|
|
102 of 105 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
More than history -- decision - makers under pressure, January 3, 2000
This book is a thrill to read: the crucial five day period during which a very small group of determined people, led by one particularly - determined man, persuaded England and The West to hold the line against Hitler, and at least arguably saved The World...The story is not new, but this presentation of it is. A generation -- or so, now -- raised on Wheeler - Bennett and AJP Taylor, and Nicolson and Namier and all the very many others, knows very well the story of Winston Churchill and his country's lonely stand against the Axis just following the Fall of France. What never has been presented as dramatically as John Lukacs now presents it are the machinations, and the political follies and wisdom, and the ultimately very personal story of just how Churchill and a few others convinced the British at the time to do what they did: not in broad brushstrokes -- those are far easier to paint, as so many have on this topic -- but in the meticulous details which, alone, can show the individual frustrations, fears, jealousies, and uncertainties which characterize any truly historic human situation. Detailed and meticulous as it is, however -- Lukacs is a well - respected historian -- the book is very short, and very dramatic, not at all pedantic or defensive as books about the period increasingly tend to be. His writing style flows smoothly. His aim, the author says in his Preface, is to explore an idea he has held for "forty, perhaps even fifty, years" that the five days specified in the title were critical not only because of the Fall of France but also because, "Churchill's situation within the War Cabinet was much more difficult than most people, including historians at that time, thought". The result is a fascinating, day - by - day, account of how single - minded and occasionally - brilliant but nevertheless inexorably - human politicians maneuvered, and ultimately out - maneuvered, each other into positions -- positions which can be seen to be clear and on the side of the angels, or on the other, only in retrospect. At the time, all was very murky, as it perhaps is at any truly significant historical turning point, and Lukacs the careful historian practically forces us to appreciate this. Defenders of Edward Wood, Lord Halifax will be upset by this book, and so perhaps will be the increasing numbers of armchair revisionists of the period now making historical hay from views ranging from "World War II need not have happened" to "World War II did not happen" to "World War II was not a war". There will be arguments -- there are any time someone saves The World, or is suggested to have done so. There also are heroes, occasionally, or at least heroic actions -- and there are traitors, and cowards and fools -- and always there is foolishness, and some bravery and many errors, committed as much by the heroes as by their counterparts. But Lukacs is not chiefly concerned in his book with such after - the - fact debates -- although he does not avoid them, and although they may engulf him when his critics take on this book simply because he has chosen this particular highly - controversial period. He instead addresses most directly a more immediate and at once a more universal theme: how do people act, and react, under enormous pressure, particularly when the "correct" decisions to make are not popular or, worse, are not clear. Churchill, and Halifax and the others, all were operating under such conditions during these five crucial days in May in 1940. It is instructive for any of us too accustomed to comfortable certainties in history to see just how uncertain all of this was at the time; chastening to be reminded just how imperfect human decision - making processes are; breathtaking to realize how rapidly situations and events unfold for political leaders who in fact often have all too little power really to influence results. This book is a very good read, for anyone interested in its particular war, but also for anyone interested generally in politics, power, or personality.
|