Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered (Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology) (Hardcover)

~ Bruce H. Weber (Editor), David J. Depew (Editor) "In recent years, a number of evolutionary theorists have spoken well of a turn-of-the-twentieth-century idea that since the nineteen fifties has gone by the name..." (more)
Key Phrases: proximate environmental effects, hidden genetic variability, genetic assimilation, New York, Lloyd Morgan, Maynard Smith (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Evolution and Learning is a readable and challenging volume, and I would recommend it strongly to people who enjoy thinking hard about evolution." - Kevin N. Laland, Nature" --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Description

The role of genetic inheritance dominates current evolutionary theory. At the end of the nineteenth century, however, several evolutionary theorists independently speculated that learned behaviors could also affect the direction and rate of evolutionary change. This notion was called the Baldwin effect, after the psychologist James Mark Baldwin. In recent years, philosophers and theorists of a variety of ontological and epistemological backgrounds have begun to employ the Baldwin effect in their accounts of the evolutionary emergence of mind and of how mind, through behavior, might affect evolution. The essays in this book discuss the originally proposed Baldwin effect, how it was modified over time, and its possible contribution to contemporary empirical and theoretical evolutionary studies. The topics include the effect of the modern evolutionary synthesis on the notion of the Baldwin effect, the nature and role of niche construction in contemporary evolutionary theory, the Baldwin effect in the context of developmental systems theory, the possible role of the Baldwin effect in computational cognitive science biosemiotics, and the emergence of consciousness and language.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 351 pages
• Publisher: The MIT Press; illustrated edition edition (July 13, 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0262232294
• ISBN-13: 978-0262232296
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.4 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #330,271 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #28 in

  Books > Health, Mind & Body > Psychology & Counseling > By Topic > Learning

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Like Attending a First-Class Conference, May 28, 2007

By	Herbert Gintis (Northampton, MA USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)

Amazon Verified Purchase

In the history of biology, Lamarkians were the humanists who believed that experience could enrich the genetic structure of organisms. When Weissmann proved the continuity of the germ line, which implies that phenotypic learning could not be incorporated in the genes of an organism's offspring, it led to panic for the Lamarkians. James Mark Baldwin, the developmental biologist, Lloyd Morgan and Conrad Waddington all jumped to fill the breach with a variety of mechanisms that would allow some causal arrow from learning to genes to survive the "continuity of the germ line."

Of course, phenotypes, not genotypes, are selected, so there is ample room for plastic phenotypes to be selected, and the genetic basis of their plasticity or ease of learning to adapt to particular environments to become fixed in the gene pool. However, until Dawkins' "extended phenotype" and more recently Odling-Smee, Laland, and Feldman's "niche construction" theories were developed, the whole matter was quite vague.

This conference volume outlines the history of the Baldwin Effect, and the effect of the interchange of expert opinion on the reader should be pretty clear: niche construction and in the case of humans, gene-culture coevolution are the intellectual heirs of the Baldwin Effect and are extremely important biological phenomena. Paul Griffiths' and Terrence Deacon's contributions to the volume make this crystal clear. Numerous evo-devo types also want to claim a piece of the Baldwin effect, but despite reams of material on how development affects the gene pool, I remain unconvinced. But, perhaps that's my limited perspective. At any rate, if you know a fair amount of evolutionary and developmental biology, this is really quite a fine book to read. Perhaps even better than attending the original conference.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Partial synopsis, March 26, 2009

By	Viktor Blasjo - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Godfrey-Smith. The Baldwin effect purports that acquired traits can become genetically assimilated. This is supposedly because learning is fallible and expensive in terms of time and cognitive resources, so a hard-wiring is beneficial. Two objections arise. First, the process seems self-defeating, since it is triggered by learning but ends up giving up plasticity for rigidity. Second, the learning step seems superfluous: why not go straight to the innate trait? To this latter objection three replies have been given. (1) Breathing space (Baldwin). Learning enables the species to survive long enough for the right combination of genes or mutation to occur. This assumes that the ability to acquire a trait is more prevalent than having a gene for it, so the self-defeating argument applies. Also, "do-or-die" situations are very rare. (2) Good learners are genetically closer to the innate configuration for the trait, bringing it within genetic reach. The Hinton and Nowlan simulation which is supposed to show the feasibility of the Baldwin effect actually has this dubious assumption built in to it. The genome is modelled as a string made up of the symbols 0, 1, ?, where 111... is the optimum, and ?-bits leave room for trial-and-error learning. Obviously, good learners (i.e., those who hit upon 111... by randomising their ?s) will generally have more hard-wired 1s than poor learners. So selection for learning and selection for innateness coincide: the model does not leave room for other forms of learning improvement such as skewing the randomisation or increasing the number of trials. (Dennet tries to defend the Hinton and Nowlan model in his chapter, but his argument shows only that selection for learning will bring organisms "closer in learning space" to the desired behavioural trait; this does nothing to resolve the issue of whether this simultaneously means that the organisms will come closer in genetic space to hard-wiring the trait.) (3) Niche construction. The gene is useless before learning. See Deacon below.

Deacon. The niche-construction point of view "breaks the pseudo-Lamarckian mould," for it does not maintain that acquired traits become genetically assimilated. This is a good thing because this simplistic version of the Baldwin effect fares poorly when applied to the evolution of human language (e.g., Pinker). It assumes, implausibly, the ability of incremental genetic changes to reach this predescribed goal; and is also empirically unsuccessful (e.g., innate control of vocalisation has actually decreased in human evolution). Instead one should think in terms of masking. Most genes are masked from selection since they have no substantial phenotypic effect in the current environment. A change in the environment will unmask some of these and mask others. Thus natural selection need not wait for and does not look for the genetic equivalents of learned behaviours; instead learning unmasks a pool of previously silent genes from which support for the learned behaviour can be drawn in a number of ways. For example, when Waddington exposed flies to heat he unmasked a diverse set of previously silent genes scattered in the population, the beneficial ones of which were driven to genetic fixation. The evolution of human language is probably of this type, with the added complexity that the adaptations alters the behaviour in turn.