|
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Attractive and fun to read, but flawed, January 9, 1999
By A Customer
The first thing I did (natch') was to zero in on my home turf, Flatbush. I found enough doubtful information in a few pages to poison the entire book for me.First, I lived for 15 years (1950-65) smack in the middle of a two block square area it styles "Caton Park." During that time I knew just about everyone in that area (at least everyone that had kids, which was a lot, there being PS249 in the middle of it), and I _never_ even heard the term "Caton Park." So the name is either an old real estate term that never caught on, or a recent affectation. Second, they show the borders of Prospect Park South as way bigger than it is. PPS is a distinct turn-of-the-century development with beautiful mansions and a motto "Rur in Urb" (forgive if I misspelled the Latin): "Country in the City." Its residents included the Japanese Ambassador to the U.S. and the heir to the Ex-Lax fortune. Its borders are Church Ave on the north, the backyards of the houses on Buckingham Road, then the Brighton Line on the east, Beverley Road on the south, and a point between Stratford Road and Coney Island Avenue on the west. They have PPS as going as far east as E.19 St. about three blocks too far) and all the way to Coney Island Ave. If you look at the housing stock in the "extended" areas you'll see why this is more than a harmless error. Third, they identify "Albemarle Terrace" as a neighborhood area, then provide a picture of it which is actually of Prospect Park South, some blocks distant. I haven't even started to review the book systematically, these are only my casual observations. It's possible I found the only three errors in the book in my first few minutes, but somehow I don't think so. Part of their research technique is to ask residents where they think they live, but this methodology is somewhat like the recently popular "oral history," which produces colorful reminisences, but very unreliable history. I like the book even so, but read it as you would a horoscope, with a few grains of salt. Please don't use it to try to win arguments.
|