|
|||||||||||||
An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism by Madan Sarup
$21.95
|
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge Classics) by Karl R. Popper
$13.57
|
Against Method by Paul Feyerabend
$18.00
|
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge by Peter L. Berger
$11.16
|
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought by Thomas S. Kuhn
$18.45
|
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is indeed a paradigmatic work in the history of science. Kuhn's use of terms such as "paradigm shift" and "normal science," his ideas of how scientists move from disdain through doubt to acceptance of a new theory, his stress on social and psychological factors in science--all have had profound effects on historians, scientists, philosophers, critics, writers, business gurus, and even the cartoonist in the street.
Some scientists (such as Steven Weinberg and Ernst Mayr) are profoundly irritated by Kuhn, especially by the doubts he casts--or the way his work has been used to cast doubt--on the idea of scientific progress. Yet it has been said that the acceptance of plate tectonics in the 1960s, for instance, was sped by geologists' reluctance to be on the downside of a paradigm shift. Even Weinberg has said that "Structure has had a wider influence than any other book on the history of science." As one of Kuhn's obituaries noted, "We all live in a post-Kuhnian age." --Mary Ellen Curtin
Nicholas Wade
Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been a resounding success.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
See all Editorial Reviews
Product Details
|