Persecution and the Art of Writing (Paperback)

~ (Author) "The subject matter of the following essays may be said to fall within the province of the sociology of knowledge..." (more)
Key Phrases: rational nomoi, iura naturalia, vulgi loqui, Mishneh Torah, New Testament, Old Testament (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

The essays collected in Persecution and the Art of Writing all deal with one problem—the relation between philosophy and politics. Here, Strauss sets forth the thesis that many philosophers, especially political philosophers, have reacted to the threat of persecution by disguising their most controversial and heterodox ideas.

About the Author

Leo Strauss's contributions to political philosophy include Natural Right and History, Platonic Political Philosophy, and The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, all published by the University of Chicago Press.

---

Product Details Paperback: 214 pages Publisher: University Of Chicago Press (October 15, 1988) Language: English ISBN-10: 0226777111 ISBN-13: 978-0226777115 Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.5 x 0.6 inches Shipping Weight: 9.1 ounces (View shipping rates and policies) Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews) Amazon.com Sales Rank: #247,581 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books) Popular in this category: (What's this?) #15 in  Books > Religion & Spirituality > Judaism > Philosophy

---

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Leo Strauss Page

Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
The subject matter of the following essays may be said to fall within the province of the sociology of knowledge. Read the first page

Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
rational nomoi, iura naturalia, vulgi loqui, captum vulgi, aseh merkabah, rational commandments, intelligible books, governmental part, potential philosophers, philosophic book, aseh bereshit, secret topics, governmental laws, philosophic teaching, exoteric teaching, hieroglyphic books, philosophic criticism, psychic laws, virtuous city, ius naturale, rational laws, vulgar view, secret teaching, philosophic life

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Mishneh Torah, New Testament, Old Testament, Ibn Tibbon, Plato's Laws, New York, Fárábi's Plato, Middle Ages, Plato's Republic, Eight Chapters, God of Aristotle, Paul Kraus, Shem Tob, Jewish Quarterly Review, Julius Guttmann, Nabatean Agriculture

New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Citations (learn more)

This book cites 14 books:

• The Guide for the Perplexed by Moses Maimonides in Front Matter, page 19, and page 38
• Political Treatise by Benedictus de Spinoza in Front Matter, page 142, and page 199
• Theological-Political Treatise: Gebhardt Edition by Benedictus de Spinoza in Front Matter, and page 199
• A Theologico-Political Treatise by Benedictus de Spinoza in Front Matter, and page 199
• The Guide of the Perplexed, Vol. 1 by Moses Maimonides on page 155, and page 181

See all 14 books this book cites

 

100 books cite this book:

• Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation by Leora Batnitzky on 13 pages
• Discourses on Strauss: Revelation And Reason in Leo Strauss And His Critical Study of Machiavelli by Kim A. Sorensen on 8 pages
• Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida by Catherine H. Zuckert on 7 pages
• The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy) by Daniel H. Frank on 6 pages
• Leo Strauss and the American Right by Prof. Shadia B. Drury on 5 pages

See all 100 books citing this book

---

Books on Related Topics (learn more)

Plato and the Socratic Dialogue by Charles H. Kahn

Discusses:

• virtuous city
• vulgar view
• philosophic life

The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy by Peter Adamson

Discusses:

• philosophic teaching
• exoteric teaching
• virtuous city

On Tyranny by Leo Strauss

Discusses:

• potential philosophers
• philosophic teaching
• exoteric teaching

What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies by Leo Strauss

Discusses:

• potential philosophers
• philosophic book
• philosophic teaching

The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy by Daniel H. Frank

Discusses:

• aseh bereshit
• Mishneh Torah
• Plato's Laws

The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism by Leo Strauss

Discusses:

• philosophic book
• exoteric teaching
• philosophic life

Plato and the Socratic Dialogue by Charles H. Kahn Discusses: virtuous city vulgar view philosophic life The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy by Peter Adamson Discusses: philosophic teaching exoteric teaching virtuous city On Tyranny by Leo Strauss Discusses: potential philosophers philosophic teaching exoteric teaching What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies by Leo Strauss Discusses: potential philosophers philosophic book philosophic teaching Loading...

---

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	82% buy the item featured on this page: Persecution and the Art of Writing 4.0 out of 5 stars (7) $13.44
	6% buy The City and Man 4.8 out of 5 stars (6) $14.53
	5% buy History of Political Philosophy 4.7 out of 5 stars (15) $19.36
	5% buy What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies 5.0 out of 5 stars (3) $18.81

Explore similar items

---

Tags Customers Associate with This Product  (What's this?) Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people. Check the boxes next to the tags you consider relevant or enter your own tags in the field below.  philosophy(1) Your tags: Add your first tag

Search Products Tagged with   See most popular tags

---

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

---

 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews 5 star:  (4) 4 star:    (0) 3 star:  (2) 2 star:  (1) 1 star:    (0)           Average Customer Review 4.0 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews 23 of 23 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent source for readers of philosophy, October 24, 2000 By A Customer An excellent text, Strauss explicates on his views of how philosophers in times of persecution will "hide" their most stunning and important ideas "between the lines" of their works. In this way, the authors avoid death, and also provide the deepest insight to only those intelligent enough to find it in the texts. Pay special attention to Strauss's chapter on the "Guide for the Perplexed:" not only is it an interesting read, but one can see Strauss himself using some of the same techniques that he claims authors of the past used. It's all a matter of trying to understand what he truly wants to tell us. 12 of 14 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars How to write between the lines, June 16, 2000 By  Wm M Hatch (Merced, CA) - See all my reviews The title essay is a masterpiece I read once a month in the course writing journalism by day and reading of political comedy by night. By day it is extremely helpful keeping my job in a political environment not particularly conducive to complete freedom of expression at times. By night, coupled with Strauss's superb "Socrates and Aristophanes" is has proved a wonderful tool for unveiling meaning in Aristophanes, Rabelais, Cervantes, Sterne, Hasek, Garcia-Marquez, Kundera and the rest of the European comic tradition. I think his idea of a literary criticism "between the lines" based on ancient rhetoricians would be an extremely useful study for younger graduate students to follow - whenever such studies become possible again. The rest of the essays apply the theory of reading between the lines in interesting limit cases of persecution of political philosophy. They may lead the general reader to try such authors as Maimonides and Spinoza. Can't speak for specialists, not being one. 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Strategems which Errors seem..., May 25, 2008 By  greg taylor (Portland, Oregon United States) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)       This book is absolutely central within the body of Leo Strauss's work. It stands as the culmination of his earliest work and the beginning of his middle phase of work (which most readers and commentators seem to focus on). Leo Strauss started his philosophical career directly confronted with what he would come to call the "theological-political problem". As a Jewish intellectual in during the Weimer years, he found himself confronted with the ways that liberal political philosophy had failed the Jewish people. That confrontation led him from an exploration of different forms of Zionism to the roots of the Enlightenment critique of revelation in Spinoza and Hobbes and back to (what Strauss called) the Medieval Enlightenment works of Maimonides, Farabi and Halevi. Particularly in the writing of Maimonides and Farabi (but also in the writings of Lessing), Strauss found the clues that led him to his theory of esoteric and exoteric writing. When talking about this Straussian way of reading, the first thing to emphasize is that it is not a universal hermeneutic. Strauss is not saying that all philosophy or theological books were written with an esoteric component. He is saying that some were and that there are indications that can be used to detect when a book is so written. Before we get to that, let's consider THE basic presumption of Strauss's- that there are two types of men, philosophers and non-philosophers. And the two are motivated fundamentally differently and are capable of fundamentally different lives. Furthermore, it is important to realize that what Strauss believes is going on in an esoteric text is that one philosopher is writing in such a way that other philosophers can discern his hidden meaning. Why would someone do this? This is also key. Strauss feels that since the mid-1800s in most Western cultures that it has not been as necessary to write this way. In fact, as a culture, we have forgotten that this was necessary. The radical Enlightenment determined that all truths must be told to all humanity and we have come to accept that. But not long ago, that was not the case. Men and women died or were tortured for daring to express the heterodox thought. So the first reason philosophers wrote esoterically is to avoid the fate of Socrates. The second reason is more Straussian. Philosophers wrote that way for reasons of propriety. They too believed that most men were not capable of living the philosophical life with its calling into question of all opinion (see p.59 of PAW). They furthermore believed that "opinion is the element of society: philosphy or science is therefore the attempt to dissolve the element in which society breathes" (the quote is from the essay On a Forgotten Kind of Writing in the collection What is Political Philosophy). So the philosophers (the wise men), by disguising their questioning of the dogmas on which any one society is based, acts responsibly. They do not call into question those dogmas for those for whom it would be hard to live virtuously without them (the vulgar). (Before you go ballistic with the elitism of it all please remember that this is what Strauss is saying that people like Maimonides, Farabi and Plato thought- what he thinks is a lot more elusive. Also keep in mind, that it is easy to find this same attitude in our Founding Fathers. Very very few of them were free of some form of the wise man/ vulgar dichotomy. The whole idea of the Electoral College is based on it.) The third reason one writes esoterically is to unearth "the young men...[who] might become philosophers: the potential philosphers are to be led step by step from the popular view which are indispensable for all practical and political purposes to the truth which is ...purely theoretical" (p. 36 of PAW) (By far, the most disturbing thing about Strauss is the complete lack of women as any sort of presence in his writings- for someone who was romantically intrigued by Hannah Arendt in their youth (she loathed him) this absence seems almost like a symptom. Of what I have no idea. I'm just saying.) So we should look for esoteric literature during time of repression. What other clues should we look for? There are four main clues from what I can tell. The first is in the determination of the literary or rhetorical nature of the work in question. Strauss never fails to point out the Plato's works are dialogues, that you cannot assume that Socrates or the Athenian Stranger is the stand-in for Plato, that what is Platonic has to be ascertained as a result of the all the conversational strands. (See his essay on Plato in the collection The History of Political Philosophy). The second is that someone who is a careful and precise writer writes something that contradicts something else they wrote. There are a lot or ways to do this. On pp. 70-73, Strauss lists five different ways that Maimonides contradicts himself throughout the Guide for the Perplexed. For example, Strauss notes that it is possible to express a contradiction by contradicting not the original proposition but one of its implications. The casual reader does not notice this but the careful reader does and begins to try to understand why someone like Maimonides or Plato would make such a mistake. A third clue is a specific instruction from the author on how to read the works of others. Thomas Pangle provides some good examples of this from Locke's First Treatise in p.137 of his The Spirit of Modern Republicanism. Locke, e.g., wrote that "in a Discourse of this Nature," written by "a Master of Style...obscurity [which includes "silently passing over" matters that could not be avoided were a frank and full exposition provided] cannot be imputed to want of Language." This is Locke's way of telling the reader to look for such passages in his own work and to search out the hidden meaning. The fourth clue is the use of commentary. In his essay on Farabi's reading of Plato, Strauss points out passages where Farabi acts ignorant of aspects of Plato philosophy of which he could not possibly be ignorant. It is through rhetorical devices like these, that authors both indicate a hidden meaning and hide that meaning. Obviously, there are as many strategems as authors. There are some obvious advantages to Strauss's approach. First, and foremost, his is a humble approach. He does not approach the thinkers of the past assuming that he knows more than they do or that his place in history gives him a priviledged position as to truth. His approach to the reading of others opens us up to learning from them. It opens us up to the possibility that Farabi or Maimonides may enrich my life and become my teacher. Strauss has really opened up the possibilities with this approach. He is not offering us anything like a universal approach. He is forcing us to sink into the particular of each author. What we do with this approach is up to us. Suggested readings: The essays by Diskin Clay and Paul A. Cantor in Alan Udoff's collection, Leo Strauss's Thought, are extremely useful. I flat out stole my review title form Cantor's use of a quote from Pope as an epigraph.		Ad feedback   Most Recent Customer Reviews 2.0 out of 5 stars Logica equina This book is an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Or perhaps not. The historians must be aided by the sociologists of knowledge. That is a fact. Read more Published 10 months ago by Ashtar Command 3.0 out of 5 stars Mr. Way Too Quickly Mr. Quickly (see review below) is either a prankster or an idiot. He has confused the philosopher, Leo Strauss, with the composer Richard Strauss. Read more Published on January 11, 2006 by Andrew V. Jeffery 3.0 out of 5 stars Contra the Neo-Cons... Now that certain of his followers have risen to such unpredictably high prominence and stuck around, Leo Strauss is getting more attention. This is good. Read more Published on December 4, 2004 by Myron Makewater 5.0 out of 5 stars Who knew this book could say all this? I bought PERSECUTION AND THE ART OF WRITING because I wanted an easy approach to whatever contribution Leo Strauss might be able to make to the understanding of political... Read more Published on May 18, 2002 by Bruce P. Barten Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews

---

Customer Discussions

This product's forum Discussion Replies Latest Post No discussions yet Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight Start a new discussion Topic: First post: Receive e-mail when new posts are made Prompts for sign-in   Guidelines Active discussions in related forums Discussion Replies Latest Post politics What happen to George Bush? No one talk about him anymore. 67 2 minutes ago textbook Textbooks for Kindle DX? 66 3 minutes ago politics Taxing junk food and diet soda pop 25 4 minutes ago politics So much for the separation of church and state 126 4 minutes ago politics Does the USA need a revolution? 124 5 minutes ago textbook textbook scam 78 2 days ago textbooks trade-in What are you going to use your GC on? 0 9 days ago Search Customer Discussions Search all Amazon discussions

The Politics community Latest activity 41 minutes ago 12,425 customers have contributed 9,661 products, 1,023 discussions and more... › Explore the community The Political Philosophy community Latest activity 1 day ago 752 customers have contributed 748 products, 73 lists & guides and more... › Explore the community The Conservatism community Latest activity 3 hours ago 2,100 customers have contributed 1,903 products, 148 lists & guides and more... › Explore the community Related forums conservatism (14 discussions) political... (3 discussions) politics (1023 discussions) textbook (19 discussions) textbooks... (1 discussion) Explore more › See all Customer Communities › Your communities

---

Listmania!

Political Philosophy: A list by Andrew Levidis   Secondary Literature on Leo Strauss: A list by greg taylor   Strauss Reading List: A list by Political Theory Create a Listmania! list

Search Listmania!

---

So You'd Like to...

Know about Medieval Islamic-Jewish Philosophy & Leo Strauss: A guide by Joseph Martin "pomonomo2003"   Understand the Permanent Crisis of Political Philosophy - 1: A guide by Joseph Martin "pomonomo2003"   read great books regarding the History of Political ideas?: A guide by bel_78 "Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought him back" Create a guide

Search Guides

---

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Be the first person to add an article about this item at Amapedia.com.

› See featured Amapedia.com articles

---

Look for Similar Items by Category

• Books > Literature & Fiction > History & Criticism > Criticism & Theory
• Books > Nonfiction > Philosophy > Philosophy of Religion > Judaism
• Books > Nonfiction > Politics > Freedom & Security
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Political Science
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Popular Culture
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Sociology

---

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:
Maimonides, Moses,
Philosophy and religion
Politics / Current Events
General
Literary Criticism / General
Political Science / General
Popular Culture - General
Social Science / Popular Culture
Dalalat al-hairin
Judah
Kitab al-hujjah
Maimonides, Moses
Freedom of information & freedom of speech
Political oppression & persecution
Politics & government
Philosophy Of Judaism
Social Science
Politics/International Relations
Sociology
Judaism and philosophy
Philosophy, Jewish
Philosophy, Medieval
Literary Theory


i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Ad feedback

 

Feedback If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide? Your comments can help make our site better for everyone. Please note that we are unable to respond directly to all feedback submitted via this form, but we'll ask you to sign in so we can contact you if needed.

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

› View and edit your browsing history

Get to Know Us Careers Investor Relations Press Releases Amazon and Our Planet Make Money with Us Sell on Amazon Join Associates Self-publish with Us › See all Let Us Help You Shipping Rates & Policies Amazon Prime Returns Help

Canada | China | France | Germany | Japan | United Kingdom  And don't forget: Amazon Windowshop | AmazonWireless | Askville | Audible | DPReview | Endless | IMDb | Shopbop | SoundUnwound | Warehouse Deals by Amazon | Zappos Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice  © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates

Product Details

• Paperback: 214 pages
• Publisher: University Of Chicago Press (October 15, 1988)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0226777111
• ISBN-13: 978-0226777115
• Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.5 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 9.1 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #247,581 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #15 in

  Books > Religion & Spirituality > Judaism > Philosophy

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

23 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent source for readers of philosophy, October 24, 2000

By A Customer

An excellent text, Strauss explicates on his views of how philosophers in times of persecution will "hide" their most stunning and important ideas "between the lines" of their works. In this way, the authors avoid death, and also provide the deepest insight to only those intelligent enough to find it in the texts. Pay special attention to Strauss's chapter on the "Guide for the Perplexed:" not only is it an interesting read, but one can see Strauss himself using some of the same techniques that he claims authors of the past used. It's all a matter of trying to understand what he truly wants to tell us.

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars How to write between the lines, June 16, 2000

By	Wm M Hatch (Merced, CA) - See all my reviews

The title essay is a masterpiece I read once a month in the course writing journalism by day and reading of political comedy by night. By day it is extremely helpful keeping my job in a political environment not particularly conducive to complete freedom of expression at times. By night, coupled with Strauss's superb "Socrates and Aristophanes" is has proved a wonderful tool for unveiling meaning in Aristophanes, Rabelais, Cervantes, Sterne, Hasek, Garcia-Marquez, Kundera and the rest of the European comic tradition. I think his idea of a literary criticism "between the lines" based on ancient rhetoricians would be an extremely useful study for younger graduate students to follow - whenever such studies become possible again. The rest of the essays apply the theory of reading between the lines in interesting limit cases of persecution of political philosophy. They may lead the general reader to try such authors as Maimonides and Spinoza. Can't speak for specialists, not being one.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Strategems which Errors seem..., May 25, 2008

By	greg taylor (Portland, Oregon United States) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)

This book is absolutely central within the body of Leo Strauss's work. It stands as the culmination of his earliest work and the beginning of his middle phase of work (which most readers and commentators seem to focus on).
Leo Strauss started his philosophical career directly confronted with what he would come to call the "theological-political problem". As a Jewish intellectual in during the Weimer years, he found himself confronted with the ways that liberal political philosophy had failed the Jewish people. That confrontation led him from an exploration of different forms of Zionism to the roots of the Enlightenment critique of revelation in Spinoza and Hobbes and back to (what Strauss called) the Medieval Enlightenment works of Maimonides, Farabi and Halevi. Particularly in the writing of Maimonides and Farabi (but also in the writings of Lessing), Strauss found the clues that led him to his theory of esoteric and exoteric writing.
When talking about this Straussian way of reading, the first thing to emphasize is that it is not a universal hermeneutic. Strauss is not saying that all philosophy or theological books were written with an esoteric component. He is saying that some were and that there are indications that can be used to detect when a book is so written.
Before we get to that, let's consider THE basic presumption of Strauss's- that there are two types of men, philosophers and non-philosophers. And the two are motivated fundamentally differently and are capable of fundamentally different lives. Furthermore, it is important to realize that what Strauss believes is going on in an esoteric text is that one philosopher is writing in such a way that other philosophers can discern his hidden meaning.
Why would someone do this? This is also key. Strauss feels that since the mid-1800s in most Western cultures that it has not been as necessary to write this way. In fact, as a culture, we have forgotten that this was necessary. The radical Enlightenment determined that all truths must be told to all humanity and we have come to accept that.
But not long ago, that was not the case. Men and women died or were tortured for daring to express the heterodox thought. So the first reason philosophers wrote esoterically is to avoid the fate of Socrates.
The second reason is more Straussian. Philosophers wrote that way for reasons of propriety. They too believed that most men were not capable of living the philosophical life with its calling into question of all opinion (see p.59 of PAW). They furthermore believed that "opinion is the element of society: philosphy or science is therefore the attempt to dissolve the element in which society breathes" (the quote is from the essay On a Forgotten Kind of Writing in the collection What is Political Philosophy).
So the philosophers (the wise men), by disguising their questioning of
the dogmas on which any one society is based, acts responsibly. They do not call into question those dogmas for those for whom it would be hard to live virtuously without them (the vulgar). (Before you go ballistic with the elitism of it all please remember that this is what Strauss is saying that people like Maimonides, Farabi and Plato thought- what he thinks is a lot more elusive. Also keep in mind, that it is easy to find this same attitude in our Founding Fathers. Very very few of them were free of some form of the wise man/ vulgar dichotomy. The whole idea of the Electoral College is based on it.)
The third reason one writes esoterically is to unearth "the young men...[who] might become philosophers: the potential philosphers are to be led step by step from the popular view which are indispensable for all practical and political purposes to the truth which is ...purely theoretical" (p. 36 of PAW) (By far, the most disturbing thing about Strauss is the complete lack of women as any sort of presence in his writings- for someone who was romantically intrigued by Hannah Arendt in their youth (she loathed him) this absence seems almost like a symptom. Of what I have no idea. I'm just saying.)
So we should look for esoteric literature during time of repression. What other clues should we look for? There are four main clues from what I can tell.
The first is in the determination of the literary or rhetorical nature of the work in question. Strauss never fails to point out the Plato's works are dialogues, that you cannot assume that Socrates or the Athenian Stranger is the stand-in for Plato, that what is Platonic has to be ascertained as a result of the all the conversational strands. (See his essay on Plato in the collection The History of Political Philosophy).
The second is that someone who is a careful and precise writer writes something that contradicts something else they wrote. There are a lot or ways to do this. On pp. 70-73, Strauss lists five different ways that Maimonides contradicts himself throughout the Guide for the Perplexed. For example, Strauss notes that it is possible to express a contradiction by contradicting not the original proposition but one of its implications. The casual reader does not notice this but the careful reader does and begins to try to understand why someone like Maimonides or Plato would make such a mistake.
A third clue is a specific instruction from the author on how to read the works of others. Thomas Pangle provides some good examples of this from Locke's First Treatise in p.137 of his The Spirit of Modern Republicanism.
Locke, e.g., wrote that "in a Discourse of this Nature," written by "a Master of Style...obscurity [which includes "silently passing over" matters that could not be avoided were a frank and full exposition provided] cannot be imputed to want of Language." This is Locke's way of telling the reader to look for such passages in his own work and to search out the hidden meaning.
The fourth clue is the use of commentary. In his essay on Farabi's
reading of Plato, Strauss points out passages where Farabi acts ignorant
of aspects of Plato philosophy of which he could not possibly be ignorant.
It is through rhetorical devices like these, that authors both indicate a
hidden meaning and hide that meaning. Obviously, there are as many
strategems as authors.
There are some obvious advantages to Strauss's approach. First, and
foremost, his is a humble approach. He does not approach the thinkers of the past assuming that he knows more than they do or that his place in history gives him a priviledged position as to truth. His approach to the reading of others opens us up to learning from them. It opens us up to the possibility that Farabi or Maimonides may enrich my life and become my teacher. Strauss has really opened up the possibilities with this approach. He is not offering us anything like a universal approach. He is forcing us to sink into the particular of each author. What we do with this approach is up to us.
Suggested readings: The essays by Diskin Clay and Paul A. Cantor in Alan Udoff's collection, Leo Strauss's Thought, are extremely useful. I flat out stole my review title form Cantor's use of a quote from Pope as an epigraph.