Universals: Studies in Indian Logic and Linguistics (Hardcover)

by Frits Staal (Author) "IT may be possible to study special cases of the general philosophical problem, how language and thought are correlated, by considering definite thought structures and..." (more)
Key Phrases: kdraka relations, karman relation, tatpurusa compound, New York, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Miss Shefts (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

This collection of articles and review essays, including many hard to find pieces, comprises the most important and fundamental studies of Indian logic and linguistics ever undertaken.

Frits Staal is concerned with four basic questions: Are there universals of logic that transcend culture and time? Are there universals of language and linguistics? What is the nature of Indian logic? And what is the nature of Indian linguistics? By addressing these questions, Staal demonstrates that, contrary to the general assumption among Western philosophers, the classical philosophers of India were rationalists, attentive to arguments. They were in this respect unlike contemporary Western thinkers inspired by existentialism or hermeneutics, and like the ancient Chinese, Greeks, and many medieval European schoolmen, only—as Staal says—more so. Universals establishes that Asia's contributions are not only compatible with what has been produced in the West, but a necessary ingredient and an essential component of any future human science.

About the Author

Frits Staal is professor of philosophy and South Asian languages at the University of California, Berkeley.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 278 pages
• Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; 1 edition (March 23, 1988)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0226769992
• ISBN-13: 978-0226769998
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.3 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #3,510,579 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Incomprehensible to the Untrained Reader, January 21, 2002

By	E. Filson (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I bought this book based on a bibliographical entry in Burton Stein's "A History of India." Perhaps I was being conceited as Stein calls it "very deep stuff" and I thought "I like very deep stuff." This book, however, uses formal logic of the third-semester-logic-course variety, two semesters beyond what I took ever so long ago. Additionally, most of the essays require working knowledge of Sanskrit, a dead language. If you fit either of these qualifications then, by god, read this book and make your education worthwhile. Otherwise you're up a creek on this one.

The introduction, incidentally, is very interesting, but pertains more to his book "Exploring Mysticism" which I've just ordered as he made it sound so fascinating. Read that one.

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Against the "two cultures" idea., May 29, 2006

By	P. Taborsky (China) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

In this volume Staal tries to make an important point that needs emphasis: That C.P. Snow's 'two cultures' slogan, which insists that the humanities are not a science, (and which derives from the German Romanticists), is a mistaken one. Thus, linguistics and logic (as the study of discourse and reasoning) can be studied by empirical methods. These methods must be based on, or will eventually uncover, universals of logic and language, that is to say commonalities that can be subject to rational investigation. This at once torpedos the whole hermeneutical dilemma and the fashionability of much current thinking on the uniqueness of cultures. However, as Staal, says, this is only partially a philosophical presumption. There is also empirical evidence, and this book attempts to present some of that evidence.

The only trouble with this volume is its rather technical nature. Contrary to the other reviewer, I do not believe that the symbolic logic used in it is much of a barrier. Anyone familiar with the predicate calculus will understand it. The additional symbolism is clearly explained in the book. Some of the papers, however, are marred by some unfortunate typos that make the symbolism harder to understand than it really is. As well, it is not necessary to have a knowledge of Sanskrit. That being said, some knowledge of the grammar of an inflected language (like Latin or Greek) and phonetics is necessary. It would also be helpful to have some aquaintance with the technicalites of Indian philosophy, some of which are rather not very well explained in the original papers that went into this book, written as they were for an academic audience that would have been familiar with them.