Janos Bolyai, Non-Euclidean Geometry, and the Nature of Space (Paperback)

by Jeremy J. Gray (Author) "WE REMEMBER the Hungarian mathematician Janos Bolyai, who lived from 1802 to 1860, because he is one of the few people who changed forever our..." (more)
Key Phrases: contra hyp, angular defect, rectilineal triangle, Euclid's Elements, János Bolyai, Farkas Bolyai (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
Janos Bolyai (1802-1860) was a mathematician who changed our fundamental ideas about space. As a teenager he started to explore a set of nettlesome geometrical problems, including Euclid's parallel postulate, and in 1832 he published a brilliant twenty-four-page paper that eventually shook the foundations of the 2000-year-old tradition of Euclidean geometry. Bolyai's "Appendix" (published as just that--an appendix to a much longer mathematical work by his father) set up a series of mathematical proposals whose implications would blossom into the new field of non-Euclidean geometry, providing essential intellectual background for ideas as varied as the theory of relativity and the work of Marcel Duchamp. In this short book, Jeremy Gray explains Bolyai's ideas and the historical context in which they emerged, were debated, and were eventually recognized as a central achievement in the Western intellectual tradition. Intended for nonspecialists, the book includes facsimiles of Bolyai's original paper and the 1898 English translation by G. B. Halsted, both reproduced from copies in the Burndy Library at MIT.

About the Author
Jeremy J. Gray is Professor at the Open University, UK.

Product Details

• Paperback: 256 pages
• Publisher: The MIT Press; illustrated edition edition (June 1, 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0262571749
• ISBN-13: 978-0262571746
• Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.1 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,062,894 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #25 in	Books > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Mathematics > Geometry & Topology > Non-Euclidean Geometries
  #33 in	Books > Science > Mathematics > Geometry & Topology > Non-Euclidean Geometries

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Readable history, difficult paper, May 3, 2007

By	Viktor Blasjo - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I find Bolyai's paper quite hopeless to read; it's a strange choice for semi-popular publication. Gray's introduction is very pleasant and interesting and full of historical background, but his commentary on Bolyai's actual paper is quite short and not always clear. He does comment extensively on Bolyai's squaring of the circle but this construction is too complicated to be very enjoyable. This result, and Bolyai's entire approach, depends on hyperbolic trigonometric formulae. He saw that such formulae should exist by finding a correspondence between a hyperbolic plane and a surface in hyperbolic space whose geometry is Euclidean (F-surface, horosphere). Today we may interpret this in terms of the half-space model. As our hyperbolic plane we can take a hemisphere centred at the origin and as the horosphere we can take a plane z=c. Lines on the hemisphere are of course intersections with planes perpendicular to the x-y-plane, and lines on the horosphere are Euclidean lines. Under vertical projection of one onto the other lines go to lines and angles are preserved. So a Euclidean right-angle triangle with one vertex at the z-axis correspond to a hyperbolic right-angle triangle with one vertex at the z-axis. And by rotating about the z-axis we see that the ratio of circumferences of the circles generated by the other two vertices is the same on both surfaces. This relates side lengths and thus gives a way of transferring Euclidean trigonometry to the hyperbolic plane. But in hyperbolic geometry the circumference does not grow linearly with the radius (but rather as the hyperbolic sine of the radius, as Bolyai shows later using the angle of parallelism formula), so Euclidean trigonometry does not transfer literally.