Air Apparent: How Meteorologists Learned to Map, Predict, and Dramatize Weather (Hardcover)

by Mark Monmonier (Author)

Editorial Reviews

From Scientific American
Clever title, rewarding book. Monmonier, professor of geography at Syracuse University, offers here a basic course in meteorology, which he presents gracefully by means of a history of weather maps. The earliest of the many such maps that illustrate the book was published in 1686 by English astronomer Edmond Halley; it showed trade winds and monsoons in, as Halley put it, "the Seas between and near the Tropicks, with an Attempt to Assign the Phisical Cause of the Said Winds." By the end of the book, one is looking at maps based on such high-tech meteorological aids as weather satellites, radar and the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer. Contemporary meteorology, Monmonier says, is "arguably today's single most map-intensive scientific enterprise."

Review
Air Apparent ... is good, accessible science and excellent history. Monmonier jumps skillfully from anecdote to meteorological theory to cartography. And he is no slouch at modern forecasts. -- New Scientist, Fred Pearce

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 324 pages
• Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; 1 edition (April 15, 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0226534227
• ISBN-13: 978-0226534220
• Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 5.8 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #292,100 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #10 in

  Books > Science > Earth Sciences > Meteorology > Forecasting

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A serious, well-written book, September 17, 2000

By	Justin Douglas Tygar (Berkeley, CA USA) - See all my reviews

This book uses weather maps as a central motif. It discusses issues of meteorology (although it is not really a primer on meteorology, as suggested by the Scientific American review), cartography, graphic design, and mass media. It is lightly written but well documented and intelligently illustrated. It is a great read for those who enjoy science books.

13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Good book on a neglected topic, September 23, 2000

By	Kevin W. Parker (Greenbelt, MD) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

There have been many books about the history of maps, but few have addressed one of the types of maps that we consult most regularly: the weather map. Monmonier, a professor of geography at Syracuse University and author of several previous books, endeavors to remedy this deficiency and does so admirably.

He goes back to the earliest days of investigating the weather, before telephone or telegraph when any weather map had to be put together days or more after the fact. But it gets done, even so, and when higher-speed communications are available, people are ready.

He goes on to cover developments both technological and social: the advent of radar as a weather detection tool as well as the now-routine weather satellite views, but also how the weather is covered in the news, including the development of the newspaper weather map from the dull black-and-white diagrams that were once routine to the multicolored glory of USA Today's weather map.

There's weather on television, too, and he spends time talking about both The Weather Channel's coverage with their many maps on a chroma-key background and how local stations cover the weather using the latest in technology, from doppler radar to the fancy, fly-through 3-D graphics that many of them seem to use these days.

My personal preference would have been to learn more about the earliest days of the weather maps and how they were developed and less about the development of the glitzy modern weather reporting, but perhaps that is just me, and, considering the ubiquity of the latter, I can't fault its inclusion.

Overall, it's a well-written, good read, and highly recommended for the weather fanatics among us (and I must include myself!).