Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Hardcover)

~ Giovanna Borradori (Author), Jurgen Habermas (Author), Jacques Derrida (Author) "B O R R A D O R I : Do you consider what we now tend to call "September 11" an unprecedented event, one..." (more)
Key Phrases: first historic world event, autoimmune crisis, new cosmopolitan order, United States, Cold War, Berlin Wall (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

The idea for Philosophy in a Time of Terror was born hours after the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and came to realization just weeks later when Giovanna Borradori sat down with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, in separate interviews, in New York City. Habermas and Derrida evaluated the significance of the most destructive terrorist attack ever perpetrated. The resulting book is an unprecedented encounter between two of the most influential thinkers of our age: here for the first time Habermas and Derrida overcome their antagonism and agree to appear side by side in this book.

In her introduction, Borradori contends that philosophy has an invaluable contribution to make to the understanding of terrorism. Just as the traumas produced by colonialism, totalitarianism, and the Holocaust wrote the history of the twentieth century, the history of the twenty-first century is already signed by global terrorism. Each dialogue, accompanied by a critical essay, recognizes the magnitude of this upcoming challenge. Characteristically, Habermas's dialogue is dense, compact, and elegantly traditional. Derrida's, on the other hand, takes the reader on a long, winding, and unpredictable road. Yet unexpected agreements emerge between them: both have a deep suspicion of the concept of "terrorism" and see the need for a transition from classical international law, premised on the model of nation-states, to a new cosmopolitan order based on continental alliances.

As Derrida and Habermas disassemble and reassemble what we think we know about terrorism, they break from the familiar social and political rhetoric increasingly polarized between good and evil. In this process, we watch two of the greatest philosophical minds at work.

From the Inside Flap

The idea for Philosophy in a Time of Terror was born hours after the attacks on 9/11 and was realized just weeks later when Giovanna Borradori sat down with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida in New York City, in separate interviews, to evaluate the significance of the most destructive terrorist act ever perpetrated. This book marks an unprecedented encounter between two of the most influential thinkers of our age as here, for the first time, Habermas and Derrida overcome their mutual antagonism and agree to appear side by side. As the two philosophers disassemble and reassemble what we think we know about terrorism, they break from the familiar social and political rhetoric increasingly polarized between good and evil. In this process, we watch two of the greatest intellects of the century at work.

See all Editorial Reviews

---

Product Details Hardcover: 200 pages Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; 1 edition (June 15, 2003) Language: English ISBN-10: 0226066649 ISBN-13: 978-0226066646 Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 7.1 x 0.7 inches Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews) Amazon.com Sales Rank: #150,086 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books) Popular in this category: (What's this?) #79 in  Books > Nonfiction > Current Events > September 11

---

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Jurgen Habermans Page

Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
B O R R A D O R I : Do you consider what we now tend to call "September 11" an unprecedented event, one that radically alters the way we see ourselves? Read the first page

Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
first historic world event, autoimmune crisis, new cosmopolitan order, conditional hospitality, unauthorized force, classical international law, world citizenry, unconditional forgiveness

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
United States, Cold War, Berlin Wall, Saudi Arabia, Arab Muslim, New York, Security Council, Critical Theory, Jacques Derrida, Twin Towers, World Trade Center, Carl Schmitt, Critical Theorists, French Revolution, Limits of Reason Alone, Soviet Union

New!
Concordance | Text Stats

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Citations (learn more)

This book cites 86 books:

• Perpetual Peace, and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Morals (HPC Classics Series) by Immanuel Kant on 5 pages
• The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity by Jurgen Habermas on 4 pages
• Philosophical Dictionary (Penguin Classics) by Francois Voltaire on page 125, page 126, and Back Matter
• Critical Theory (Critical Theory Ppr) by Max Horkheimer on page 69, Back Matter (1), and Back Matter (2)
• Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant in Front Matter, Back Matter (1), and Back Matter (2)

See all 86 books this book cites

 

32 books cite this book:

• Human Rights in the 'War on Terror' by Richard Ashby Wilson on page 225, and page 240
• The Divided West by Jürgen Habermas in Front Matter, and Back Matter
• Landscapes of the Jihad: Militancy, Morality, Modernity by Faisal Devji in Back Matter (1), and Back Matter (2)
• Life in the Wires: The CTheory Reader by Arthur Kroker on page 162, and page 164
• The Divided West by Jürgen Habermas in Front Matter, and Back Matter

See all 32 books citing this book

---

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	91% buy the item featured on this page: Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida 3.4 out of 5 stars (15)
	5% buy History of Political Philosophy 4.7 out of 5 stars (15) $19.36
	2% buy The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism 4.2 out of 5 stars (414) $10.88
	1% buy The Divided West 4.7 out of 5 stars (3) $16.96

Explore similar items

---

Suggested Tags from Similar Products  (What's this?) Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product). Check a corresponding box or enter your own tags in the field below.  philosophy(14) deconstruction(8) political philosophy(6) violence(4) politics(3) communication theory(3) political science(3) social theory(3) critical theory(2) 20th century(2) Your tags: Add your first tag

Search Products Tagged with   See most popular tags

---

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

---

 

Customer Reviews

15 Reviews 5 star:  (6) 4 star:  (3) 3 star:  (1) 2 star:  (1) 1 star:  (4)           Average Customer Review 3.4 out of 5 stars (15 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews 50 of 57 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Borradori's Bridging of Philosophical Traditions, June 5, 2003 By  Michael Weintraub (Livingston, NJ USA) - See all my reviews Giovanna Borradori's most recent project is a groundbreaking endeavor to forge a new understanding of terrorism in the post-9/11 age. Her searching questions draw both Habermas and Derrida from their traditionally diametrically opposed philosophical quarters, highlighting their surprisingly similar stances on what they perceive to be the necessary move toward a quasi-Kantian cosmopolitan international law. Moreover, we find in both of these dialogues and Borradori's supplements a reliance upon a few key figures (Kant, Schmitt, and Arendt for example), suggesting that the philosophical traditions with which each figure identifies-Critical Theory for Habermas and Deconstruction for Derrida-are perhaps not as mutually exclusive or sharply demarcated as we might have previously thought. The structure of the book, dialogue followed by interpretive essay, helps ground the extemporaneous reflections on terrorism in Habermas' and Derrida's broader philosophical work. Habermas here seems much less conservative than in his other works, though his focus in a sense remains on the possibility of communication and understanding in light of the growing threat of terrorist attacks and current US policy. Derrida acts as our guide on a deconstructive journey, marking important moments and movements such as autoimmunity, always hyper-aware of the context (the end of the Cold War) in which 9/11 and the "war on terrorism" have been played out. To be sure, these dialogues also underscore these philosophers' different understandings, particularly in their responses to Borradori's question of 9/11 as an "event," as well as the proper approach to the United States' "war on terror". Borradori's ability to fuse topics of terror, the United States' "crusade" against an unknown, unseen, and ever-present enemy, with issues of hospitality and tolerance makes possible a broader discussion than one might imagine. Further, her probing intellect and ability to guide conversation without imposing upon her subjects a pre-determined philosophical agenda make these dialogues remarkably readable and successful; undoubtedly this work has opened up a space for evaluating the possible and necessary contributions that philosophy can make in both critically evaluating and politically altering the course of human events. 8 of 9 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars A good overview of two great minds at work..., January 17, 2004 By  Giovanni Mantilla (Bogota, Colombia) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)    This book succeeds in two respects. First, both interviews are significant in that they address the subject matter in an analytically rigorous manner, enticing the reader to think-which is by no means a disposable end, in an era of CNN-inspired "analysis"-. The interview with Derrida is particularly enlightening, actually *forcing* you to think "otherwise", to quote another brilliant mind, Foucault. Second, Borradori accomplishes the difficult task of putting in place the reflexions of both philosophers in the context of their own philosophical work, tackling the most important issues relevant to their "way of problematizing", their views on reason, modernity, history, the international context, war & conflict, violence, etc. This book, of course, does not suffice as a Habermas/Derrida "reader", but it certainly works as a practical exercise in trying to think about the present in ways and words that are not commonplace. Whether you actually agree with Habermas or Derrida is unimportant, what's important is that you have at least given the issue some thought. I think this book is a small, yet thoroughly enjoyable and worthwile addition to anyone's collection, be it an intellectual or a regular person. 5 of 5 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Postmodern situations, postmodern ideas, May 24, 2006 By  FrKurt Messick "FrKurt Messick" (Bloomington, IN USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 10 REVIEWER)       Amazon Verified Purchase This review is from: Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Paperback) As Borradori states in his introduction, 'Both [Habermas and Derrida] hold that terrorism is an elusive concept that exposes the global political arena to imminent dangers as well as future challenges.' I think that this sums up what many people feel about the war on terrorism - unlike conflicts such as World War I and World War II, or even the more vaguely defined Cold War or Vietnam war, this is a war where there the front-line can be anywhere and nowhere, where the enemies can be anyone and no one, and where the tactics, strategies, motives and hoped-for achievables are so far removed from what traditional political and military methodology deals with that it requires a paradigm shift in our thinking. 'While the Cold War was characterized by the possibility of balance between two superpowers, it is impossible to build a balance with terrorism because the threat does not come from a state but from incalculable forces and incalculable responsibilities.' As is typical of Derrida, he sees the relationship between terrorism and communication to be paramount. (I was first exposed to Derrida in theology classes, dealing with the postmodern predicament of looking for meaning in language and behind language in ways that make sense). It is perhaps ironic that the term that springs to mind most when contemplating Derrida is 'deconstruction', which is, in often a dramatically literal sense, what terrorism also hopes to achieve. 'The intellectual grounding of Derrida's deconstruction owes much to the nineteenth- and twentieth-century lineage constituted by Nietzsche, Heidegger and Freud. For Derrida, many of the principles to which the Western tradition has attributed universal validity do not capture what we all share or even hope for.' This becomes all the more problematic when dealing with those outside the Western tradition, such as occurred in Vietnam, Korea, and now in the war on terror. For Derrida, communication is not simply political. 'Derrida engaged the themes of terror as a psychological and metaphysical state as well as terrorism as a political category.' This draws upon philosophical ideas that can reinterpret the events in various ways, as plays out in various media outlets even to this day. But the events of 9/11 for Derrida are not surprising. 'Was 9/11 truly unpredictable? Not for Derrida. ... The kind of attack that the terrorists launched in 2001 had already been prefigured in detail by the technocinematic culture of our days.' Habermas also sees communication as a critical element. One issue for Habermas is the speed of modern mass communication - it 'works in the interest of those who select and distribute the information rather than those who receive it. Habermas suggests that the pressure of thinking and evaluating data quickly has a political import, because it facilitates an experience of politics based on the persona of the actors rather than the ideas that each of them defends.' Habermas' theory of communicative action, including its idea of violence as distorted communication, shows the importance of perception, understanding, critical analysis and response. 'Habermas understands modernity to be a change in belief attitude rather than a coherent body of beliefs. A belief attitude indicates the way in which we believe rather than what we believe in. Thus, fundamentalism has less to do with any specific text or religious dogma and more to do with the modality of belief.' This fits in many ways when one commentator I read recently who discussed the overall state of Muslim theology, expressing the understanding that the Muslims have never gone through a period of Reformation as Christendom did, nor have Muslims come to embrace the idea of a society and nation-state separate from religious. Indeed, we can hear echoes of this latter idea in political speech in America, often from groups that can be described as (and often embrace the term) fundamentalist. This will continue to be an issue in the war on terror. Another issue for Habermas will be the issue of nation-state vs. international organisation power. 'Habermas is convinced that what separates the present moment from a full transition to cosmopolitanism is not only a theoretical matter but a practical one, too, for the decisions of the international community need to be respected. ... Unfortunately, the power differential between national and international authorities threatens to weaken the legitimacy of any military intervention and to retool police action as war.' This has been true not just in the twentieth century, but previously as well. The Congress of Vienna, the League of Nations, and the United Nations have all failed to have power to counter the superpowers of their times; alliances such as NATO and the Warsaw Pact relied heavily on one particular partner. For both Derrida and Habermas, the war on terror is not as simple as Arab vs. West, Muslim against Christian/post-Christian society, or particular nations against one another. Perhaps had this been written after the recent situation with the Dubai acquisition of American ports being stopped, they would have pointed out that once again, our definitions and communicative premises fail - how does one balance the idea that foreign ownership of ports is unwise with the fact that few are concerned when British, Canadian, Australian or Norwegian firms do the same? There is a lack of definition about it all, even when all the words we use, to bring about clarity. The war on terror might be the quintessential post-modern situation.		Most Recent Customer Reviews 5.0 out of 5 stars Good book And the only blathering on that I see in evidence is what commentary the book has spawned, both here and elsewhere. Published 13 months ago by Quebec1000 5.0 out of 5 stars Great, thought-provoking It's a privilege to hear what these two minds have to say about our times, especially because their styles of thinking and the way they articulate today's problems are so... Read more Published on September 6, 2005 by Elzbieta Bittencourt 4.0 out of 5 stars A most noble endeavour Although the section dedicated to Habermas is brief and Derrida is allowed to make a more dynamic impact, Borradori knows very well what she is doing, and ensures that the end... Read more Published on March 25, 2004 by Drexler 3.0 out of 5 stars A Philosophy left on the table.... The main issues I have with this book are: 1. the dialogue with Habermas is way too short. I don't know if he was on a time line, but, it is just as he is gathering a full head... Read more Published on March 22, 2004 by o dubhthaigh 4.0 out of 5 stars But Read Truth and Justification Amazon has really hyped this one for folks with my categories of interest and as a dialogue with supporting essays I found the relative closeness I felt with Habermas and Derrida... Read more Published on February 9, 2004 by W. Jamison 2.0 out of 5 stars Lack of Critical Distinction Let's begin with the following from Derrida: "And does terrorism have to work only through death? Can't one terrorize without killing? Read more Published on January 14, 2004 by Inn Book Store 1.0 out of 5 stars Beware Habermass neo-Kantianism Habermas's neo-Kantianism is just transnational progressivism dressed up as philosophy: the NGOs should be the focus, not nation states; terrorism is a crime that should be... Read more Published on November 11, 2003 1.0 out of 5 stars Dangerous - Zero Stars In terms of Western culture, most of the 20th century was a downward arc of nihilism, despair and emptiness. Read more Published on September 25, 2003 5.0 out of 5 stars Philosophy I love your book and I admire you. I am 15. One day I dream I can be like you. One question, Did Derrida know about Habermas's interview before he was being interviewed? Read more Published on August 19, 2003 1.0 out of 5 stars Not the book to read to understand terrorism Although deconstructionist thought has been one of the most powerful modalitites of reading modernist literary texts--- this doesn't mean that it can be translated into an... Read more Published on August 18, 2003 by Daniel M. Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews

---

Customer Discussions

This product's forum Discussion Replies Latest Post No discussions yet Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight Start a new discussion Topic: First post: Receive e-mail when new posts are made Prompts for sign-in   Guidelines Active discussions in related forums Discussion Replies Latest Post history Human Biodiversity, history and modernity: Murray, Sailer, Derbyshire. 532 4 minutes ago politics CNN non-news 62 7 minutes ago politics Americas Worst Problem is?? 516 10 minutes ago history Why does Holocaust Fabrication Exist? 264 55 minutes ago textbook Anyone need psychology testbook- trying to sell a used copy 2 1 day ago textbook textbook scam 72 1 day ago current events The Blood of Tyrants 0 3 days ago Search Customer Discussions Search all Amazon discussions

The Current Events community Latest activity 3 days ago 703 customers have contributed 441 products, 21 discussions and more... › Explore the community The History community Latest activity 1 hour ago 22,037 customers have contributed 29,050 products, 808 discussions and more... › Explore the community Related forums current events (21 discussions) history (808 discussions) politics (1023 discussions) textbook (19 discussions) textbooks... Explore more › See all Customer Communities › Your communities

---

Listmania!

Philosophy, Knowledge, and Reason: A list by Didaskalex "Eusebius Alexandrinus"   Summer 2003: A list by cnystudent   Essential Philosophical Texts: A list by Philosopher9 "iconclast_666" Create a Listmania! list

Search Listmania!

---

So You'd Like to...

Create a guide

Search Guides

---

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Be the first person to add an article about this item at Amapedia.com.

› See featured Amapedia.com articles

---

Look for Similar Items by Category

• Books > History
• Books > Nonfiction > Current Events > September 11
• Books > Nonfiction > Current Events > Terrorism
• Books > Nonfiction > Philosophy > Modern
• Books > Nonfiction > Politics

---

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:
Western philosophy, from c 1900 -
Political science - Philosophy
Political science - Philosophy.
September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001.
Terrorism - Philosophy
Terrorism - Philosophy.
Philosophy
Politics / Current Events
General
History / General
Philosophy / General
Political Freedom & Security - Terrorism
Political Science / General
Political Science / Political Freedom & Security / Terrorism
Derrida, Jacques
Interviews
History & Surveys - Modern
Habermas, Jurgen
Political science
September 11 Terrorist Attacks
September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001
Terrorism


i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

 

Feedback If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide? Your comments can help make our site better for everyone. Please note that we are unable to respond directly to all feedback submitted via this form, but we'll ask you to sign in so we can contact you if needed.

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

› View and edit your browsing history

Get to Know Us Careers Investor Relations Press Releases Amazon and Our Planet Make Money with Us Sell on Amazon Join Associates Self-publish with Us › See all Let Us Help You Shipping Rates & Policies Amazon Prime Returns Help

Canada | China | France | Germany | Japan | United Kingdom  And don't forget: Amazon Windowshop | AmazonWireless | Askville | Audible | DPReview | Endless | IMDb | Shopbop | SoundUnwound | Warehouse Deals by Amazon | Zappos Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice  © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates

Product Details

• Hardcover: 200 pages
• Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; 1 edition (June 15, 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0226066649
• ISBN-13: 978-0226066646
• Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 7.1 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #150,086 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #79 in

  Books > Nonfiction > Current Events > September 11

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

50 of 57 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Borradori's Bridging of Philosophical Traditions, June 5, 2003

By	Michael Weintraub (Livingston, NJ USA) - See all my reviews

Giovanna Borradori's most recent project is a groundbreaking endeavor to forge a new understanding of terrorism in the post-9/11 age. Her searching questions draw both Habermas and Derrida from their traditionally diametrically opposed philosophical quarters, highlighting their surprisingly similar stances on what they perceive to be the necessary move toward a quasi-Kantian cosmopolitan international law. Moreover, we find in both of these dialogues and Borradori's supplements a reliance upon a few key figures (Kant, Schmitt, and Arendt for example), suggesting that the philosophical traditions with which each figure identifies-Critical Theory for Habermas and Deconstruction for Derrida-are perhaps not as mutually exclusive or sharply demarcated as we might have previously thought.

The structure of the book, dialogue followed by interpretive essay, helps ground the extemporaneous reflections on terrorism in Habermas' and Derrida's broader philosophical work. Habermas here seems much less conservative than in his other works, though his focus in a sense remains on the possibility of communication and understanding in light of the growing threat of terrorist attacks and current US policy. Derrida acts as our guide on a deconstructive journey, marking important moments and movements such as autoimmunity, always hyper-aware of the context (the end of the Cold War) in which 9/11 and the "war on terrorism" have been played out. To be sure, these dialogues also underscore these philosophers' different understandings, particularly in their responses to Borradori's question of 9/11 as an "event," as well as the proper approach to the United States' "war on terror".

Borradori's ability to fuse topics of terror, the United States' "crusade" against an unknown, unseen, and ever-present enemy, with issues of hospitality and tolerance makes possible a broader discussion than one might imagine. Further, her probing intellect and ability to guide conversation without imposing upon her subjects a pre-determined philosophical agenda make these dialogues remarkably readable and successful; undoubtedly this work has opened up a space for evaluating the possible and necessary contributions that philosophy can make in both critically evaluating and politically altering the course of human events.

8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A good overview of two great minds at work..., January 17, 2004

By	Giovanni Mantilla (Bogota, Colombia) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This book succeeds in two respects. First, both interviews are significant in that they address the subject matter in an analytically rigorous manner, enticing the reader to think-which is by no means a disposable end, in an era of CNN-inspired "analysis"-. The interview with Derrida is particularly enlightening, actually *forcing* you to think "otherwise", to quote another brilliant mind, Foucault. Second, Borradori accomplishes the difficult task of putting in place the reflexions of both philosophers in the context of their own philosophical work, tackling the most important issues relevant to their "way of problematizing", their views on reason, modernity, history, the international context, war & conflict, violence, etc.

This book, of course, does not suffice as a Habermas/Derrida "reader", but it certainly works as a practical exercise in trying to think about the present in ways and words that are not commonplace. Whether you actually agree with Habermas or Derrida is unimportant, what's important is that you have at least given the issue some thought.

I think this book is a small, yet thoroughly enjoyable and worthwile addition to anyone's collection, be it an intellectual or a regular person.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Postmodern situations, postmodern ideas, May 24, 2006

By	FrKurt Messick "FrKurt Messick" (Bloomington, IN USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 10 REVIEWER)

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Paperback)

As Borradori states in his introduction, 'Both [Habermas and Derrida] hold that terrorism is an elusive concept that exposes the global political arena to imminent dangers as well as future challenges.' I think that this sums up what many people feel about the war on terrorism - unlike conflicts such as World War I and World War II, or even the more vaguely defined Cold War or Vietnam war, this is a war where there the front-line can be anywhere and nowhere, where the enemies can be anyone and no one, and where the tactics, strategies, motives and hoped-for achievables are so far removed from what traditional political and military methodology deals with that it requires a paradigm shift in our thinking. 'While the Cold War was characterized by the possibility of balance between two superpowers, it is impossible to build a balance with terrorism because the threat does not come from a state but from incalculable forces and incalculable responsibilities.'

As is typical of Derrida, he sees the relationship between terrorism and communication to be paramount. (I was first exposed to Derrida in theology classes, dealing with the postmodern predicament of looking for meaning in language and behind language in ways that make sense). It is perhaps ironic that the term that springs to mind most when contemplating Derrida is 'deconstruction', which is, in often a dramatically literal sense, what terrorism also hopes to achieve. 'The intellectual grounding of Derrida's deconstruction owes much to the nineteenth- and twentieth-century lineage constituted by Nietzsche, Heidegger and Freud. For Derrida, many of the principles to which the Western tradition has attributed universal validity do not capture what we all share or even hope for.' This becomes all the more problematic when dealing with those outside the Western tradition, such as occurred in Vietnam, Korea, and now in the war on terror.

For Derrida, communication is not simply political. 'Derrida engaged the themes of terror as a psychological and metaphysical state as well as terrorism as a political category.' This draws upon philosophical ideas that can reinterpret the events in various ways, as plays out in various media outlets even to this day. But the events of 9/11 for Derrida are not surprising. 'Was 9/11 truly unpredictable? Not for Derrida. ... The kind of attack that the terrorists launched in 2001 had already been prefigured in detail by the technocinematic culture of our days.'

Habermas also sees communication as a critical element. One issue for Habermas is the speed of modern mass communication - it 'works in the interest of those who select and distribute the information rather than those who receive it. Habermas suggests that the pressure of thinking and evaluating data quickly has a political import, because it facilitates an experience of politics based on the persona of the actors rather than the ideas that each of them defends.' Habermas' theory of communicative action, including its idea of violence as distorted communication, shows the importance of perception, understanding, critical analysis and response.

'Habermas understands modernity to be a change in belief attitude rather than a coherent body of beliefs. A belief attitude indicates the way in which we believe rather than what we believe in. Thus, fundamentalism has less to do with any specific text or religious dogma and more to do with the modality of belief.' This fits in many ways when one commentator I read recently who discussed the overall state of Muslim theology, expressing the understanding that the Muslims have never gone through a period of Reformation as Christendom did, nor have Muslims come to embrace the idea of a society and nation-state separate from religious. Indeed, we can hear echoes of this latter idea in political speech in America, often from groups that can be described as (and often embrace the term) fundamentalist. This will continue to be an issue in the war on terror.

Another issue for Habermas will be the issue of nation-state vs. international organisation power. 'Habermas is convinced that what separates the present moment from a full transition to cosmopolitanism is not only a theoretical matter but a practical one, too, for the decisions of the international community need to be respected. ... Unfortunately, the power differential between national and international authorities threatens to weaken the legitimacy of any military intervention and to retool police action as war.' This has been true not just in the twentieth century, but previously as well. The Congress of Vienna, the League of Nations, and the United Nations have all failed to have power to counter the superpowers of their times; alliances such as NATO and the Warsaw Pact relied heavily on one particular partner.

For both Derrida and Habermas, the war on terror is not as simple as Arab vs. West, Muslim against Christian/post-Christian society, or particular nations against one another. Perhaps had this been written after the recent situation with the Dubai acquisition of American ports being stopped, they would have pointed out that once again, our definitions and communicative premises fail - how does one balance the idea that foreign ownership of ports is unwise with the fact that few are concerned when British, Canadian, Australian or Norwegian firms do the same? There is a lack of definition about it all, even when all the words we use, to bring about clarity. The war on terror might be the quintessential post-modern situation.