Review
“Somit and Peterson assert that natural selection and genetic development created a human tendency for dominance, submission, hierarchy, and obedience, as opposed to equality and democracy.... They challenge facile hopes for expanding democracy but do not write democracy off.... their belief thhat 'civic indoctrination' can instill the values and practices of democracy deserves consideration.... The authors enrich debate about democracy...”–Choice
“This short book is essentially a literature review of the major scholarship and generalizations in the field....Most scholars in the fields of politics and life science will be familiar with literature and the line of argument presented by the authors. More likely, this book would be of interest to a general audience and students who seek an introduction to some of the research and debate in the field of biopolitics.”–Perspectives of Political Science
“Somit and Peterson have produced an intriguing and provocative account of the limits of democracy.... [T]hey provide a challenge to democratic theory that is of tremendous pedagogical use.... It poses issues that should engage theorists and advanced students, but it is written at a level that is accessible to undergraduate courses [as well].”–Meredith W. Watts Professor, Political Science University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
“Somit and Peterson provide an informative account of the evolutionary basis for our historical (and current) opposition to democracy. For many, this will be an unwelcome message--like being told that one's fly is unzipped. But after a brief bout of anger, we tend to thank the messenger for sparing us further embarrassment.”–Robert E. Lane Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Yale University Past President, American Political Science Association
“[A]n intrepid but compassionate study of the political dilemmas stimulated by the hierarchical regularities of human groups. It is also responsibly passionate about getting the scholarship right, the interpretation honest, and the implications unfancifully clear. This volume should be a firm part of curricula on democracy, the history of political theory, and on human nature.”–Lionel Tiger Rutgers University
“This is a bold and forceful attempt to state clearly and without needless technicality the problem democracy faces in surviving, not against totalitarian foes, but against its own inherent incompatibility with our evolved emotional and cognitive natures.... [A]n excellent, well-argued, well-documented and courageous effort to face ideologically unpalatable facts with a dose of scientific realism.”–Robin Fox University Professor of Social Theory Rutgers University
“Albert Somit and Steven Peterson have the distinction of having remained mainstream while becoming leaders in the biopolitical movement.”–Jean Laponce Department of Political Science The University of British Columbia Coeditor, the International Political Science Review
“While addressed primarily to students of Comparative Politics, this study has crucial implications for those of us in the field of international and global politics. Systematically summarizing the research findings in evolutionary biology and brilliantly bringing them to bear on the problems of human governance, the authors inadvertently reveal the naivete of the current enthusiasm for the 'democratic peace' doctrine.... This book is, further, a powerful refutation of today's triumphalists.”–J. David Singer Department of Political Science University of Michigan
“This short book is essentially a literature review of the major scholarship and generalizations in the field....Most scholars in the fields of politics and life science will be familiar with literature and the line of argument presented by the authors. More likely, this book would be of interest to a general audience and students who seek an introduction to some of the research and debate in the field of biopolitics.”–
“Somit and Peterson have produced an intriguing and provocative account of the limits of democracy.... [T]hey provide a challenge to democratic theory that is of tremendous pedagogical use.... It poses issues that should engage theorists and advanced students, but it is written at a level that is accessible to undergraduate courses [as well].”–
“Somit and Peterson provide an informative account of the evolutionary basis for our historical (and current) opposition to democracy. For many, this will be an unwelcome message--like being told that one's fly is unzipped. But after a brief bout of anger, we tend to thank the messenger for sparing us further embarrassment.”–
“[A]n intrepid but compassionate study of the political dilemmas stimulated by the hierarchical regularities of human groups. It is also responsibly passionate about getting the scholarship right, the interpretation honest, and the implications unfancifully clear. This volume should be a firm part of curricula on democracy, the history of political theory, and on human nature.”–
“This is a bold and forceful attempt to state clearly and without needless technicality the problem democracy faces in surviving, not against totalitarian foes, but against its own inherent incompatibility with our evolved emotional and cognitive natures.... [A]n excellent, well-argued, well-documented and courageous effort to face ideologically unpalatable facts with a dose of scientific realism.”–
“Albert Somit and Steven Peterson have the distinction of having remained mainstream while becoming leaders in the biopolitical movement.”–
“While addressed primarily to students of Comparative Politics, this study has crucial implications for those of us in the field of international and global politics. Systematically summarizing the research findings in evolutionary biology and brilliantly bringing them to bear on the problems of human governance, the authors inadvertently reveal the naivete of the current enthusiasm for the 'democratic peace' doctrine.... This book is, further, a powerful refutation of today's triumphalists.”–
Product Description
Somit and Peterson seek to explain an incontrovertible, though hardly welcome fact: throughout human history, the overwhelming majority of political societies have been characterized by the rule of the few over the many, by dominance and submission, by command and obedience. Evolutionary theory provides an important part of the explanation: humans have been subject to natural selection and one result is that the species tends to feature dominance hierarchies, obedience to authority, and indoctrinability as various means of maintaining social order. These evolution-based behavioral tendencies help to explain the success of authoritarianism and the relative lack of success of democracy over time.
