5 star review

"The manual is thorough and authoritative...the content is carefully referenced, and the references on all topics are impressively up-to-date."--The Journal of the European Medical Writers Association

"The manual's expository style is exemplary. It is relaxed and unpretentious...The manual covers impressive new territory."--The Editorial Eye

"This excellent manual offers the means to produce essays, articles or research papers that are well organized and authoritative."--Nursing Standard


"The 10th edition instructs writers how to attach audio and video clips, as well as links to Web-based supplementary material. It also instructs them how to reference research that, in addition to books pulled from the library stacks, might include Web sites, messages from e-mail lists, or online-conference proceedings...The new Oxford University Press version also has an expanded, 175-page chapter on ethical and legal concerns, including conflict of interest, scientific misconduct, intellectual-property rights, and protection of research subjects' rights in scientific research and publication."--Chronicle of Higher Education
"Essential tool for physicians and other health professionals. In addition to the basics of grammar and citation, it leads writers through the thickets of abbreviation, nomenclature, and quantitation."--Booklist
"The manual is comprehensive and detailed, and I can't think of a single relevant aspect of medical and scientific writing that is not covered here."--Doody's, a 5 star review
"For medical writers and editors, the AMA Manual of Style remains the unrivaled point of departure."--Copyediting
"The manual is thorough and authoritative...the content is carefully referenced, and the references on all topics are impressively up-to-date."--Review from The Journal of the European Medical Writers Association
"This excellent manual offers the means to produce essays, articles or research papers that are well organized and authoritative."--Nursing Standard
"The manual's expository style is exemplary. It is relaxed and unpretentious...The manual covers impressive new territory."--The Editorial Eye

Product Description

For decades indispensable, the AMA Manual of Style continues to provide editorial support to the medical and scientific publishing community. Since the 1998 publication of the 9th edition, however, the world of medical publishing has rapidly modernized, and the intersection of research and publishing has become ever more complex. The 10th edition of the AMA Manual of Style, published in early 2007, brings this definitive manual into the 21st century with a broadened international perspective.

In doing so, the 10th edition has expanded its electronic guidelines, with the understanding that authors now routinely submit articles through online systems and often cite Web-only content. Ethical and legal issues receive increased attention, with detailed guidelines on authorship, conflicts of interest, scientific misconduct, intellectual property, and the protection of individuals' rights in scientific research and publication. The new edition examines research ethics and editorial independence and features new material on indexing and searching as well as medical nomenclature.

JAMA and the Archives Journals, one of the most respected groups of medical publications in the world, have lent members of their expert staff of professional journal editors to the committee that has produced this edition. Extensively peer-reviewed, the 10th edition provides a welcome and improved standard for the growing international medical community. More than a style manual, this 10th edition offers invaluable guidance on how to navigate the dilemmas that authors and researchers and their institutions, medical editors and publishers, and members of the news media who cover scientific research confront in a society that has thrust these issues center stage. ALso available in an online version!

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 1032 pages
• Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA; 10 edition (March 15, 2007)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0195176332
• ISBN-13: 978-0195176339
• Product Dimensions: 10.1 x 7.2 x 2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 4.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #8,573 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #2 in	Books > Reference > Writing > Nonfiction
  #16 in	Books > Professional & Technical > Medical > Research
  #24 in	Books > Science > Medicine > Research

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

41 of 41 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars At long last, the go-to guide for medical writers and editors is revised, April 16, 2007

By	K. Hinton "avid reader" (Atlanta, GA) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (VINE VOICE)

At long last, the 10th Edition of the AMA Manual of Style is finally available, and I am happy to say it was worth the wait. As an editor who has worked in medical journals, scientific Web sites, and an agency specializing in pharmaceutical advertising, I found the 9th edition to be, at times, a bit dated and not as easy to navigate as I would have hoped. Most of those problems have been resolved in the 10th edition, as well as the inclusion of some new information that I didn't even know I was missing until I found.

The following is a list of changes in the new edition of the style guide that I found particularly helpful and relevant, and will hopefully be a quick go-to guide when you're debating whether to buy the new version or hold fast to the 9th edition.

- The section on Correct and Preferred Usage has moved from Chapter 9 to Chapter 11 and includes a wealth of information that was not in the previous edition. There is more information about the difference between race and ethnicity and when it's relevant to include sexual orientation in a scientific manuscript.

- An extended section on electronic references (3.15, 63-72). This new info is highly relevant considering since 1998 (when the 9th edition was released) there have been a number of innovations with the Internet and a number of authors choose to use the Web as sources of information.

- The section on manuscript preparation is vastly improved and expanded (Ch 4). It includes more information on the different types of tables and figures as well as new guidelines for the use of symbols and footnotes.

- Of particular interest to journal editors, there is more information on authorship requirements, conflicts of interest, sources of funding, and copyright and permissions basics (Ch 5).

- The section on capitalization demonstrates that, not only can the AMA editors laugh at themselves, but that they're also familiar with the lyrics of Coolio (eg, There is no party like a West Coast party because a West Coast party doesn't stop. 10.3, 375). The section on capitalization also includes newer terms like iBook and eBay that are more relevant to modern writing (10.8, 380).

- In terms of grammar, some of the rules that always give editors trouble are more explicitly outlined and in more detail. There's a longer section on the use of that and which (7.2, 318), which I still have to look up occasionally. A final ruling on the health care vs healthcare debate (always 2 words, per AMA, 11.1, 395). And more specific rules on false/parenthetical plurals and sentences with compound subjects (7.8)

- A change in the use of states in references. All will use postal codes now, instead of the former abbreviations (14.5, 451-455).

- An expanded section on international currency (18.5.12, 817-819).

- The section on terminology has been expanded to include information about different specialties, including psychiatry, ophthalmology, and obstetrics (Ch 15). This section also includes a new chart with human viruses that is expanded and easier to navigate (15.14.3, 762-767).

- There is a more comprehensive copyediting section, including information on editing numerical information (21.1, 907; 23.1, 929-933).

- And finally, and most importantly for all newer medical editors and writing, there is a more informative resources guide with professional organizations aimed at scientific writers and editors as well as grammar and editing resources (25, 967-976).

As a whole, I'm very pleased with the new edition of the AMA style guide, and can't wait to incorporate the new changes into my own work.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Curmudgeon's Delight, September 9, 2008

By	Dr Abel Scribe PhD "Doc Scribe" (Boulder, CO USA) - See all my reviews

Style manuals are written either for editors or for authors, rarely for both. The AMA manual is a text only editors could love, it serves the interests of authors mostly as an afterthought. The "Instructions for Authors" on JAMA's website presents the essential requirements of the style in a more concise format for journal articles, the vehicles of research reporting. This is also two texts in one, a text on style and a text on medical terminology and ethics, a dubious combination. Style, by its very nature, is well served by a ten-year publication cycle. It should change only very slowly. Medical terminology, on the other hand, is in a constant state of flux. Authors working in a field are well aware of the accepted nomenclature without the need to be reminded by an inevitably dated style manual. This text is written for editors at some remove from medical practice and research. This review, on the other hand, is from an author's point of view.

The last edition of the AMA manual (1997) sought to impose the metric system on clinical measures. This initiative failed. It was simply ignored in preference to the conventional measures used in clinical practice. The new AMA style requires a conventional measure to be followed by a metric conversion factor. For example, the new AMA manual is a heavy tome, the one-thousand-plus page text weighs 4.2 pounds (to convert to kilograms multiply by 0.45). This is a sensible and useful requirement. However, you need not buy the manual to get the exhaustive conversion table, it's available on the JAMA website.

The new manual also accepts the "versioning" of online documents as research references. In effect, an online clinical or research report can be changed once published, without the change being documented, and still be considered a credible reference. I find this practice wholly unacceptable, and I'm a mere anthropologist, not an MD. Corrections, retractions, revisions, errata, and so forth to print articles are documented in print. The same standard must apply to electronic documents. Those who argue that the practice of medicine is more an art or craft than a science may be right, but it is not a whimsical craft.

The text is a curmudgeon's delight. For example, the table of contents lists a section on "Measurement and Quantitation." Do they mean to say "quantification," not "quantitation?" Alas, my dictionary has no such word. Abbreviations are used for the names of journals when composing references to articles. On at least three instances, the AMA manual refers readers to different sources where the standard abbreviations can be found. None get it right. The standard reference used to be the "Index Medicus" published by the National Library of Medicine. The name has changed to the "List of Journals Index by Medline" and it is available free online.

If you are sufficiently knowledgable to write authoritatively on a subject, then you are familiar with how the research community talks about it, and they have litttle regard for style guides. For example, a highly lethal virus was first identified in the American Southwest in the early 1990s. A new virus is typically named for the locale where it is discovered. This was a problem for this new hantvirus strain. It was found in the Canyon del Muerto in northeast Arizona, so named for a massacre in the 1800s. Imagine the public reaction to a new, lethal, "Canyon of Death" virus loose in their neighborhood. Thought turned to naming it the "Four Corners" virus, but the local Chamber of Commerce muttered something about tarring and feathering those responsible. It was finally christened the "sin nombre virus," Spanish for "no name." This should have been written lowercase since "sin nombre" is not a proper noun, just a phrase. But the literature soon came to capitalize it as if it were a place name, the Sin Nombre Virus (SNV). The story continues. When in the process of publishing a review paper on the hantavirus my editor changed the capitalization to lowercase in the galley proofs. This was absolutely correct according to the style guides. I sent her portions of six articles from research journals to illustrate the practice of capitalization that had taken hold in the literature. To lowercase the virus name would have been stylistically correct, but it would have discredited the paper, suggesting the author was not in touch with the literature. It was capitalized in the published article. The moral? Use style guides warily when it comes to nomenclature.

The AMA's lead editor makes this charming observation in her preface: "I never cease to be amazed by the general inability of physicians, other health professionals, and scientists to communicate through the written word. Their scholarly and creative ideas and insightful data interpretation of them seem to get lost in the translation from brain to page" (p. v). The quality of medical writing has dramatically improved since a young Dr. Michael Crichton (Jurassic Park, tv's ER) wrote in the pages of the New England Journal that "medical writing is bad, but its functions are perfectly understandable as a display of scientific [editorial?] profundity, not as an attempt to communicate experience" (December 11, 1975;293:1257-1259). Apparently this malaise, and foot-in-mouth disease to boot, now afflicts the AMA's editors.

Curmudgeoning aside, is the 1000-page text usable? AMA style generally dispenses with periods after abbreviations, but if the abbreviation for "saint" is used in a name, as in William St. James, a period is required. If the abbreviation is used with a city in a reference, as in St Louis, no period is needed. Is this the answer to a question you would ever think to ask? What other pitfalls and traps lurk in this massive text? Instructions for the general use of abbreviations are found near pages 450 and 500; those for the use of colons are on pages 34 and 241; and those for numbers are on pages 795 or 850. The text may be well organized for editors, but if you are looking for guidance on the most common problems confronted by a writer, you have a monumental task before you. While there is some useful information for authors in the first 60-80 pages, especially on references, this a tedious volume to work through. It is a reference, not a guide. A reference demands that you know what questions to ask. A guide answers the questions you didn't think to ask. As an author, I need a style guide.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars AMA manual, March 1, 2009

By	Janine F. Reinholtz "neenbean" (IIlinois) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This manual is essential if you are writing your thesis or dissertation in AMA style. There is no source online that compares. I recommend to just suck it up- buy it for 40$ and quit worrying if your advisory board is going to be disappointed in the quality of your written manuscript.